Combined effects of biochar and biodegradable mulch film on chromium bioavailability and the agronomic characteristics of tobacco

ABSTRACT Biochar (BC) and biodegradable mulch film (BMF) are both commonly used means of production in agriculture. In recent years, most studies have focused on the effects of BC or BMF on

soil heavy metal pollution, while they have neglected the combined effects. In this study, a pot experiment was conducted to examine the impacts of BMF, BC, and combined BMF and BC (CMB) on

the mobility of chromium (Cr) and the agronomic characteristics of flue-cured tobacco. Compared with the control, BMF, BC, and CMB significantly reduced the concentrations of

diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) extractable Cr in soils by 29.07–29.75%, 45.35–48.54%, and 34.21–37.92%, respectively. In comparison to the application of BMF and BC alone,

co-application reduced the availability of Cr in soil via increasing the adsorption of soil Cr and soil enzyme activity, which resulted in the decrease of Cr content and bioconcentration

factor and in plants. Moreover, the combined application increased the plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, total root area, root tip number, and root activity of tobacco, which leaded to

increase in leaf and root biomass by 11.40–67.01% and 23.91–50.74%, respectively. Therefore, the application of CMB can reduce the heavy metal residues in tobacco leaves and improve tobacco

yield and quality. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS HEAVY METALS IMMOBILIZATION AND IMPROVEMENT IN MAIZE (_ZEA MAYS_ L.) GROWTH AMENDED WITH BIOCHAR AND COMPOST Article Open access 16

September 2021 ENHANCING SOIL HEALTH, MICROBIAL COUNT, AND HYDROPHILIC METHOMYL AND HYDROPHOBIC LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN REMEDIATION WITH BIOCHAR AND NANO-BIOCHAR Article Open access 22 August

2024 IMPACT OF BIOCHAR ON THE DEGRADATION RATES OF THREE PESTICIDES BY VEGETABLES AND ITS EFFECTS ON SOIL BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS Article Open access 28 August 2024

INTRODUCTION Chromium (Cr), the seventh most abundant element on Earth1, is classified as the first carcinogenic element2 and is also considered the fifth of the potentially toxic elements

(PTEs)3. In industrial production, Cr is usually discharged into the environment through wastewater and waste gas, where it pollutes and polluting water, soil, and crops. With the increase

of Cr pollution, soil pH, alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen, and urease and sucrase activities all decrease4. The accumulation of Cr in plants causes stressors that hinder their growth, resulting

in decreased crop production and quality as growing time is extended5,6. Moreover, Cr can enter the human body through the food chain and seriously endanger human health7 due to its

carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects on humans and animals8,9. Consequently, the effective remediation and usage of Cr-contaminated soil are critical to promoting sustainable

land use and ensuring crop production safety and human health. Currently, several methods have been proposed to remove heavy metals (HMs) from water and soil, including phytoremediation,

physical remediation, chemical remediation, and bioremediation10. Physical remediation refers to the use of physical engineering measures to remove Cr. Although this method has advantages

because it is timely and effective, physical remediation generally requires extensive engineering and investment, and the migration of contaminated soil may cause secondary pollution. In

addition, this method is not suitable for remediating large-scale pollution11. Chemical remediation of soil refers to the addition of chemical agents to contaminated soil to change the

morphology and valence state of Cr, and reduce the fluidity and toxicity of Cr12. However, some chemical remediation methods cause the soil to lose its value for cultivation, and may even

cause secondary soil pollution. The bioremediation pathways of Cr in soil include adsorption by animals, plants, and microorganisms13. Currently, most of the reports on Cr adsorption by

microorganisms are concentrated in the laboratory stage, and less attention has been paid to the application of this technology in this field. Recently, the use of biochar (BC) as an

environmental sorbent has become one of the most attractive research hotspots due to its advantages, including abundant raw materials, easy preparation, and stable performance14,15,16. In

addition, BC plays an important role in decreasing the availability of HMs and plant HMs17,18,19. More importantly, BC can increase crop yields through improving soil fertility and can

remediate soil via immobilizing HMs20,21. In previous studies, applying BC to contaminated soil in tanneries was found to be an effective way to reduce Cr toxicity and promote plant health

and growth22,23. In addition, BC demonstrated a comprehensive effect on paddy soil properties, soil microbial communities, soil aggregates, and Cr mobility; improved the soil carbon

sequestration capacity; and reduced the accumulation of Cr in rice grains24. Therefore, BC as a green environmental adsorbent, has great advantages in remediating heavy metal pollution.

