Blood pressure monitoring following individual carpules of anesthetic utilizing computer-controlled anesthetic delivery

ABSTRACT To date, no study has evaluated blood pressure following administration of each carpule given for dental procedures using a computerized dental anesthesia system. Blood pressures

taken prior to performing invasive periodontal procedures were compared with those readings measured following delivery of each of up to three consecutive carpules of Marcaine or Xylocaine

in varying order. Pressure differences were also adjusted for age, sex, race, and whether a prescribed anxiolytic was taken beforehand. Neither systolic nor diastolic blood pressures changed

significantly as compared to initial blood pressure readings. However, compared with Whites, Hispanics, and Middle Easterners, Blacks had significantly higher systolic pressure at the third

carpule delivery, the cause being unknown. Blood pressure in patients being anesthetized for root planing and various periodontal surgical procedures will not increase significantly when

administering up to three carpules, whether Marcaine or Xylocaine, in varying order, using controlled flow dental anesthesia, and this method may be preferable to syringes in managing dental

procedural stress. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ADULT INTRAVENOUS SEDATION IN GENERAL DENTAL PRACTICE: INDICATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND PATIENT EXPERIENCES Article 08 July 2024 5.6%

LIDOCAINE AEROSOL ANESTHESIA FOR SUPRAGINGIVAL ULTRASONIC SCALING IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS OR DENTAL PLAQUE-INDUCED GINGIVITIS Article Open access 09 January 2025 TOPICAL

ANESTHETICS METHODS USED TO REDUCE NEEDLE PAIN/DISCOMFORT PRIOR TO LOCAL ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SCOPING REVIEW Article 24 January 2025 INTRODUCTION Anxiety is a barrier to

dental attendance.1 It is estimated that approximately half of the people in the United States fear dentistry to some degree, of which ~30 million are termed “phobic,” such that they avoid

dental care altogether.2 Much of this fear stems from the sight of the anesthetic apparatus and the sensation of the operating dental handpiece, these having been listed as the two most

fear-eliciting stimuli.3 The injection of local anesthesia can inflict discomfort, which may elicit cardiovascular changes such as hypertension or tachycardia.4 For many patients undergoing

dental procedures, pain control is essential, particularly in those with cardiovascular disease. Pain and other stressors can result in a dramatic endogenous release of epinephrine and

norepinephrine, which can affect heart disease deleteriously; therefore, the importance of good local anesthetic technique cannot be over emphasized.5 Epinephrine is widely used as an

additive in local anesthetics, most typically in concentrations of 1:100,000 in 2% Xylocaine. This improves the depth and duration of the anesthesia, and reduces bleeding in the operative

field. Epinephrine counteracts the anesthetic’s localized vasodilator effects in subcutaneous and submucosal vessels, thereby reducing the risk of anesthetic toxicity while decreasing the

rate of systemic absorption from the site of the injection.6 Quite commonly, a longer lasting anesthetic with 1:200,000 epinephrine in 0.05% Marcaine is employed in root planing and surgical

procedures, depending on patient circumstance. For certain patients, the stress and anxiety associated with even simple, noninvasive dental visits is enough to increase blood pressure. The

common medical condition called white coat hypertension (or white coat syndrome) is important for dental professionals to acknowledge, and routine monitoring of patients in this situation

can help prevent possible negative effects associated with this situation. Carotid atherosclerosis is considerably greater in patients with white coat hypertension when compared to those

without; therefore, it has been stated that white coat hypertension is a risk factor for heart attack, heart failure, and stroke.7 New guidelines from the American Heart Association and the

American College of Cardiology in December of 2017 have redefined hypertensive thresholds, with readings of 130/80 now considered to be elevated, or definable as hypertension stage one.8

Optimal blood pressure is <120 systolic and <80 diastolic, and roughly one in three adults in the United States is diagnosed as having hypertension.7 Hypertension is a highly prevalent

cardiovascular disease, which affects over 1 billion people worldwide.9 Monitoring of vital signs can help minimize potentially serious adverse drug events.10 The dentist’s role in

screening for hypertension as part of a comprehensive dental care evaluation is very important.11 Risks for hypertension associated with epinephrine include increased acute hypertensive or

hypotensive episodes, angina pectoris, arrhythmias, and myocardial infarction.12 The perception of pain during administration of local anesthesia can contribute to the stress of the dental

