Afghanistan: what went wrong and was it worth it?

Afghanistan: what went wrong and was it worth it?


Play all audios:

Loading...

As British and American forces have been withdrawn from Afghanistan over the past few months, many people will have been thinking of the families of troops who died there: 454 British deaths


between 2001 and 2015 — when UK forces withdrew from combat operations — and 2,372 American deaths overall. Sorrow at the terrible death toll caused by the war among the Afghan civilian


population during the last 20 years — at least 48,000, but this is only the lowest authoritative estimate — is less often expressed. 


The Taliban — the name means students (of the Qur’ān) — are closing in fast. People may remember in better times the BBC reporting from Herat in Western Afghanistan, now under siege, and


about the south western province of Helmand, a former hell-hole for British troops, now facing the seemingly imminent fall of Lashkar-Gah, its provincial capital. Future Afghan or US Air


Force bombing of areas occupied by the Taliban means that more civilians as well as combatants will die. 


Britain and America completed the withdrawal of their few remaining ground troops and contractors a month ago, leaving residual technical support only. Air support, operating long-distance


now from the Gulf, is much reduced. The speed with which the Taliban moved into major cities, or emerged within them, was unexpected. There are reports of many displaced people moving into


the capital, Kabul. Journalists are risking their lives reporting from receding frontlines. Accounts contradict each other. On the one hand there is the morale-boosting optimism of General


Sami Sadat, the former Afghan National Army Commander in Helmand, trained in both Germany and UK, claiming that the insurgents will be beaten back by special forces. On the other, there is


the pessimism of Afghans themselves in threatened cities, giving often contradictory accounts of the Taliban’s rapid assumption of control and their brutal behaviour. 


Hopes that the Taliban’s ideology had mellowed since 2001 are over. There are many reports of the savagery of Taliban assaults and the aftermath of their occupation of the first major urban


areas – forced marriages of women to their fighters and mass executions of anyone associated with withdrawn foreign forces.  If anything, the Taliban’s perverse interpretation of Islam has


hardened since the beginning of the American-led Operation Enduring Freedom and the invasion of Nato coalition troops from 2001-2002. 


It is difficult to remember that foreign intervention in Afghanistan was originally intended to destroy Al-Qaeda’s safe havens there. This war aim required defeating and chasing the Taliban


out of the cities. But this in turn led to a near impossible goal: a commitment to the long haul of building democracy, stability and a modicum of security in an alien, and poorly


understood, social, ethnic, religious and political culture. The combination of cultural solidarity among ethnic Pashtuns, who compose nearly half the population and predominate amongst the


Taliban, anti-foreigner nationalism, and the quest for an imagined 7th-century religious Caliphate, have for two decades sustained the Taliban as a guerrilla force which could not be


dislodged. In addition, covert cross-border support from the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) meant that the coalition faced into a very strong headwind. Trying to conjure a


modern liberal democratic state into existence in these circumstances was hubristic and has been cruelly punished.


Surprise at the effectiveness of the current Taliban offensive is not the only misplaced reaction. Given the disappearance of active Nato military power and the prospect of a victory for a


powerful Islamic extremist organisation, it was predictable that foreign extremists seeking a new caliphate would be drawn to Afghanistan. And likewise that these opportunist incomers would


somehow believe that “Allah the merciful, the compassionate” demanded first and foremost jihad and the subjugation of women. There was an obvious precedent. Al-Qaeda itself had been created


from similar “martyrdom migrants”, mostly Arabs led by Osama bin Laden, sucked into Afghanistan to fight the occupying Soviets. In the 1990s it even had covert US support.


Afghanistan today is a failed state: insecure, unstable and with little hope of democracy prevailing. It is marauding rival militias who should now be expected to emerge. It might seem that


not a single coalition political objective has been achieved. But there have been successes. There are indications that the nearly 30 per cent of the population who are urban-based, in the


main, have different expectations of their government. Amongst them there is strong support expressed for the hoped-for democracy and stability promised by the West. In rural areas under


Taliban control, hopes for cultural change or indeed any modernisation are evidently weaker and now seem far-fetched. 


But it is important to remember the many individual Afghans who actively supported the allied cause. For them, on 29 July, President Biden got a bipartisan billion dollar support and


assistance bill through Congress aimed at protecting those whose lives were now in danger because of their work for Nato forces and the elected Afghan government. Already 8,000 US visas have


been issued and the application process is being streamlined. The response of the British government to the danger threatening our own loyal “collaborators” recently elicited expressions of


“grave concern” from no fewer than 40 military chiefs, including six former heads of our armed forces. They questioned the rejection in the past three months of some 500 asylum applications


from interpreters, drivers, cooks and others who had worked for our military and pointed to the danger that such mean spiritedness would “dishonour” the British armed forces. Their pleas,


and those of their military advocates, ought not to go unheard in Whitehall and Westminster.


Was it worth it? The bitter judgement of many bereaved relatives of soldiers — “no, it wasn’t” — must be respected. But for almost twenty years some fourteen million Afghani women and girls


had the doors of education and participation in public life wedged open for them. Even as the doors are shutting we need to remember the many Afghan parents who want their daughters


educated; they have not changed their minds and nothing can take the experience of education away from the young people who received it. Those who died fighting the Taliban gave their own


futures so that girls and women through education could hope for and aspire to a better future. That is not a wasted life.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and our Privacy Policy.


If an account exists for this email address, you will shortly receive an email from us. You will then need to:


Please note, this link will only be valid for 24 hours. If you do not receive our email, please check your Junk Mail folder and add [email protected] to your safe list.