
The tragic landscape: Caspar David Friedrich
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
The catalogue for the exhibition Caspar David Friedrich: The Soul of Nature (Metropolitan Museum of Art, NY, until May 11) is excellent on his doom-laden, metaphysical landscapes, but says
very little about the man who created them. Norbert Wolf’s short study Friedrich (Taschen, 2012) reveals details about his character, interests and tastes, his students, finances and wife.
He loved to trek in the mountains, but his travels were limited by the Napoleonic wars and his hatred of France. In his whole life (1774-1840) the artist never once visited Paris, never
saw the Alps, Italy or the Mediterranean coast.
Friedrich, the son of a pious Lutheran candle-maker and soap-boiler, was born in Greifswald, a harbour town on the Baltic Sea in northeast Germany. Between the ages of seven and seventeen
he suffered three traumatic losses. His mother died in 1781; in 1787 his brother drowned while trying to save Caspar, who had fallen through the ice; and his sister died of typhus in 1791.
He spent four years at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Copenhagen, and lived most of his life in culturally rich Dresden. As a painter, Friedrich remained faithful to his original
drawings, and used thin transparent glazes that left no trace of the brush on the surface. The Prussian Crown Prince and the future Czar Nicholas I visited his studio and bought his
paintings.
A celibate bachelor, he did not marry until 1818 when he was in his forties. He then said, “it’s a droll business when a fellow has a wife” and had to buy a lot of furniture including “a
bed of sin”. Caroline Bommer, twenty years younger, was a cheerful, humorous Saxon woman; Friedrich had a gruff exterior and unsociable nature, and was soon consumed by irrational jealousy.
The murder of a close painter-friend in 1820 plunged him into a deep and long-lasting depression. A stroke in 1835 left his arms and legs partly paralysed, and prevented him from painting
in oils, though he continued to sketch in watercolour and ink. He died five years later.
Friedrich’s work suggests the intense yearning for the absolute that the Greek author Longinus (not mentioned in this catalogue) had defined in “On the Sublime” (c.100 CE): “man’s ability,
through feeling and words, to reach beyond the realm of the human condition into greater mystery.” Friedrich declared: “The task of a work of art is to recognize the spirit of nature and,
with one’s whole heart and intention, to saturate oneself with it and absorb it and give it back again in the form of a picture. . . . I must surrender myself to what surrounds me, unite
myself with its clouds and rocks, in order to be what I am. I need solitude in order to communicate with nature.” Like his close contemporary William Wordsworth, he longed to be absorbed
“in earth’s diurnal course / With rocks, and stones, and trees.”
Friedrich portrayed mountain glory and mountain gloom, and his art is contradictory: both serene and turbulent, visionary and destructive. His paintings are unknowable and transcendent,
meditative and melancholy, eerie and enigmatic. They suggest dreams, love and loss; grief, mourning and alienation; “soaring grandeur and boundless awe-inspiring heights.”
But his “foggy vistas, mysterious mountains and moonlit landscapes,” his tiny distant figures overshadowed by nature, live in a world of unrelieved darkness and nightmare. They are also
gloomy and morose, haunting and enigmatic, angst-ridden and ominous. As Robert Frost wrote of an apocalyptic storm, “There would be more than ocean water broken / Before God’s last Put out
the light was spoken.” Toward the end of his life Friedrich became increasingly depressed and exclaimed, “Today for the first time the normally so glorious countryside cries out to me of
decay and death, where before it has only smiled to me of joy and life.”
Like the ominous birds in Edgar Poe’s morbid, death-obsessed, “ghoul-haunted woodlands,” Friedrich’s ravens announce disaster and death. Cemetery in Moonlight with an Owl (1834) portrays
the tragedy of landscape. A contributor notes, “the freshly dug grave in the foreground and tilted gabled crosses mark burial mounds beyond. A lone owl, traditional symbol of death,
perches on the gravediggers’ spade.” Friedrich’s damned outcasts and solitary wanderers also resemble Lord Byron’s dark, brooding, tragic heroes. In Oak Tree in the Snow (1827-28) and
other works, his gnarled, twisted and leaf-torn anthropomorphic branches are like the arms and fingers of drowning or half-buried men desperately reaching out for the help that fails to save
them.
