Pan-cancer analysis reveals igfl2 as a potential target for cancer prognosis and immunotherapy

Pan-cancer analysis reveals igfl2 as a potential target for cancer prognosis and immunotherapy


Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT _Insulin-like growth factor like family member 2_ (_IGFL2_) is a gene in the _IGFL_ family, located on chromosome 19, whose role in cancer is unclear, and the aim of this study was


to investigate the relevance of _IGFL2_ expression, prognosis, immunity, and mutation in pan-cancer. Obtaining information from The Cancer Genome Atlas and The Genotype-Tissue Expression


Project (GTEx) databases for expression analysis and combining with The Gene Expression Profile Interaction Analysis database for prognostic aspects. Analysis of immune cell infiltration by


TIMER and CIBERSORT algorithms. Calculation of correlation of immune-related genes with _IGFL2_ expression and tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability. Mutations and DNA


methylation were analyzed using the cBioPortal database and the UALCAN database, and functional enrichment was performed using Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). _IGFL2_ expression is


significantly elevated in tumor tissue and high expression has a worse prognosis in most cancers. In immune correlation analysis, it was associated with most immune cells and immune-related


genes. In most cancers, _IGFL2_ methylation is lower and the group with mutations in _IGFL2_ has a worse prognosis than the normal group. The GSEA analysis showed that _IGFL2_ was


significantly enriched in signaling and metabolism. _IGFL2_ may be involved in the development of many types of cancer, influencing the course of cancer with different biological functions.


It may also be a biomarker for tumor immunotherapy. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS PAN-CANCER ANALYSIS REVEALS IL32 IS A POTENTIAL PROGNOSTIC AND IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC BIOMARKER IN


CANCER Article Open access 07 April 2024 CONSTRUCTION OF AN IMMUNE-RELATED RISK SCORE SIGNATURE FOR GASTRIC CANCER BASED ON MULTI-OMICS DATA Article Open access 16 January 2024 COMPREHENSIVE


ANALYSIS OF CLEC FAMILY GENES IN GASTRIC CANCER PROGNOSIS IMMUNE RESPONSE AND TREATMENT Article Open access 18 February 2025 INTRODUCTION Cancer remains a disease with very high morbidity


and mortality in epidemiological studies. In 2020, there will be 19.3 million cancer patients and more than 10 million deaths worldwide, with breast cancer being the most common cancer and


lung cancer having the highest mortality rate at 18 percent. 28.4 million people will have cancer by 20401. Tumor immunotherapy has been shown to be effective in cancer treatment by using


immune cells to eliminate tumor cells2.Therefore, predicting biomarkers and identifying tumor treatment targets are crucial in cancer treatment. The human _IGFL_ gene encodes a protein of


approximately 100 amino acids and contains 11 conserved cysteine residues, including two CC motifs. This family consists of four genes and two pseudogenes, _IGFL1-IGFL4_, _IGFL1P1_ and


_IGFL1P2_, all clustered on chromosome 19 at 35 kb intervals, which have structural homology with _the insulin-like growth factor_ (_IGF_) family3. The _IGF_ family of genes is a systemic


growth factor and a major regulator of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis 4. Its dysfunction or dysregulation may destabilize tissues and act on target organs in an autocrine,


paracrine and endocrine manner, while activating various intracellular signaling pathways to promote cell proliferation, transformation and inhibit apoptosis, leading to the development of


malignant tumors 5. _IGF_ family members have been shown to play an important role in a variety of tumorigenesis, such as gastric cancer6, colorectal cancer7, and lung cancer8.Among the


relevant studies on the IGFL family, IGFL2 is particularly well represented and deserves analysis.Studies on _IGFL2_ have found that its expression is upregulated in many cancers, and as a


homolog of the _IGF_ family, this pattern may be consistent with _IGF_ family members. However, the mechanism of _IGFL2_ in various carcinogenesis is unclear and there is a lack of


correlation analysis of _IGFL2_. Herein, we have comprehensively analyzed the expression, prognosis, immunological and biological roles of _IGFL2_ in cancer based on TCGA database data to


explore the multifaceted relationship between _IGFL2_ and cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS DATA ACQUISITION & PROCESSING The expression, clinical correlation, and mutation data for a total


of 10,534 cases of 33 cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) database9, 10 were obtained from the UCSC browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/) for basic


processing of raw data; and the normal tissue information was supplemented with gene data from The Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) (http://gtexportal.org) database11 for normal


tissues. 33 cancer types were included: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma (BLCA), Breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and


endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC), Cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL), Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), Lymphoid Neoplasm Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBC), Esophageal carcinoma (ESCA), Glioblastoma


multiforme (GBM), Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), Kidney Chromophobe (KICH), Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP), Acute


