A Supreme muddle | The Week
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
WASHINGTON, D.C. A sharply divided Supreme Court this week came close to overturning a major environmental law, setting the scene for additional battles over federal wetlands protection. In
a case testing the reach of the Clean Water Act, four conservative justices said the government may only block development on wetlands found to have a “continuous surface connection” to a
body of water. Four liberal justices said that standard would gut enforcement of wetland laws. With the court split down the middle, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the controlling opinion,
which sent the case back to federal agencies with the guidance that wetlands should have a “significant nexus” with waterways to justify federal intervention. Environmentalists said they had
“dodged a bullet.” But Chief Justice John Roberts, part of the conservative wing, wrote that in the wake of the muddled decision, “lower courts and regulated entities will have to feel
their way forward on a case-by-case basis.” A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com SUBSCRIBE TO THE WEEK Escape your echo
chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives. SUBSCRIBE & SAVE SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning news briefing to a weekly
Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly
to your inbox.