The artist rarely portrayed a close-up face, except his own. In Caspar David Friedrich in His Studio (1811) he is seated in profile, with blond hair combed over his forehead and flourishing
side-whiskers. He wears a long, greyish-blue, high-collared jacket, trousers, white stockings and grey slippers. In Spartan surroundings his unusually-long maulstick crosses his
paintbrush and almost touches the ceiling. The table on the right has an open paint-box, rags and colored bottles. Two palettes, a triangle and a T-square hang on the wall between the
windows. The closed door on the left and boarded-up window on the right frame the open window, divided into four squares. It reveals the cloudy sky beyond and provides exactly the kind of
streaming light he needs. The painter’s legs, chair legs, table legs and high easel form verticals that enclose him as he leans forward to concentrate on completing his landscape.
Friedrich may have seen an engraving of Francisco Goya’s comparable Artist in His Studio (c.1795). Goya, who painted at night with candles fixed to holders in his hat, is posed at his easel
holding his brush and palette. He has a drooping mustache and dangling unruly hair, and wears a high black hat circled by a buckled ribbon, a red shirt, brown jacket with silver-buttons
and tight trousers. Standing rather than sitting before an open window and more elaborately dressed, Goya looks at the viewer rather than the painting.
Woman at the Window (1822) takes place in the same room as Friedrich’s studio. His young wife has thick brown hair, long neck and tall collar, and wears a high-waisted greenish dress, white
stockings and tan slippers. Seen from behind, she looks out of the window and sees a ship’s mast piercing the clouds and poplars on the bank of the Elbe River. A contemporary German poem
suggested the subtle effects of seeing the painter’s characteristic pose: “O no, benevolent mystery / do not turn your face to me! / Leave me silent, trembling in soulful anticipation.”
Friedrich described Monk by the Sea (1808-10) as “a seascape, in the foreground a barren, sandy beach, then a restless sea, and thence, the air. On the beach a man is walking, deep in
thought, in a black robe; gulls fly around him, fretfully shrieking, as if to warn him not to risk the brash sea”—though it’s unlikely that the landlubber monk would go for a sail or a swim.
The painting is divided into cloudy land, wavy sea and lowering sky. The tiny bareheaded monk, diminished by the overwhelming environment, stands still on the shore, unmoved by the gulls
that flap above him. Friedrich’s contemporary, the writer Heinrich von Kleist (who committed suicide in 1811), called Monk by the Sea “a miraculous painting, a visual and existential
apocalypse”, which reflected his own thoughts and feelings. It’s surprising that there’s no mention of Friedrich in the recent biographies of his cataclysmic soul mates Richard Wagner,
Friedrich Nietzsche and Edvard Munch.
In Chalk Cliffs on Rügen (1818) the canopy of leafy trees and oval of the frozen cliffs form a circle with three figures in the foreground. An older man on his knees and looking downward
has discarded his top hat and cane. He seems about to tumble into the jagged chalk cliffs that look more like Antarctica than an island in the Baltic Sea. On his left a seated woman, seen
in profile with dangling curls and a high-waisted long red gown, extends her right arm and index finger in a unheeded warning. On the right a contemplative younger man with a floppy velvet
hat ignores his companions. The cliffs form a V at the bottom of the circle and point to a single white sail in the distant center of the picture. Sigmund Freud, Thomas Mann, W. H. Auden,
Christopher Isherwood and Stephen Spender were also attracted to Rügen and spent summer holidays on the island.