China is the largest tobacco producer in the world, with a tobacco planting area of about 1.08 million hectares and an annual tobacco output of about 2.1 million tons25. Mulching is often

used as an important way to improve the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. However, the long-term and continuous use of plastic mulch results in the deposition of residual plastic film

into the soil, culminating in irreversible soil pollution26,27,28. In recent years, to mitigate the negative effects of residual plastic mulch in the soil, the use of biodegradable mulch

film (BMF) has increased29. The use of BMF reduces soil damage and has a positive effect on soil heavy metal levels. Studies have shown that after 6 weeks of BMF degradation, the soil Cr

levels are reduced30 and the existence of BMF reduces the bioavailability of metals in some cases31,32,33,34. However, there are few studies on the effects of combined BC and BMF (CMB) on Cr

mobility in a tobacco-planting soil. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the objectives to (i) investigate impacts of the tobacco straw waste derived BC and BMF co-application

on reducing soil available Cr and bioaccumulation in different parts of tobacco plants, (ii) the impacts of CMB on soil nutrient and enzyme activities were studied and (iii) the impacts of

CMB on the growth and yield of tobacco crop. MATERIALS AND METHODS MATERIALS The soils were selected from 0 to 20 cm of the cultivated layer in the tobacco-growing area of Pingba country in

Guizhou province, China. The soil type is classified as a yellow loam (Chinese Soil Taxonomy). The basic physico-chemical properties of tobacco-growing soil are as follows: soil pH of 5.99;

organic matter content of 45.16 g/kg; and available N, P, and K contents of 187.92, 17.85, and 1121.12 mg/kg, respectively. The BMF is commercially available with homogeneous and dense and

without fractures, and its main component is a polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT). The density of BMF was 1.38 g/cm3, and thickness was 0.008 mm. The BC was produced made locally

using flue-cured tobacco stems as raw material, which was converted into BC at a pyrolysis temperature of 500 °C under anaerobic conditions. Flue-cured tobacco stems was pyrolyzed at 500 °C

in a horizontal fixed-bed (internal diameter of 4.5 cm and 24 cm long) reactor, the pyrolysis temperature was increased at a rate of 100 °C /min until the desired temperatures were reached,

and then 2 h residence time was applied to perform slow pyrolysis process under 50 L/min nitrogen gas atmosphere, after which cooled down to 500 °C with the continuous flow of nitrogen. Its

basic physico-chemical indexes include pH (9.92); conductivity (5.5 µS/cm); solid yields (29.44%); ash content (12.51%). POT EXPERIMENT The experimental research and field studies on plants

(either cultivated or wild), including the collection of plant material, are comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. The Cr-contaminated

soil was prepared by mixing 8.0 kg of soil in each pot with a certain volume of Cr(NO3)3 solution before the experiment. The artificial contaminated soil contained a Cr concentration of 150 

mg/kg. Subsequently, the homogeneous mixture was dried naturally, and BC and BMF were added after 30 days. The experiment included four treatments with three replicates as follows: no

amendments (CK), biodegradable mulch film (BMF) amendment, biochar (BC) amendment, and combined biodegradable mulch film and biochar (CMB) amendment (Table 1). A total of 28 experimental

pots were set up. The soil was air-dried, passed through a sieve with 2-mm mesh size, and mixed with compound fertilizer of flue-cured tobacco (54.55 g per pot and N:P2O5:K2O = 1:1:2.5), and

healthy tobacco plant seedlings (Yunyan 87) of the same age and consistent growth were transplanted into each pot. The potted plants were fertilized again (30 g per pot and N:P2O5:K2O = 

1:1:2.5) after 30 days. One tobacco seedling was planted in each pot. During the growth of the tobacco, crop cultivation management was consistent with normal production practices, with

regular weeding, insect killing, and watering. After 50 days, three repeats were randomly selected for each treatment to be the first crop samples. The remaining four pots from each

treatment were the second crop samples, which continued to grow for 100 days. SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS SOIL PHYSICOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS Soil samples in the incubation experiment were collected

every 50 days. The electrical conductivity and soil pH were measured in a soil–water suspension (1:5 ratio, w/v) using a potentiometric method35. The soil organic matter content was

determined using the potassium dichromate volumetric method36. The alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method was used to determine the soil available nitrogen content37. The soil available

phosphorus content was determined spectrophotometrically using a continuous flow analyzer (SAN +  + , Skalar Analytical B.V., Breda, the Netherlands)38. The soil available potassium was

extracted with 1.0 M of ammonium acetate for 30 min and the content was determined using flame photometry37. SOIL CR ANALYSIS The total Cr content was determined using a microwave digester

(Speedwave Xpert, Berghof, Germany). Specifically, samples (0.2 g) were digested with a dup-acid mixture of HF (1 mL) and HNO3 (8 mL), and the residual solution was filtered through 0.22-μm

membrane filters and diluted to 50 mL39. The available Cr was analyzed using the diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) extraction method and then subjected to inductively coupled

plasma-mass spectrometry Agilent 7700 ICP-MS (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) analysis with a limit of quantification of 0.03 μg/L. SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY ANALYSIS The catalase

activity was determined by back-titrating the residual hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with potassium permanganate (KMnO4)40. The urease activity of the soil was determined using the sodium

phenolate-sodium hypochlorite colorimetric method41. The soil fluorescein diacetate hydrolase activity was determined colorimetrically using fluorescein diacetate as substrate at 490 nm42.

