Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming

Gallup's poll on Americans' favorite investments always makes fascinating reading. Every year, Gallup asks Americans to choose the best investment from the following choices: Real

estate, stocks and mutual funds, gold, savings accounts and certificates of deposit, or bonds. In the years since the 2008 financial crisis and housing bust — after which Americans as a

group briefly ranked gold as their favorite investment — real estate has once again swung back into favor: [Gallup] SUBSCRIBE TO THE WEEK Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the

news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives. SUBSCRIBE & SAVE SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the

best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. But as Barry

Ritholtz notes over at _Bloomberg View_, the most interesting thing is that there are some serious differences between the investment styles of the poor and the rich. First, the rich love

real estate and stocks: But lower-income Americans tend to favor gold: Now, as it happens, the investments favored by the rich have performed vastly better in the last century than those

favored by the poor. As I've described before, over the last 200 years, stock indexes have been by far the best performing asset class, easily outperforming bonds, real estate, and,

especially, cash and gold. And there are pretty good reasons for that. Gold is a shiny lump of metal that pays no dividends and collects no rents. In fact, it can cost money to hold — such

as security and storage costs, for example. The only way to make a profit from gold is if someone is willing to pay more than you did for it at a later time. Sometimes, when people in the

gold market are buying, gold does very well — as it did from 2000 to 2012 — but if people stop wanting to buy at a higher price, then the price can fall a lot. On the other hand, real estate

(both residential and land) yields rents, and stocks in productive companies yield dividends. Even bonds and savings accounts pay an interest rate. A free daily email with the biggest news

stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com So why do some investors still go for gold? Well, not everyone has access to the same information. Lots of people are still scared

by stocks and real estate because of the 2008 bust (just look at falling rates of stock ownership), and aren't looking at the bigger picture, in which stocks in particular outperform

everything, especially gold. But Ritholtz suggests the key is people's attitudes: [Investing in real estate] reflects a faith in the legitimacy of the local property laws and legal

system; that you will be secure in that property, and no one can illegally take it from you. Stocks are similar: Investing in them reflects a long-term faith that the nation will continue

expanding its production of goods and services. Stocks are an optimistic asset class almost by definition. [ _Bloomberg View_] And gold? Ritholtz sees it as a disaster currency: On the

surface, this makes sense: Rich people are by definition those who are doing well within the current economic system, while poor people are by definition not doing so well within it. So

it's totally unsurprising that the rich are expressing higher levels of confidence in a system they are doing well within, and the poor are expressing lower levels of confidence. It is

just a reflection of their situation. But there's another strong possibility as well: Lower income individuals tend to be less financially literate. Many of the poor surveyed by Gallup

might simply not be as well-educated about stocks, bonds, and real estate investment trusts as the rich. After all, only 11 percent of those who make less than $25,000 a year have a

non-retirement investment, compared with 60 percent of those who make more than $75,000. Gold, on the other hand, might seem like an attractive investment option if only because it is fairly

synonymous with wealth. Tied to financial literacy is familiarity. Because the poor have little money to spend, productive investments like stocks, bonds, etc. are out of reach. Gold,

however, is the one of the few investments that are not. As Terrance Odean, a professor of finance at the University of California, Berkeley, tells CNBC: Another trouble, however, is that

how the rich and poor understand investments isn't just reflective of wealth inequality; the differences will widen it as well. While the poor have little money to invest (almost all

goes to putting food on the table, rent, and other day-to-day expenses), the little they do won't be put to productive use. Most of the last 200 years of human history has very much

been a story of human ingenuity overcoming adversity and humans increasingly thriving on the back of technological and social innovation. Betting against the continuation of that narrative

will likely only result in being left further out in the cold.