visit. Discomfort can be attributed to tissue puncture, fluid pressure, and the flow rate of the drug administered,13 while other factors that may influence discomfort are fluid temperature

and management of the needle upon full penetration of the tissue. Many patients associate injections of local anesthetic with pain, despite its benefits in treatment. The most widely used

method of injection continues to be the metallic aspirating cartridge syringe system where flow rate and pressure are operator dependent, making it rather difficult to manage injection

discomfort. Alternatively, a computerized dental anesthesia delivery system more precisely controls flow rate and fluid pressure by the use of a microprocessor and electronically controlled

motor.14 The computer-controlled delivery device accommodates a conventional local anesthetic cartridge that is linked by tubing to a disposable pen-like plastic dispenser with an attached

luer-lok needle.13 It is operated by means of a small rheostat placed on the floor and which delivers local anesthetic at controllable pressure and volume rates.15 Several studies have shown

this device to be well-received by patients. Twenty subjects undergoing scaling and root planing reported less pain with computer-controlled injections versus that from a traditional

syringe as indicated by a visual analog scale.16 Additionally, a split-mouth study in which 50 subjects used subjective scales to describe pain experience found the computer to be on average

two to three times less painful than manual injection.14 Another study in Turkey analyzed 40 patients between the ages of 18 and 30 over two separate dental visits, each subject randomly

having traditional delivery of anesthetic at one appointment versus computer-controlled delivery at a subsequent appointment. The subjects then assigned a pain rating score to the two

methods, and indicated they would prefer the computer delivery system for future injections.17 Blood pressure monitoring, likely a more reliable indicator of the physiologic effects of

stress in response to injection than the aforementioned subjective response analyses, has been employed in several syringe-employed anesthetic studies. One study comparing blood pressure

readings while using a syringe to administer differing concentrations of epinephrine found no significant variances among the three groups which were studied.18 Another study found blood

pressure increased during injections by syringe in four groups of patients undergoing extraction, regardless of their ASA status.19 Furthermore, Japanese researchers found with the use of a

Holter monitor, dental surgery using local anesthesia caused a significant increase in systolic blood pressure, but not in the diastolic, and that the increase in pressure was greater in

middle aged and older patients.20 In another study where blood pressures were monitored with and without administration of local anesthetic using a syringe, a transient blood pressure

increase was found followed by a decrease shortly after removal of the needle from the mouth.21 Additionally, in a study of four groups of patients ranging from normotensive to severely

hypertensive and who were undergoing tooth extraction with local anesthetic, again utilizing syringes, it was found that blood pressure increased in all groups, with the greatest increase

found in those already diagnosed as hypertensive.19 It appears to date, however, that no prior study has been conducted measuring physiologic response via blood pressure monitoring with the

use of the computerized controlled flow anesthesia delivery system, nor has there been any dental anesthetic blood pressure study performed to assess blood pressure following administration

of each carpule of anesthetic administered for dental procedures. Furthermore, this study separated for differences in age, sex, race and effects of the use of an anxiolytic. Seeing as how

anesthetic can cause anxiety, and because patient monitoring is important in measuring such stress, this study was undertaken to evaluate blood pressure readings in up to 149 patients at

baseline, as well as after each carpule administered, varying second and third carpules between Xylocaine and Marcaine, using a computerized controlled-delivery anesthesia system. The null

hypothesis in this study was that blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) will not increase significantly during administration of anesthesia as compared to the patients’ initial

readings when using the computer-controlled delivery system. MATERIALS AND METHODS IRB exempt status was obtained due to the blind nature of this study. Blood pressure was measured at

baseline and again following delivery of each of three consecutively administered carpules of dental anesthetic in 149 periodontal patients previously scheduled for either root planing or

periodontal surgical procedures which included cosmetic and functional crown lengthening, osseous surgery, and soft tissue grafting. Blood pressure readings were taken at baseline and

immediately following the emptying of each consecutive carpule. The blood pressure monitor used was the Mindray Datascope Trio Patient Monitor, which also monitored pulse oximetry and

electrocardiogram activity throughout procedures. The anesthetic delivery system employed, whereby carpule administration occurs via a flow rate that is controlled by use of a microprocessor

and electric motor, was used in all patients. No adverse effects were noted during any of the procedures, while a variety of injection types were employed, all with 27 gauge needles, with

approximately half of the patients receiving palatal injections. Vasoconstriction was utilized due to the need for increased anesthesia duration. Patients were previously prescribed 0.5 mg

of Alprazolam, to be taken 1 h prior to the scheduled procedure (with 39 patients opting not to take the medication, and 4 opting to use their own already-prescribed antianxiety medication).