Myeloid Leukemia (LAML), Brain Lower Grade Glioma (LGG), Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), Mesothelioma (MESO), Ovarian


serous cystadenocarcinoma (OV), Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD), Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (PCPG), Prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD), Rectum adenocarcinoma (READ), Sarcoma (SARC),


Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM), Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (TGCT), Thyroid carcinoma (THCA), Thymoma (THYM), Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC),


Uterine Carcinosarcoma (UCS), and Uveal Melanoma (UVM). _IGFL2_ EXPRESSION ANALYSIS The expression of _IGFL2_ in pan-cancer was analyzed using the Timer2.0 (http://timer.cistrome.org/)


online tool12 Since there is too little normal tissue in some cancers, the transcriptome RNA-seq data of TCGA and GETx and normal tissue data were log2 transformed simultaneously to match


the differential expression information between tumor and normal tissue. It was also plotted with R software to determine the changes in _IGFL2_ expression in different cancer types. _p_ 


< 0.05 is statistically significant. CLINICAL DATA CORRELATION ANALYSIS According to the expression of _IGFL2_, the groups were divided into high and low expression groups by median


expression level, and COX regression analysis was performed to investigate the correlation and hazard ratio (HR) between it and the prognosis of different cancers, and the correlation


between _IGFL2_ and survival was assessed by Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test. Forest plots and K-M curves were plotted. In addition, clinical staging of selected tumor patients was


analyzed using The Gene Expression Profile Interaction Analysis (GEPIA) (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) database13 to investigate whether expression correlated with clinical staging.


RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN _IGFL2_ EXPRESSION AND IMMUNITY Cell type identification was performed using TIMER and the CIBERSORT algorithm14 to assess the relationship between _IGFL2_ expression


and 22 immune cell subtypes based on expression files. The most commonly used drugs in immunotherapy target and inhibit the immune checkpoint pathway to help the immune system overcome the


immune escape achieved by checkpoint overexpression and reactivate immune predation by neoantigenic cancer cells. Therefore, we performed an analysis of immune checkpoints to explore the


relationship of their associated genes and, in addition, assessed the proportion of immune substrate components in the tumor microenvironment (TME) using the ESTIMATEScore15. Tumor


mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) play important roles in the tumor microenvironment16, 17, so we evaluated the relationship between _IGFL2_ on TMB and MSI. DNA


METHYLATION AND GENE MUTATION CORRELATION ANALYSIS The UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/analysis.html) database18 was used to analyze _IGFL2_ methylation levels in different tumors and


normal tissues, with Student's t-test for difference assessment; The online cBioPortal database (http://www.cbioportal.org/) for cancer genomics was used to obtain gene mutation


profiles and prognosis19. GSEA ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS _IGFL2_ expression was divided into high and low expression groups and analyzed for significant biological pathways by Gene set enrichment


analysis (GSEA) enrichment analysis using the gene set KEGG and the immune-related HALLMARK gene set20,21,22, where gene sets with |NES|> 1, NOM _p_ < 0.05 and FDR q < 0.25 were


considered to be significantly enriched. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Analyses were all based on R (3.6.3) using R packages including tidyverse, survival, ggplot2, fmsb, limma, estimate, etc. _p_ 


< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS EXPRESSION OF _IGFL2_ IN CANCER According to the TIMER2.0 database results, the difference in _IGFL2_ expression between cancer


and normal tissues was significant in most cancers, including BLCA, BRCA, CHOL, COAD, ESCA, GBM, HNSC, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, LUAD, LUSC, SKCM, HNSC, STAD THCA, and UCEC, while _IGFL2_ expression


was higher in normal tissues than in cancerous tissues in GBM. Since some cancers lacked normal tissue controls, we obtained basic information from the TCGA database and supplemented the


normal tissue controls from the GTEx database, which showed (Fig. 1) that, in addition to the above cancers, the expression of ACC, CESC, DLBC, LAML, LGG, OV, PAAD, READ, TGCT, THYM and UCS


differed significantly, suggesting that _IGFL2_ may be a participant in oncogenic events. In contrast, _IGFL2_ expression was higher in normal than tumor tissues of SKCM, TGCT, UCEC, and