PLANT ANALYSIS The plants were thoroughly washed with deionized water and divided into three parts (the root, stem, and leaf). The Cr concentration in plant organs was determined by applying

acidic-oxidant microwave digestion with a mixture of Suprapur® grade HNO3 65% and H2O2 30% 7/2 (v/v), followed by ICP-MS analysis43. A root scanning analysis system (WinRHIZO, Regent

Instrument, Canada) was used to analyze root biological properties such as the root length, root surface area, root volume, average root diameter, and root tip number. Root activity was

determined in 0.2 g root samples using the 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) method44. The survey items included the plant height, stem circumference, effective leaf number, and

leaf area. The leaf area was calculated as d = (L + 2 W)/3, where d, L, and W represent the leaf area, maximum leaf length, and maximum leaf width, respectively. The number of leaves was

counted, and the plant height was measured. The plants were separated into roots, stems, and leaves, and the fresh biomass of each component was weighed45. Each obtained whole tobacco plant

sample was placed at 115 °C for 25 min to inactivate the cells and then dried at 55 °C and weighed to obtain the dry matter mass of the tobacco plant44. QUALITY CONTROL AND DATA ANALYSES For

accuracy and precision of data, the certified standards were used in each batch of plant extraction. All the treatments were conducted in triplicate. Data were presented as the means with

standard deviations. Statistical analysis of the experimental data was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the SPSS 22.0 statistical software package (SPSS Inc.,

Chicago, IL, USA). The means of the data were compared based on the least significant difference (Duncan) test at a 5% significance level46. The bio-concentration factor (BCF) and

translocation factor (TF) were calculated as follows: $$\text{BCF} = \frac{{\text{C}}_{{\text{Cr}} \, {\text{in}} \, {\text{plant}} \, {\text{tissue}}}}{{\text{C}}_{{\text{Cr}} \,

{\text{in}} \, {\text{soil}}}}\text{,}$$ $$\text{TF} = \frac{{\text{C}}_{\text{Cr in shoot}}}{{\text{C}}_{\text{Cr in root}}}\text{,}$$ where CCr in plant tissue is the concentration of Cr

in the roots, stems, and leaves, and CCr in soil is the concentration of Cr in soil. CCr in shoot is the concentration of Cr in leaves and stems and CCr in root is the concentration of Cr in

roots. RESULTS CHANGES OF TOTAL CR CONTENT AND DTPA-EXTRACTABLE CR IN SOIL Compared with the CK treatment, the total Cr contents in the BC and CMB treatments on the 50th day of tobacco

transplantation increased by 132.58% and 194.38%, respectively (Fig. 1). On the 100th day of tobacco transplantation, the total Cr contents in the BC and CMB treatments increased by 76.12%

and 78.36%, respectively. There were significant differences in the total Cr content between the CMB treatment and CK at both day 50 and day 100. Moreover, the combined application of BMF

and BC significantly improved the soil Cr content compared to the application of BMF and BC alone. In comparison with CK, the DTPA-extractable Cr significantly decreased in soil treated with

BC, BMF, and CMB at both 50 and 100 days (Fig. 2), and the concentration of DTPA-extractable Cr in all treatments decreased gradually with incubation time. Compared with CK, the

DTPA-extractable Cr contents in the BMF, BC, and CMB treatments were significantly lower at 50 days by 29.75%, 48.54%, and 34.21%, respectively. At 100 days, the decrease in DTPA-extractable

Cr was more pronounced, and the concentrations of DTPA-extractable Cr in BMF, BC, and CMB were significantly reduced by 29.07%, 45.35%, and 37.92%, respectively. It was observed that CMB

significantly decreased the concentration of DTPA-extractable Cr with incubation time. CHANGES OF ENZYME ACTIVITY IN SOIL Compared with CK, the BC and CMB treatments significantly increased

the urease activities of soil, and soil urease activities in the BC and CMB treatments increased by 41.94% and 37.92% at 50 days, respectively, and by 81.98% and 61.78% at 100 days,

respectively (Fig. 3). Of the four treatments, BC had the highest urease activity, followed by CMB, BMF, and CK, and the soil urease activity in all treatments increased with incubation

time. Compared with CK, the catalase activities in the BMF, BC, and CMB treatments significantly increased by 23.19%, 26.60%, and 41.60% at 50 days, respectively, and by 6.68%, 29.07%, and

27.43% at 100 days, respectively. Compared with CK, the soil FDA hydrolase activities after 50 days were significantly increased by 35.35%, 59.06%, and 67.98% in the BMF, BC, and CMB

treatments, respectively. Compared with the CK treatment, the soil FDA hydrolase activity was significantly increased by 30.94%, 53.55%, and 37.00% in the BMF, BC, and CMB treatments on the

100th day of tobacco transplantation, respectively. In a word, the results show that BMF, BC, and CMB can significantly increase soil enzyme activity with incubation time. CHANGES IN THE CR