The first carpule given to all patients was exclusively Xylocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine. In 116 of these patients, the second carpule given was another Xylocaine 2% with 1:100,000

epinephrine, while in 33 of these patients the second was 0.5% Marcaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. A third carpule was then given in 116 patients, wherein 99 patients had another carpule of

2% Xylocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, while 17 had a carpule of 0.5% Marcaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine only in those patients whose first two carpules had been exclusively Xylocaine.

Of these, 34 patients had not taken any antianxiety medication, and 4 opted to take their own already-prescribed medication. A one-sided paired _t_-test to compare blood pressure following

administration of each carpule separately with the initial blood pressure reading was utilized. Because there was a maximum of three carpules in total for each subject, separate hypothetical

comparisons were conducted for carpules 1–3 where applicable. The Bonferroni correction method was employed to control the familywise type one error rate at a 0.05 level for multiple

comparisons. Linear regressions were also adopted to compare differences controlling for age, sex, race, and whether patients had antianxiety medication or not before the procedure. RESULTS

COMPARISON OF THE CHANGE IN BLOOD PRESSURE WHILE VARYING THE SECOND TYPE OF ANESTHETIC CARPULE WHEN THE FIRST CARPULE WAS XYLOCAINE SECOND CARPULE TYPE RELATIVE TO CHANGE IN BLOOD PRESSURE

(SAMPLE SIZE 149) SYSTOLIC PRESSURE Figure 1 provides a descriptive analysis and shows _t_-test results for the relationship between the type of second carpule, following a first carpule of

Xylocaine, and the difference in systolic pressure from the initial pressure reading. Using Xylocaine as carpule 2, the average change in systolic pressure is positive (lower at initial),

while the average change is negative (lower at carpule 2) when using Marcaine as the second carpule. However, the _p_ value from a one-way ANOVA test is 0.80, indicating that the

relationship between the type of second anesthetic carpule and the change in systolic pressure is not different at a significance level of 0.05. DIASTOLIC PRESSURE Figure 2 provides

descriptive analysis and shows _t_-test results. The _p_ value of 0.79 indicates that there is no significant relationship between the type of second anesthetic carpule and the change in

diastolic pressure. SECOND CARPULE TYPE RELATIVE TO CHANGE IN BLOOD PRESSURE WHEN ADJUSTING FOR AGE, SEX, RACE, AND USE OF ANXIOLYTIC SYSTOLIC PRESSURE Table 1 shows the results using a

linear regression model, between the type of second carpule and the change in systolic pressure when controlling for other factors. The _p_ value of 0.87 indicates that when adjusting for

age, sex, race, and anxiolytic, the type of second anesthetic has no significant effect on the change of systolic pressure. In addition, none of these factors significantly relate to change

in systolic blood pressure. DIASTOLIC PRESSURE Table 2 shows the results using a linear regression model. The _p_ value of 0.81 indicates that there is no significant relationship between

the type of third anesthetic carpule and the change in diastolic pressure when controlling for age, sex, race, and anxiolytic. Also these other factors do not significantly relate with the

change of diastolic pressure. COMPARISON OF THE CHANGE IN BLOOD PRESSURE WHILE VARYING THE THIRD TYPE OF ANESTHETIC CARPULE DELIVERY, MEASURED ONLY IN THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHOSE FIRST TWO

ANESTHETIC DELIVERIES WERE BOTH XYLOCAINE THIRD CARPULE TYPE RELATIVE TO CHANGE IN BLOOD PRESSURE (SAMPLE SIZE 116) SYSTOLIC PRESSURE Figure 3 provides a descriptive analysis and shows

_t_-test results. The _p_ value of 0.14 indicates that there is no significant relationship between the type of the third anesthetic carpule and the change in systolic pressure among

individuals whose first two carpules were both Xylocaine. DIASTOLIC PRESSURE Figure 4 provides a descriptive analysis and shows _t_-test results. The _p_ value of 0.1519 indicates that there

is no significant relationship between the type of the third carpule and change in diastolic pressure among individuals whose first two carpules were both Xylocaine. THIRD CARPULE TYPE

RELATIVE TO CHANGE IN BLOOD PRESSURE WHEN ADJUSTING FOR AGE, SEX, RACE, AND USE OF ANXIOLYTIC SYSTOLIC PRESSURE Table 3 shows the results using a linear regression model, indicating no

significant relationship between the type of third anesthetic carpule and the change in systolic pressure when controlling for other factors. However, race was an important predictor for

change in systolic pressure. Compared with Whites, Hispanics, and Middle Easterners, Blacks exhibited a significantly larger change in systolic pressure at the third carpule delivery.