UCS. THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF _IGFL2_ IN CANCER We comprehensively analyzed the prognosis-related information in pan-cancer based on TCGA clinically relevant information, where survival


indicators included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS). the results of COX regression analysis showed (Fig. 2A) that _IGFL2_ was associated with a variety of tumors,


including KIRP, KIRC, BLCA, MESO, PAAD and other cancers. And the K-M survival curves showed (Fig. 2A) that the HR and confidence intervals of KIRC,BLCA,KIRP,MESO,PAAD were 1.55 (1.14–2.10),


1.51 (1.11–2.05), 2.70 (1.18–6.17), 1.69 (1.05–2.73), 1.54 (1.02–2.34), respectively, representing that high expression of _IGFL2_ was associated with poor prognosis. After changing the


survival index to DFS (Fig. 2B), the statistically significant cancers were PAAD, KIRP, and in the K-M survival curve analysis (Fig. 2B), the elevated expression of _IGFL2_ in PAAD 3.31


(1.33–8.22) and KIRP 2.32 (1.02–5.27) affected the prognosis. We further analyzed the relationship between _IGFL2_ expression and different clinical stages of cancer (stage0-IV) using the


GEPIA database, and the results are shown in the figure (Fig. 2C). It can be found that there is a trend of elevated _IGFL2_ expression in BLCA, KIRC, KIRP, LICH, and SKCM. Then we analyzed


the samples of KIRC, KIRP, and KICH simultaneously to obtain the results of mixed renal carcinoma, which showed that _IGFL2_ expression was significantly higher in the advanced stage of


cancer than in the early clinical stage, and was a risk factor affecting prognosis. IMMUNOCORRELATION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS OF _IGFL2_ EXPRESSION AND IMMUNE CELL INFILTRATION Based on the


TIMER2.0 database, the relationship between B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells and _IGFL2_ expression was analyzed, and the results are shown


in the figure (Fig. 3A). It can be found that _IGFL2_ was correlated with most immune cells, B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and Myeloid dendritic cell were


correlated with 9, 7, 13, 12, 15, and 24 cancers, respectively. We further calculated the correlation between _IGFL2_ and immune cell subsets using the CIBERSORT algorithm (Fig. 3B),


including B cells naive, B cells memory, Plasma cells,T cells CD8,T cells CD4 naive,T cells CD4 memory resting, T cells CD4 memory activated,T cells follicular helper,T cells regulatory


(Tregs),T cells gamma delta,NK cells resting,NK cells activated,Monocytes,Macrophages M0,Macrophages M1,Macrophages M2,Dendritic cells resting,Dendritic cells activated,Mast cells


resting,Mast cells activated,Eosinophils,Neutrophils. _IGFL2_ expression correlated with most immune cells in LUAD, BRCA, HNSC, LIHC, THCA, OV, and BLCA, with mostly negative correlations in


HNSC. Among immune cell subgroups, monocytes demonstrated negative correlation with _IGFL2_, including LAML, BRCA, ESCA, SARC, KIRP, PRAD, HNSC, KIRC, LUSC, LIHC, THCA, OV, and BLCA.


ANALYSIS OF IMMUNE-RELATED GENES The importance of immunosurveillance in determining the prognosis of various types of cancer has been widely accepted. Tumors can evade immune responses by


exploiting immune checkpoint genes. To further investigate the association between _IGFL2_ and the degree of immune infiltration in different cancers, we investigated the correlation between


_IGFL2_ and immune checkpoint gene expression (Fig. 4). _IGFL2_ expression was positively correlated with immune checkpoint genes in almost all cancers, with positive correlations with most


immune checkpoints demonstrated in BLCA, BRCA, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, LUAD, OV, THCA UCEC, UCS and UVM. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that in HNSC, _IGFL2_ expression showed a broad negative


correlation with immune checkpoint genes. Notably, CD70 correlated relatively strongly with _IGFL2_ in ACC, while TNFSF14,IDO2 showed a relatively significant positive correlation with


ICOSLG in UCS. Immune checkpoint BTLA appeared positively correlated with CD160 in UVM. IMMUNOSUBSTRATE COMPOSITION, TMB AND MSI ANALYSIS The ESTIMATE score allows the calculation of stromal


and immune cell ratios in tumor samples to infer tumor purity15. We assessed the proportion of immune matrix components using three scores, StromalScore, ImmuneScore and ESTIMATEScore,


showed that 24 cancers were positively correlated with _IGFL2_ expression, including CHAD (r = 0.39, 0.35, 0.40), LUSC (r = 0.46, 0.21, 0.34), and THCA (r = 0.51, 0.44, 0.50), _p_ < 0.001