CONTENT, BCF, AND TF IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO Compared with CK, the Cr contents in roots were significantly reduced by 42.05%, 60.02%, and 59.48% in the BMF, BC, and CMB treatments,

respectively (Fig. 4a). However, there were no significant differences between the BMF, BC, and CMB treatments. Compared with CK, the Cr contents in stems were significantly reduced by

15.25%, 55.04%, and 49.16% in the BMF, BC, and CMB treatments, respectively, and the stem Cr content in CMB was significantly different from that in BMF but not significantly different from

that in BC. In comparison with CK, the Cr contents in the leaves of BMF, BC, and CMB treatment samples were significantly reduced by 23.39%, 15.38%, and 32.23%, respectively, while the

differences between CMB and BMF were not significant, and the differences between CMB and BC were significant. Upon the addition of BMF, BC, and CMB, in comparison with CK, the BCFs were

significantly decreased by 57.67%, 73.33%, and 77.67% (Fig. 4b), Among the four groups, CMB had the lowest BCF respectively, while the TFs were significantly increased in BC and CMB. EFFECTS

OF DIFFERENT TREATMENTS ON THE ROOT ACTIVITY, MORPHOLOGY, AND AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF TOBACCO PLANTS Compared with CK, the root activity of flue-cured tobacco increased by 58.13%,

85.20%, and 63.69% in BMF, BC, and CMB, respectively (Fig. 5). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between BMF, BC, and CMB. Compared with CK, the root length, root projected

area, root surface area, and root volume in the BC treatment increased by 57.40%, 65.68%, 69.41%, and 84.13%, respectively (Table 2); the corresponding values in treatment CMB increased by

46.31%, 37.77%, 59.84%, and 50.88%, respectively; and the corresponding values in treatment BMF increased by 16.00%, 10.74%, 38.74%, and 29.22%, respectively. There were no significant

differences in root length, root projection area, root surface area, or root volume area between BMF and CMB, but root volume was significantly different between BC and CMB. Compared with

CK, the productive leaf number, leaf area, and plant height of BC and CMB were significantly increased in two transplantation periods (Table 3, Fig. 6). At day 50, compared with CK, the

productive leaf number of the BC and CMB treatments significantly increased by 30.68% and 26.87%, respectively. The leaf area of the BC and CMB treatments significantly increased by 60.91%

and 60.43%, respectively. The stem biomass of the BC and CMB treatments significantly increased by 100.00% and 61.54%, respectively. The productive leaf number, leaf area, plant height, and

stem biomass were significantly higher in CMB than in BMF, but the difference between CMB and BC was not significant. At day 100, compared with CK, the leaf areas of the BC and CMB

treatments were significantly increased by 57.90% and 68.7%, respectively. The stem biomass of the BC and CMB treatments significantly increased by 135.48% and 118.82%, respectively, and the

leaf biomass significantly increased by 80.67% and 67.01%, respectively. The plant height, stem girth, leaf area, stem biomass, and leaf biomass of the CMB treatment were significantly

higher than those of BMF, but the difference between CMB and BC was not significant. DISCUSSION EFFECTS OF CMB ON SOIL CR AVAILABILITY After the addition of BMF, BC, and CMB, the Cr contents

in the soil of treatments BMF, BC, and CMB increased significantly, while the content of DTPA-extractable Cr decreased significantly (Figs. 1 and 2). Similar results were found by

Refs.47,48 and49. According to previous research, BC is effective in remediating Cr contamination. For example, BC lowered the DTPA-extractable Cr in spinach-planting soil46, BC was shown to

reduce the Cr availability of soil contaminated by tannery waste50, and Zaman et al.23 reported that as wheat straw BC content increased, the content of Cr (DTPA-extracted) in soil fell

significantly. Furthermore, the addition of BMF can reduce the bioavailability of HMs in soil31,34,51. For example, Li et al. found that after 6 weeks of degradation, BMF lowered the heavy

metal contents (Cr, Ba, As, and Pb) in soil30, and Li et al.51 showed that the bioavailability ratio of Cd to As decreased after applying BMF, indicating that BMF had a significant effect on

Cr reduction. Most importantly, Cr was significantly decreased when BC and BMF were administered in combination, which was consistent with Li et al. ’s52 finding that the addition of

microplastics (MPs) to sludge BC could reduce the availability of Cr and Pb, and with the increase of MPs, the Cr leaching content further decreased. Then, all of these statements are

consistent with our research. The reduction in Cr availability in CMB-treated soils may be attributed to the adsorption of HMs by BC. This is due to the high porosity, larger surface area,

cation exchange capacity, and numerous negative surface functional groups present in BC, which play a crucial role in reducing heavy metal mobility through adsorption and precipitation53,54.