DIASTOLIC PRESSURE Table 4 shows the results using a linear regression model. There is no significant relationship between the type of third anesthetic carpule and the change in diastolic

pressure when controlling for age, sex, race, and anxiolytic. Also, none of these factors significantly relate to change in diastolic blood pressure. This study showed no difference in

adjusting for race except that compared with Whites, Hispanics, and Middle Easterners, Blacks had a significantly larger change in systolic pressure at the third carpule delivery with the

computer-controlled-flow anesthesia system. The reason for this within the parameters of this study is unclear. However, generally, it was found that both systolic and diastolic blood

pressures did not increase significantly as compared to initial blood pressure readings following administration of three carpules of Marcaine or Xylocaine, in varying order, using the

computerized delivery anesthetic system, showing this to be a possible method of reducing stress in anesthesia administration. This study showed no difference in adjusting for age and sex.

Regarding the effects of anxiolytics, and using Alprazolam as a reference group, while some anxiolytic response showed a relative lower (negative coefficient) blood pressure effect, and

others showed a relatively higher (positive coefficient) blood pressure effect, none were significant. In other words, no group was significantly different from the group receiving

Alprazolam after adjusting for other variables. DISCUSSION Stress during injections can be a deterrent to successful and less eventful patient treatment, especially in cases of hypertension,

yet no study to date has monitored blood pressure with controlled flow or following each carpule administered, separating for age, sex, race, and use of anxiolytic. This is of interest for

several reasons. Currently, up to 46% of United States adults are identified as having high blood pressure.22 Of significance is the fact that elevations in both systolic and diastolic blood

pressures can be used to make a diagnosis of hypertension, and the risk of death from ischemic heart disease and stroke has been found to double with every 20 mm of mercury (systolic) or 10

 mm mercury (diastolic) in persons aged 40–89.23 Thus, dental professionals must be on the frontlines of prevention of hypertension by evaluating preoperative blood pressure readings,

performing risk assessments, and knowing when to refer a patient for medical consultation in a dental setting.12 Studies of the prevalence of dental anxiety in the general population show a

range of 2.6–20.4%,24 and measurement of blood pressure during the stressful moments surrounding injection-giving helps dentists to avoid untoward cardiovascular events. High levels of

stress, including that from dental anesthetic, can indeed lead to increases in blood pressure, even if temporary.25,26,27 Anesthetics were selected according to what best suited each

individual patient depending on duration of anesthesia and hemostasis needed. The Lidocaine HCl 2% solution with a 1:100,000 epinephrine concentration used in this study provides average

pulpal anesthesia for 60 min, with soft tissue anesthesia for ~2.5 h.28 The concentration of 0.5% Marcaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine employed yields a duration of anesthesia two to three

times longer than that of the Lidocaine, in many patients lasting up to 7 h.29 Furthermore, measuring vital signs frequently where multiple injections are performed has been advised as a

consideration and prevention of anesthetic emergencies.28 The rate at which anesthetic is injected is seemingly very important in preventing stress in dental patients. Slower administration

of a carpule over a period of a maximum of 60 s is recommended for optimal reduction of pain during injection.30 This computerized local anesthesia delivery system offered several advantages

over a conventional syringe, including controlled, slow flow delivery, likely improved tactile sensation with the lightweight plastic handle, and the ability to rotate the needle as it is

introduced into tissue, as well as while aspirating. Disadvantages include the fact that the system is costly, rather complex, bulky, and generally consumes more time for administration of

anesthetic. Interest in race and age differences in blood pressure within this study stems from prior variances in these parameters. Data from a National Health and Nutrition Examination