(Fig. 5A), indicating that _IGFL2_ expression was closely associated with the degree of immune infiltration in cancer. In the coming study, we found that tumor mutational load and


microsatellite instability have an important influence in the tumor microenvironment, and the assessment of TMB and MSI in tumors has some significance for the analysis of subsequent tumor


studies. To explore the influence of _IGFL2_ on the tumor microenvironment, we analyzed the correlation between TMB and MSI in pan-cancer (Fig. 5B). In the TMB analysis, there were positive


correlations for COAD, THYM, and UCEC, and negative correlations for DLBC, HNSC, LUAD, LUSC, SARC, and UVM. In the MSI analysis, there were positive correlations with COAD and UCEC and


negative correlations with KIRC and LUSC. PAN-CANCER ANALYSIS OF _IGFL2_ METHYLATION LEVELS AND GENETIC ALTERATIONS Both hypo- and hypermethylation of DNA contribute to the development of


tumors. We investigated the DNA methylation of _IGFL2_ using the UALCAN and TCGA databases (Fig. 6A). According to the UALCAN database, significantly lower levels of _IGFL2_ methylation were


observed in BLCA, COAD, HNSC, KIRC, LIHC, LUAD, PAAD, READ, TGCT, THCA and UCEC tissues compared to normal tissues. And methylation levels were increased in KIRP. Meanwhile, we analyzed the


_IGFL2_ mutation levels using cBioPortal (TCGA, Pan-Cancer Atlas) (Fig. 6B) and found that the highest mutation levels were found in UCS, over 6%, all of which were gene amplifications. The


prognostic impact of mutations was further demonstrated with K-M curves, using OS, DFS, disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as survival indicators, and


dividing the cases into mutation and normal groups, and found that the prognosis of the mutation group was significantly worse in all survival indicators, with statistically significant


results (_p_ < 0.05). It is suggested that the mutation of _IGFL2_ may have influenced the survival rate of cancer. AGGREGATION ANALYSIS To investigate the potential mechanism of _IGFL2_


involvement in carcinogenesis, GSEA was performed to identify the functional enrichment of _IGFL2_ high and low expression, and the gene sets KEGG and HALLMARK were used. the KEGG and


HALLMARK enrichment items indicated that the high expression of _IGFL2_ was mainly related to signaling and metabolism-related activities, including JAK/STAT signaling pathway, inflammatory


response, olfactory conduction, etc. (Fig. 7). The results are shown in more detail in the supplementary files (Supplementary Files). DISCUSSION In this study, we comprehensively analyzed


the effects of _IGFL2_ expression, prognosis, immunity, methylation, mutation and pathways in pan-cancer. In terms of gene expression, _IGFL2_ may be widely elevated as an oncogenic molecule


in a variety of cancers, while in prognosis-related analysis, high _IGFL2_ expression likewise resulted in shorter survival in patients with KIRC,BLCA,KIRP,MESO,PAAD.Notably, in terms of


prognosis, _IGFL2_ was particularly prominent in urologic tumors (KIRC,KIRP,BLCA), and one study found that insulin-like growth factor-II (_IGF2_) mRNA-binding protein _IMP3_ expression was


closely associated with clinical grade and prognosis of renal clear cell carcinoma23. _IGFL2_, as a homolog of insulin-like growth factor, may be a marker affecting KIRC prognosis. After


establishing that _IGFL2_ expression is broadly associated with pan-cancer prognosis, we analyzed whether it influences tumor progression in the tumor microenvironment. Tumor cells, stromal


cells, and inflammatory cells in TME suppress lymphocyte and effector cell infiltration, leading to tumor growth24 and profoundly affecting tumor prognosis25. Tumor progression is


accompanied by tumor escape from the immune system26, and tumor cells can adopt different strategies to survive and grow, thus limiting the immune system, therefore we comprehensively


analyzed the major tumor infiltrating immune cell (TIIC) landscape. This study found that _IGFL2_ expression was positively correlated with most immune cells in most cancers. In TIIC


analysis, monocytes appeared negatively correlated with IGFL2 in LAML, BRCA, ESCA, SARC, KIRP, PRAD, HNSC, KIRC, LUSC, LIHC, THCA, OV, and BLCA. Monocytes have been found to link innate and


adaptive immune responses and can influence TME through various mechanisms, inducing immune tolerance, angiogenesis and increasing tumor cell dissemination27. Further collection of more than