Moreover, the application of BC to Cr-contaminated soils increases the organic matter content of the soil, which can facilitate Cr adsorption55,56. In this study, compared to the control,

BC increased the soil organic matter content by 9.02%. Another reason for the reduced Cr availability is the adsorption of HMs by BMF. It has been reported that MPs exhibit a unique property

of adsorbing environmental contaminants, such as HMs57. This is likely due to electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged MPs and the positively charged anodic pole of HMs. In

addition, during the degradation of BMF in soil, more functional groups that can adsorb and interact with HMs are exposed, such as benzene rings, hydroxyl groups, and carboxyl groups51.

Moreover, it has been reported that BC enhances the adhesion of soil particles on the surface of MPs58, because MPs are trapped on the surface of BC during adsorption, metal oxide

nanoparticles enhance adhesion through interaction with MPs59, and the metal-O-PS bonds formed between microplastic particles and the BC surface contribute to the adsorption of HMs in

soil59,60. Therefore, the combined application of BC and BMF reduced the biological effectiveness of soil Cr more effectively than solo applications. EFFECTS OF CMB ON THE AGRONOMIC

CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUE-CURED TOBACCO The addition of CMB not only had a significant effect on reducing soil Cr but also had a positive effect on the growth of flue-cured tobacco. The

addition of CMB significantly promoted the root biological traits and agronomic characteristics of flue-cured tobacco (Tables 2 and 3, Fig. 6). Consistent with the findings of the present

study, BC has been found to exert beneficial effects on crop growth. For example, the development of spinach roots and stems in Cr-contaminated soil increased after the addition of BC46.

Similarly, Bashir et al. concluded that the application of BC to Cr- or Cd-contaminated soil greatly increased plant height61, while the application of wheat straw BC to Cr-contaminated soil

significantly enhanced tomato plant biomass23. Furthermore, BMF also has a positive effect on the growth of crops, many studies have been conducted in which the application of BMF to

maize62,63,64 and cotton increased yields65. This suggests that the addition of CMB can also improve crop growth. One of the reasons why CMB promotes the growth of flue-cured tobacco is that

the improvement of plant growth may depend on the adsorption of soil HMs onto BC and BMF. In the present study, after adding CMB, compared to CK, the bioavailability of Cr in soil was

significantly reduced by 37%, and the root, stem, and leaf Cr concentrations in plants were correspondingly reduced by 59.48%, 49.15%, and 32.21%, respectively, which led to a decrease in

the transfer and toxicity of Cr to plants4, and promoted plant growth. The favorable influence of BC and BMF on soil qualities was another reason why CMB improved the growth of flue-cured

tobacco. In this study, it was observed that the addition of BC increased the soil urease activities, catalase activities, soil FDA hydrolase activities, and soil organic matter content by

81.98%, 29.07%, 53.55%, and 9.02% respectively, compared to the CK treatment, which led to an optimized tobacco growth environment66,67 and improved crop growth. Moreover, BMF also

significantly increased catalase activities and FDA hydrolase activities by 23.19% and 30.96% respectively, which was consistent with previous findings that BMF improved soil urease and soil

catalase activities68, thereby improving plant growth. After degradation, the residual plastic film fragmented, thinned, become brittle, and clung to the surface, where it continued to play

a role in increasing temperature and preserving soil moisture68, thus promoting the growth of tobacco. Therefore, CMB can been added to soil to promote the growth of flue-cured tobacco.

CONCLUSIONS The combination of BMF and BC clearly reduced the Cr bioavailability in tobacco-growing soil. The CMB treatment dramatically decreased the tobacco Cr contents and enhanced the

tobacco biomass through boosting soil enzyme activity and reducing Cr toxicity. Compared to CK, the bioavailability of soil Cr in the CMB treatment decreased by 34.21–37.92%; the urease

activities, catalase activities, and FDA hydrolase activities significantly increased by 37.92–61.78%, 27.43–41.60%, and 37.06–67.98%, respectively; and the stem and leaf biomass of tobacco

increased by 118.82% and 67.01%, respectively. These results showed that BC alone or combined with BMF can reduce the Cr bioavailability of soil and Cr accumulation in tobacco leaves, which

is beneficial to food safety and human health. However, the results of this study are based on pot experiments, and a large field trial is required to verify the combined effects of BC and

BMF on Cr bioavailability and the agronomic characteristics of tobacco. DATA AVAILABILITY The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon

reasonable request. REFERENCES * Xie, Y. _et al._ Transcriptome-based gene profiling provides novel insights into the characteristics of radish root response to Cr stress with

next-generation sequencing. _Front. Plant Sci._ 6, 202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00202 (2015). Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhitkovich, A. Chromium in drinking

water: Sources, metabolism, and cancer risks. _Chem. Res. Toxicol._ 24(10), 1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx200251t (2011). Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ma,

H., Hung, M. & Chen, P. A systemic health risk assessment for the chromium cycle in Taiwan. _Environ. Int._ 33(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.09.011 (2007). Article 

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mendez, A. _et al._ Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil. _Chemosphere_ 89(11), 1354–1359.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.092 (2012). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Shahid, M. _et al._ Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and

detoxification in soil-plant system: A review. _Chemosphere_ 178, 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.074 (2017). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wakeel, A.