Survey showed that between 2015 and 2016, prevalence of hypertension was 29% and increased with age, with 18–39 years old at 7.5% and those over 60 at 63.1%. Hypertensive prevalence was

higher in non-Hispanic blacks at 40.3% than non-Hispanic whites at 27.8%, non-Hispanic Asians at 25.0% or Hispanics at 27.8% in adults. However, hypertension control was higher among the

non-Hispanic whites at 50.8% then non-Hispanic blacks at 44.6% or non-Hispanic Asians at 37.4%.31 This current study showed that following each of up to three carpules given, no significant

increase in blood pressure, except with systolic pressure in Blacks when the third carpule was administered. The cause of this is uncertain. Because hypertension affects ~75 million United

States residents,32 as well as the fact that the administration of local anesthesia containing epinephrine can affect the cardiovascular system, gentle anesthesia management, and proper

monitoring of patients receiving injections is crucial.5 Patient variables that were not controlled in this study include the possibility that patients had variances in presurgical meal

content, or other drugs which may have affected blood pressure responses,12,25,33 possibly exacerbating or compounding the effects of the stress of the injection and the epinephrine

contained within the anesthetic. Also, time between injections and the locale of each injection, as some anatomical locations in the mouth have different tissue resistance,34 were not

standardized, and therefore could have affected patient-to-patient comparisons. It is conceivable that implementing a future study that controls these factors more astutely and which would

employ a larger patient population with each individual factor would likely create greater reliability of the results found herein. REFERENCES * Meechan, J. G., Howlett, P. C. & Smith,

B. D. Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration. _Anesth. Prog._ 52, 91–94 (2005). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * McCann, D. Dental phobia:

conquering fear with trust. _J. Am. Dent. Assoc_. 119, 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8177(89)95010-1 (1989). * Kleinknecht, R. A., Klepac, R. K. & Alexander, L. D. Origins and

characteristics of fear of dentistry. _J. Am. Dent. Assoc._ 86, 842–848 (1973). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mochizuki, M. et al. Changes in heart rate and blood pressure during dental

procedures with local anesthesia. _Anesth. Prog._ 36, 234–235 (1989). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Davis, B. What dose of epinephrine contained in local anesthesia can be

safely administered to a patient with underlying cardiac disease during a dental procedure? _J. Can. Dent. Assoc._ 76, a36 (2010). Google Scholar  * Bader, J. D., Bonito, A. J. &

Shugars, D. A. Cardiovascular effects of epinephrine in hypertensive dental patients: summary. In _AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries_, Vol. 48, 1998–2005 (Agency for Healthcare Research and

Quality (US), Rockville, MD, 2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11858/. * Lawson, L. 10 reasons why we must take dental patients’ blood pressure. _RDH_

https://www.rdhmag.com/patient-care/article/16409903/10-reasons-why-we-must-take-dental-patients-blood-pressure (2017). * Jeong, C. Dental professional update: blood pressure guidelines

changed. https://www.dentistryiq.com/dental-hygiene/clinical-hygiene/article/16366105/dental-professional-update-blood-pressure-guidelines-changed (2017). * Popescu, S. M., Scrieciu, M.,

Mercuu, V., Tuculina, M. & Dascslu I. Hypertensive patients and their management in dentistry. _Hindawi Publ. Corp_. 410740. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/410740 (2013). * Yagiela, J. A.

Adverse drug interactions in dental practice: interactions associated with vasoconstrictors. Part V of a series. _J. Am. Dent. Assoc._ 130, 701–709 (1999). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Burger, D. New guideline on hypertension lowers threshold. _ADANews_ (December 2017)

https://www.ada.org/en/publications/ada-news/2017-archive/november/new-guideline-on-hypertension-lowers-threshold. * Southerland, J. H. et al. Dental management in patients with

hypertension: challenges and solutions. _Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent._ 8, 111–120 (2016). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Yenisey, M. Comparison of the pain levels of

computer-controlled and conventional anesthesia techniques in prosthodontic treatment. _J. Appl. Oral Sci._ 17, 414–420 (2009). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hochman,

M., Chiarello, D., Hochman, C. B., Lopatkin, R. & Pergola, S. Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response. _N. Y. State Dent. J._

63, 24–29 (1997). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Aggarwal, K., Lamba, A. K., Faraz, F., Tandon, S. & Makker, K. Comparison of anxiety and pain perceived with conventional and computerized

local anesthesia delivery systems for different stages of anesthesia delivery in maxillary and mandibular nerve blocks. _J. Dent. Anesth. Pain. Med._ 18, 367–373 (2018). Article  PubMed 

PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Loomer, P. M. & Perry, D. A. Computer-controlled delivery versus syringe delivery of local anesthetic injections for therapeutic scaling and root

planing. _J. Am. Dent. Assoc._ 135, 358–365 (2004). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yesilyurt, C., Bulut, G. & Taşdemir, T. Pain perception during inferior alveolar injection

administered with the Wand or conventional syringe. _Br. Dent. J._ 205, E10 (2008). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Abu-Mostafa, N et al. Hemodynamic changes following injection of local

anesthetics with different concentrations of epinephrine during simple tooth extraction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. _J. Clin. Exp. Dent._ 7, e471–e476 (2015). Article  PubMed 

PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Abraham-Inpijn, L., Borgmeijer-Hoelen, A. & Gortzak, R. A. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and electrocardiogram during dental treatment with use

of local anesthesia. _J. Am. Dent. Assoc._ 116, 531–536 (1988). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Matsumura, K. et al. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate variability during dental

surgery. _Am. J. Hypertens._ 11, 1376–1380 (1998). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gortzak, R., Oosting, J. & Abraham-Inpijn, L. Blood pressure response to routine restorative dental

treatment with and without local anesthesia: continuous noninvasive blood pressure registration with a finger manometer. _Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol._ 73, 677–681 (1992). Article 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Miller, C., Glick, M. & Rhodus, N. 2017 hypertension guidelines new opportunities and challenges. _J. Am. Dent. Assoc._ 149, 229–231 (2018). Article  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * American Heart Association. Understanding blood pressure readings. https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/high-blood-pressure/understanding-blood-pressure-readings (2018).

* Locker, D., Shapiro, D. & Liddell, A. Who is dentally anxious? Concordance between measures of dental anxiety. _Community Dent. Oral. Epidemiol._ 24, 346–350 (1996). Article  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Mayo Clinic. High blood pressure (hypertension). https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-pressure/symptoms-causes/syc-20373410 (2018). * WebMD. Xanax.

https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-9824/xanax-oral/details. Accessed December 2018. * Donaldson, M., Gizzarelli, G. & Chanpong, B. Oral sedation: a primer on anxiolysis for the adult

patient. _Anesth. Prog._ 54, 118–129 (2007). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Drugs.com. Lignospan. https://www.drugs.com/pro/lignospan-injection.html. Accessed August

2020. * Drugs.com. Marcaine. https://www.drugs.com/pro/marcaine.html. Accessed August 2020. * Subramaniam, S. & Neelakantan, P. Local anesthesia in dentistry—clinical considerations.

_Int. J. Drug Dev. Res._ 5, 30–36 (2013). Google Scholar  * Fryar, C. D., Ostchega, Y., Hales, C. M., Zhang, G. & Kruszon-Moran, D. Hypertension prevalence and control among adults:

United States, 2015–2016. _NCHS Data Brief_  289, 1–8 (2017). * Merai, R. et al. CDC grand rounds: a public health approach to detect and control hypertension. _Morbidity Mortal. Wkly Rep._

65, 1261–1264 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Mayo Clinic. High blood pressure (hypertension).

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-pressure/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20373417. Accessed December 2018. * Krochak, M. & Friedman, N. Using a precision-metered

injection system to minimize dental injection anxiety. _Compend Contin. Educ. Dent._ 19, 137–140 (1998). PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS K.M.S. dedicates this

article posthumously to Dean Henry Gremillion. She also wishes to acknowledge LSUHSD dental students Alexander DeGenova and Tiffany Morgan, for their assistance in data collection. AUTHOR

INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Gratis Faculty, Practice Limited to Periodontics and Louisiana State University Health School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA, USA Kristi M. Soileau *

Healthcare Administration, New Orleans, LA, USA Adam E. DeGenova * Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA Qingzhao Yu Authors * Kristi M. Soileau View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Adam E. DeGenova View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Qingzhao

Yu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Kristi M. Soileau. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The

authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional

affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution

and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if

changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the

material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to

obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS

ARTICLE Soileau, K.M., DeGenova, A.E. & Yu, Q. Blood pressure monitoring following individual carpules of anesthetic utilizing computer-controlled anesthetic delivery. _BDJ Open_ 6, 21

(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-00049-y Download citation * Received: 20 July 2020 * Revised: 28 September 2020 * Accepted: 03 October 2020 * Published: 02 November 2020 * DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-00049-y SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not

currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative