
Harvey weinstein’s lawyers argue the alleged perv is the real victim during erratic closing arguments: ‘he’s the one who’s being abused’
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
Disgraced movie producer Harvey Weinstein is the “poster boy” of cancel culture, his defense attorney ranted during erratic closing arguments, insisting the convicted sex pest is the real
victim of the women accusing him of rape. “They’re using their youth, their beauty, their charm, their charisma to get stuff from him,” defense attorney Arthur Aidala said Tuesday of the
three women who testified against the once-powerful Hollywood kingpin during his ongoing sex-crimes retrial in Manhattan Superior Court. “I know it’s going to sound crazy, but he’s the one
who’s being abused. He’s the one who’s getting used.” During the three-hour speech to jurors, Aidala portrayed the relationships between Weinstein and his three accusers — fromer TV
production assistant Miriam “Mimi” Haley, Polish model Kaja Sokola and former actress Jessica Mann — as “transactional” sexual relationships that were consensual. He claimed the victims are
women with broken dreams “who wanted to cut the line” to stardom. The attorney’s animated theatrics balanced a tightrope of absurdity — from mockingly impersonating one of the women to
entering the witness stand to discus his own sex life, with his wife in attendance — in an effort to dissuade jurors from reconvicting the one-time movie mogul. “They needed to get the
poster boy, the original sinner for the MeToo movement,” Aidala said, referring to prosecutor’s decision for a retrial. “They tried to do it five years ago, and there was a redo, and they’re
trying to do it again.” At one point, Aidala took shots at Weinstein’s physical appearance, calling the hulking wheelchair-bound ex-Miramax boss a “fat dude” incapable of “playing naked
Twister” – a hyperbole to how witnesses have described the “Pulp Fiction” producer’s sinister demeanor during the alleged attacks. EXPLORE MORE “Some of these descriptions from these women
sound like ‘Cirque du Soleil’!” Aidala charged. The former studio chief’s attorney even posed a hypothetical scenario to jurors about a broken shard of glass falling into his own Grandma’s
“Sunday Sauce” — likening it to the prosecution’s case and the accusers and whether his grandma would still serve the pasta knowing the risk. “If there’s a doubt about his life, their case —
you’ve got to throw it out, you’ve got to throw it out,” he said. Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg fiercely challenged Aidala’s spirited remarks, telling the jury that
Weinstein — accused of sexual conduct by more than 80 women — wielded his “power and influence” to trap his victims. “This was not a courting game as Mr. Aidala wants you to believe,”
Blumberg charged at the jury. “This is not a transaction. This is not people the defendant was fooling around with unless fooling around with is a euphemism for rape… it wasn’t about fooling
around — it was rape.” Blumberg later argued: “He never had an interest in their careers. He had an interest in their bodies,” where no meant “try a little bit harder” until he eventually
“took it anyway.” Weinstein, 73, who has maintained his innocence, faces up to 25 years in prison on two counts of first-degree criminal sexual act, and four years in prison on a charge of
third-degree rape. He was originally convicted at trial in 2022, but New York’s highest court reversed the conviction last year. Weinstein was separately convicted of rape in California
after an Italian model testified that he threw himself on her after appearing uninvited outside her hotel room during an Italian film festival in 2013. The convicted sex fiend was sentenced
to 16 years in prison in that case but is appealing. The prosecution will continue with closing arguments Wednesday morning.