& Xu, M. Chromium morpho-phytotoxicity. _Plants-Basel_ 9(5), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050564 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Li, Q. _et al._ The effect of phosphate

mining activities on rhizosphere bacterial communities of surrounding vegetables and crops. _Sci. Total Environ._ 821, 153479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153479 (2022). Article

  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chrysochoou, M., Johnston, C. P. & Dahal, G. A comparative evaluation of hexavalent chromium treatment in contaminated soil by calcium polysulfide

and green-tea nanoscale zero-valent iron. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 201–202, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.003 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Speer, R. M. _et

al._ The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of particulate and soluble hexavalent chromium in leatherback sea turtle lung cells. _Aquat. Toxicol._ 198, 149–157.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.03.003 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chen, R. Q. _et al._ Surface-modified biochar with polydentate binding sites for

the removal of cadmium. _Int. J. Mol. Sci._ 20(7), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20071775 (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Liu, L. _et al._ Remediation techniques for heavy

metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. _Sci. Total Environ._ 633, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.161 (2018). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  * Bao, Z. _et al._ Method and mechanism of chromium removal from soil: A systematic review. _Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int._ 29(24), 35501–35517.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19452-z (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Peters, R. W. Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. _J. Hazard. Mater._

66(1–2), 151–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00010-2 (1999). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gao, R. _et al._ Remediation of Pb, Cd, and Cu contaminated soil by

co-pyrolysis biochar derived from rape straw and orthophosphate: Speciation transformation, risk evaluation and mechanism inquiry. _Sci. Total Environ._ 730, 139119.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139119 (2020). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Liu, H. _et al._ Effect of modified coconut shell biochar on availability of heavy metals

and biochemical characteristics of soil in multiple heavy metals contaminated soil. _Sci. Total Environ._ 645, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.115 (2018). Article  ADS

  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhang, T. K. _et al._ Combined effects of biochar and inhibitors on greenhouse gas emissions, global warming potential, and nitrogen use efficiency in the

tobacco field. _Sustainability_ 15(7), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076100 (2023). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Maqbool, Z. _et al._ Unlocking the potential of biochar in the

remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals for sustainable agriculture. _Funct. Plant Biol._ https://doi.org/10.1071/FP23257 (2024). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Muhammad, N.

_et al._ Impacts of pyrolysis temperatures on physicochemical and structural properties of green waste derived biochars for adsorption of potentially toxic elements. _J. Environ. Manag._

317, 115385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115385 (2022). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, X. _et al._ Effect of biochars on the immobilization and form of Cadmium (Cd) in

simulated Cd deposition of iron rich soils. _Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf._ 272, 116045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116045 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hu, Q. _et

al._ Effects of residual plastic-film mulch on field corn growth and productivity. _Sci. Total Environ._ 729, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138901 (2020). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Mak-Mensah, E. _et al._ Influence of plastic film mulch with biochar application on crop yield, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in northern China: A meta-analysis.

_Peerj_ 9, e10967. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10967 (2021). Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bashir, M. A. _et al._ Biochar mediated-alleviation of chromium stress and

growth improvement of different maize cultivars in tannery polluted soils. _Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health_ 18(9), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094461 (2021). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Zaman, A. _et al._ Toxicity assessment and phytostabilization of contaminated soil by using wheat straw-derived biochar in tomato plants. _Gesunde Pflanzen_ 74(3), 705–713.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00646-x (2022). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhou, J. _et al._ Biochar amendment of chromium-polluted paddy soil suppresses greenhouse gas emissions

and decreases chromium uptake by rice grain. _J. Soils Sediments_ 19(4), 1756–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2170-5 (2018). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ahmed, W. _et al._

Plant-microbe interaction: mining the impact of native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-10 on tobacco bacterial wilt disease and rhizosphere microbial communities. _Microbiol. Spectr._ 10(4),

e0147122. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01471-22 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gu, X. B. _et al._ Effects of degradable film mulching on crop yield and water use

efficiency in China: A meta-analysis. _Soil Till. Res._ 202, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104676 (2020). Article  Google Scholar  * Saglam, M. _et al._ Modeling the effect of

biodegradable paper and plastic mulch on soil moisture dynamics. _Agric. Water Manag._ 193, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.011 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Zhang, M.