The Sea of Ice (1823-24) portrays a massive glacier on the left, and sharp-edged ice packs thrusting out of the frozen sea and slowly crushing a doomed ship, whose black stern decorated with
red paint sinks below the surface. They all point left at a 45o angle toward the storm that caused the disaster. Coleridge’s “Rime of the Ancient Mariner” (1798) captures the chaotic mood
of the picture:
Friedrich’s painting foreshadows the famous 1915 photograph of the wrecked Endurance, trapped, crushed and sunk in the Arctic ice pack.
Like Pieter Brueghel’s Landscape with the Fall of Icarus (1560) and Hunters in the Snow (1565), Friedrich’s The Watzmann (1824-25), a peak in the Bavarian Alps that he had never seen, shows
towering Alpine mountains erupting unrealistically from the northern landscape.
In Shakespeare’s As You Like It, Jaques gives a famous speech on the Seven Ages of Man: infant, child, lover, soldier, judge, mature man and old man. The Stages of Life (1834) portrays five
people on the rocky shore watching five corresponding ships, with high masts and billowing sails, floating in the deep blue sea beneath a lemon and violet sky. These figures represent a
blond infant, child and female lover seen in profile, a mature man facing the viewer and an old man facing the calm sea. The child holds up a blue-and-yellow Swedish flag recalling that
Greifswald’s region, Western Pomerania, belonged to Sweden until 1815.
The Romantic poets praised the beauty, majesty and awesome power of the Alps, jutting up like church spires, the closest points on earth to heaven. In The Prelude (1805), Wordsworth
described the tremendous force of the torrents that poured down from the mountains. A decade later Shelley wrote about the towering and dangerous snow, ice and rocks in a poem about Mont
Blanc (1816), the highest peak in Europe. In Modern Painters (1843) John Ruskin, a keen climber, felt a spiritual response to the mountains that stretched toward heaven and were “the
centres not only of imaginative energy, but of purity”. Ruskin was a great admirer of J.M.W. Turner, who painted the swirling colours and vertiginous heights of the Alps.
Friedrich’s Wanderer above the Sea of Fog (1817), his most famous work, portrays a man with curly red hair and green-velvet coat triumphantly standing on a mountain top. He surveys the
peaks that rise through the fog below him like massive shrouded fingers reaching for the sky. The mountain landscape that surrounds him is also seen through the spaces between his bent
right arm, his spread legs and his thin tilted cane. The Wanderer has a Greta Garbo-like desire to be alone, and looks far out and in deep. But it’s difficult for him to turn round and
retreat without falling from his precarious perch and immersing himself in nature by plunging into the abyss.
In The Concept of Dread (1844), the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard (not mentioned in the catalogue) captured the mood of this painting by using the example of a man standing on the
edge of a tall cliff: “When the man looks over the edge, he experiences an aversion to the possibility of falling, but at the same time, the man feels a terrifying impulse to throw himself
intentionally off the edge. That experience is anxiety or dread because of our complete freedom to choose to either throw oneself off or to stay put.”
Friedrich’s reputation was as precarious as his Wanderer. A contributor notes that by1820 “most of his canvases had entered private collections, where, hidden from public view, they sank
swiftly into oblivion. And so did Friedrich himself.” He was largely forgotten after his death in 1840. The 1906 German Centenary Exhibition in Berlin rediscovered Friedrich and recognized
him as a great painter. But his reputation sank again when he became one of Hitler’s favorite painters. It was revived once again in the giant retrospective at the Hamburger Kunsthalle in
1974. The impressive current exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum pays him a well-deserved tribute. Kenneth Clark’s Landscape into Art (1949) brilliantly summarised Friedrich’s great
achievement: “No one has expressed more poignantly the gloom of solitude and the sadness of unfulfilled expectation.”
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and our Privacy Policy.
If an account exists for this email address, you will shortly receive an email from us. You will then need to:
Please note, this link will only be valid for 24 hours. If you do not receive our email, please check your Junk Mail folder and add [email protected] to your safe list.