_et al._ Effect of long-term biodegradable film mulch on soil physicochemical and microbial properties. _Toxics_ 10(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030129 (2022). Article  CAS 

PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Nelson, T. F. _et al._ Quantification of synthetic polyesters from biodegradable mulch films in soils. _Environ. Sci. Technol._ 54(1), 266–275.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05863 (2020). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Li, R. _et al._ Effect of prothioconazole on the degradation of microplastics derived from

mulching plastic film: Apparent change and interaction with heavy metals in soil. _Environ. Pollut._ 260, 113988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113988 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Dong, Y. _et al._ Effect of microplastics and arsenic on nutrients and microorganisms in rice rhizosphere soil. _Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf._ 211, 111899.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111899 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Feng, X. _et al._ Microplastics change soil properties, heavy metal availability and bacterial

community in a Pb-Zn-contaminated soil. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 424(Pt A), 127364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127364 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yu, H. _et al._

Decrease in bioavailability of soil heavy metals caused by the presence of microplastics varies across aggregate levels. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 395, 122690.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122690 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yu, H. _et al._ Metal type and aggregate microenvironment govern the response sequence of

speciation transformation of different heavy metals to microplastics in soil. _Sci. Total Environ._ 752, 141956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141956 (2021). Article  ADS  CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wu, X. _et al._ Differences in allometric relationship of two dominant woody species among various terrains in a desert region of Central Asia. _Front. Plant Sci._

12, 754887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.754887 (2021). Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhang, J., Wang, Y. & Cai, C. Multielemental stoichiometry in plant

organs: A case study with the alpine herb _Gentiana_ _rigescens_ across Southwest China. _Front. Plant Sci._ 11, 441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00441 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed

Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * He, F. Response of root-associated bacterial communities to different degrees of soft rot damage in amorphophallus konjac under a _Robinia_ _pseudoacacia_

plantation. _Front. Microbiol._ 12, 652758. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.652758 (2021). Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chen, J. _et al._ Effects of conventional and

organic agriculture on soil Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community in low-quality farmland. _Front. Microbiol._ 13, 914627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.914627 (2022). Article 

PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Khadhar, S. _et al._ Integration of sequential extraction, chemical analysis and statistical tools for the availability risk assessment of heavy

metals in sludge amended soils. _Environ. Pollut._ 263, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114543 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yang, D. _et al._ Effects of soil tillage,

management practices, and mulching film application on soil health and peanut yield in a continuous cropping system. _Front. Microbiol._ 11, 570924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.570924

(2020). Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Liu, Z. _et al._ Effects of soil type on trace element absorption and fruit quality of pepper. _Front. Plant Sci._ 12, 698796.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.698796 (2021). Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, L., Li, J. & Zhang, S. A comprehensive network integrating signature microbes

and crucial soil properties during early biological soil crust formation on tropical reef islands. _Front. Microbiol._ 13, 831710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.831710 (2022). Article 

PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fibbi, D. _et al._ Distribution and mass balance of hexavalent and trivalent chromium in a subsurface, horizontal flow (SF-h) constructed wetland

operating as post-treatment of textile wastewater for water reuse. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 199–200, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.089 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Ren, T. _et al._ Biochar increases tobacco yield by promoting root growth based on a three-year field application. _Sci. Rep._ 11(1), 21991.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01426-9 (2021). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhang, J. _et al._ Effect of tobacco stem-derived biochar on soil metal

immobilization and the cultivation of tobacco plant. _J. Soils Sediments_ 19(5), 2313–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02226-x (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sehrish, A. K.

_et al._ Effect of poultry litter biochar on chromium (Cr) bioavailability and accumulation in spinach (_Spinacia_ _oleracea_) grown in Cr-polluted soil. _Arab. J. Geosci._ 12(2), 9.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4213-z (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Abbas, A. _et al._ Synergistic use of biochar and acidified manure for improving growth of maize in chromium

contaminated soil. _Int. J. Phytoremediat._ 22(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2019.1644286 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Arabi, Z. _et al._ (Im)mobilization of

arsenic, chromium, and nickel in soils via biochar: A meta-analysis. _Environ. Pollut._ 286, 117199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117199 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  * Muhammad, N. _et al._ Effects of different biochars on physicochemical properties and immobilization of potentially toxic elements in soil—A geostatistical approach. _Chemosphere_ 277,

130350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130350 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Muhammad, N. _et al._ Effect of biochars on bioaccumulation and human health risks

of potentially toxic elements in wheat (_Triticum_ _aestivum_ L.) cultivated on industrially contaminated soil. _Environ. Pollut._ 260, 113887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113887

(2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Li, C. H. _et al._ Polyethylene and poly (butyleneadipate-co-terephthalate)-based biodegradable microplastics modulate the bioavailability and

speciation of Cd and As in soil: Insights into transformation mechanisms. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 445, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130638 (2023). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Li, W. _et al._ Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and metal-free/metal-loaded polyvinyl chloride (PVC) microplastics improved biochar properties and reduced environmental risk of heavy metals.

_Environ. Pollut._ 302, 119092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119092 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ahmad, M. _et al._ Biochar-induced changes in soil properties

affected immobilization/mobilization of metals/metalloids in contaminated soils. _J. Soils Sediments_ 17(3), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1339-4 (2016). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Lu, K. _et al._ Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the bioavailability of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn to Sedum plumbizincicola. _Agric. Ecosyst. Environ._ 191, 124–132.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.010 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kasirajan, S. & Ngouajio, M. Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: A

review. _Agron. Sustain. Dev._ 32(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0068-3 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Steinmetz, Z. _et al._ Plastic mulching in agriculture.

Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation. _Sci. Total Environ._ 550, 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.153 (2016). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Mohamadi, S. _et al._ Abundance and characterization of personal protective equipment (PPE) polluting Kish Island, Persian Gulf. _Sci. Total Environ._ 854, 158678.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158678 (2022). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Shang, Q. & Chi, J. Impact of biochar coexistence with polar/nonpolar

microplastics on phenanthrene sorption in soil. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 447, 130761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130761 (2023). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, J. _et

al._ Adsorption and thermal degradation of microplastics from aqueous solutions by Mg/Zn modified magnetic biochars. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 419, 126486.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126486 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tiwari, E. _et al._ Application of Zn/Al layered double hydroxides for the removal of nano-scale

plastic debris from aqueous systems. _J. Hazard. Mater._ 397, 122769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122769 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bashir, S. _et al._

Sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar reduces the cadmium and chromium bioavailability to mash bean and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil. _J. Soils Sediments_ 18(3), 874–886.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1796-z (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Li, M. _et al._ Biodegradable film mulching promotes better soil quality and increases summer maize grain

yield in North China Plain. _Arch. Agron. Soil Sci._ https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2158327 (2022). Article  Google Scholar  * Yin, M. _et al._ Biodegradable mulching film with an

optimum degradation rate improves soil environment and enhances maize growth. _Agric. Water Manag._ 216, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.004 (2019). Article  Google Scholar

  * Zhang, W. _et al._ Degradability of biodegradable plastic films and its mulching effects on soil temperature and maize yield in northeastern China. _Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng._ 13(2),

146–153. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20201302.5360 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Deng, L. _et al._ The effects of biodegradable mulch film on the growth, yield, and water use

efficiency of cotton and maize in an Arid region. _Sustainability_ https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247039 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * Gao, C. _et al._ Effects of biochar and residual

plastic film on soil properties and root of flue-cured tobacco. _J. Irrig. Drain. Eng._ 148(4), 04022005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001673 (2022). Article  Google Scholar 

* Haider, F. U. _et al._ Co-application of biochar and microorganisms improves soybean performance and remediate cadmium-contaminated soil. _Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf._ 214, 112112.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112112 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yuan, H. _et al._ Degradation performance of oxo-biodegradable plastic films and their effects on

cotton growth. _J. Cotton Sci._ 28(6), 602–608. https://doi.org/10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201606010 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was funded

by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant no. XDB40020201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42263013), the Science and

Technology Program of Guizhou Province (Grant nos. [2021]187, and ZK[2022]047), the Key Research and Development Program of the China Tobacco Corporation (Grant no.110202102038;

110202202030), and the Science and Technology Project of Bijie Tobacco Company of Guizhou Province (Grant no.2022520500240192). Jianzhong Cheng was supported by the Outstanding Youth Funds

of Guizhou Province (YQK[2023]036) and the "Light of West China" Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences. We also thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during

the preparation of this manuscript. FUNDING This study was funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant no. XDB40020201), the National Natural

Science Foundation of China (42263013), the Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province (Grant nos. [2021]187, and ZK[2022]047), the Key Research and Development Program of the China

Tobacco Corporation (Grant no.110202102038; 110202202030), and the Science and Technology Project of Bijie Tobacco Company of Guizhou Province (Grant no.2022520500240192). AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Yuan Tang and Fumin Zuo. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * School of Public Health, the Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and

Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guian New Area, 561113, Guizhou, China Yuan Tang, Fumin Zuo, Changhong Li, Qinghai Zhang & Jianzhong Cheng * Guizhou

Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou, China Weichang Gao * State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences,

Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou, China Jianzhong Cheng Authors * Yuan Tang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fumin Zuo View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Changhong Li View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Qinghai Zhang View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Weichang Gao View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jianzhong Cheng

View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS Conceptualization, W.G. and J.C.; Data curation, Y.T. and F.Z.; Formal analysis, Y.T.;

Funding acquisition, J.C.; Investigation, T.Y. and F.Z.; Methodology, Y.T. and F.Z.; Software, F.Z.; Supervision, W.G. and J.C.; Validation, W.G.; Writing—original draft, Y.T. and F.Z..;

Writing—review and editing, Y.T., F.Z., C.L., Q.Z., W.G. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to

Weichang Gao or Jianzhong Cheng. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains

neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons

Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original

author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the

article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your

intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence,

visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Tang, Y., Zuo, F., Li, C. _et al._ Combined effects of biochar and

biodegradable mulch film on chromium bioavailability and the agronomic characteristics of tobacco. _Sci Rep_ 14, 6867 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56973-8 Download citation *

Received: 20 December 2023 * Accepted: 13 March 2024 * Published: 22 March 2024 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56973-8 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with

will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt

content-sharing initiative KEYWORDS * Biochar * Biodegradable mulch film * Bioavailability * Chromium * Flue-cured tobacco