40 immune-related genes and analysis of the correlation between _IGFL2_ expression and the expression of these genes showed that _IGFL2_ was associated with a variety of immune-related


genes and showed a positive correlation. The above suggests whether _IGFL2_ could be an emerging target for immunotherapy. Interestingly, in immune cell infiltration analysis and immune


checkpoint analysis, _IGFL2_ showed a negative relationship with most immune cells and immune-related genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, where genes such as PD-L1, PD-L and


interferon-γ were reported to have the potential to predict the therapeutic benefit of checkpoint inhibitors28, this suggests that _IGFL2_ may act on genetic checkpoints to affect cancer.


The causes affecting tumor immunity are multifaceted and include factors internal to the tumor and complex interactions between cancer cells and various components of TME. The complexity of


TME is also reflected by the stimulatory factors, inhibitory factors, and positive correlations among immune checkpoints in the same group of patients.TMB has now been shown to be a useful


biomarker for selective immune checkpoint blockade in a wide range of cancers16, and MSI has been confirmed by many authors as a prognostic indicator and a predictor of treatment efficacy29,


30, and the results show that _IGFL2_ in COAD, THYM, UCEC, DLBC, HNSC, LUAD, LUSC, SARC, UVM may serve as biomarkers for tumor immunotherapy. Methylation is one of the molecular


modifications, methylation of DNA and RNA can regulate the expression of genes involved in the differentiation and function of pro- and anti-cancer immune cells, thus affecting the


development of cancer31, while abnormal DNA methylation can lead to the development of cancer, hypermethylation in the promoter region can suppress the expression of oncogenes, and reduced


DNA methylation occurs in the early stages of tumors, activating proto-oncogenes and leading to the development of cancer32. In the analysis of DNA methylation, we found that _IGFL2_ was


reduced in methylation in a variety of cancers. The possible reason for the appearance of elevated methylation in KIRP is the silencing or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer


cells.Gene mutations are also known to be one of the main causes affecting cancer progression, and our study found that the expected survival in the _IGFL2_ mutant group was significantly


lower than that in the normal group, again consistent with previous studies. To explore the biological role of genes in tumorigenesis, we performed GSEA analysis. The long-stranded noncoding


RNA of _IGFL2_ regulates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by increasing _SATB1_ expression to promote cancer development33, and in the results of GSEA enrichment analysis, we identified


a significant enrichment of _IGFL2_ in the Wnt signaling pathway in thyroid cancer. In contrast, Toll-like receptor signaling, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), and JAK/STAT signaling pathways


all appeared more frequently in GSEA enrichment results, suggesting that _IGFL2_ may be involved in related pathways affecting cancer progression.Toll-like receptor signaling is involved in


innate and adaptive immune processes and plays an important role in tumorigenesis and progression34, 35. CAMs can play a structural role in cell or extracellular matrix adhesion and


activate related pathways to enhance cell survival, while the tumor environment leads to proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells due to disruption of CAMs36. Aberrant activation of the


JAK/STAT signaling pathway has also been demonstrated in a variety of tumors37, 38. And in the study of bladder cancer and JAK/STAT signaling pathway, IGF family-related genes were found to


activate JAK/STAT signaling pathway to proliferate tumors39. In the immune-related HALLMARK set, the pathways of inflammatory response, epithelial mesenchymal transition, and interferon


alpha response were enriched. A recent study on IGFL2 found that miR-802 is a tumor growth suppressor and the long-stranded non-coding RNA of _IGFL2_ (_IGFL2-AS1_) can promote the


progression of gastric cancer by inhibiting the expression of miR-80240, 41, while in breast cancer studies, _IGFL2-AS1_ acts as a factor mediating the _KLF5/IGFL1_ axis and inhibits


miR4795-3p expression thereby affecting breast cancer proliferation42. Cen et al. found a significant decrease in proliferation of COAD cells after knocking down _IGFL2-AS1_43. In some


database-based studies, _IGFL2_ was found as a potential pathogenic gene or gene affecting prognosis in liver, breast, renal clear cell, and bladder cancers44,45,46,47, which is consistent


with the results of our analysis. However, although the present study did a multifaceted pan-cancer analysis of _IGFL2_, it still has some limitations; First, the study was based on data


analysis performed in a database, so its causal argument is less powerful than direct experimental studies, and further mechanistic studies would be beneficial to elucidate the role at the


molecular and cellular levels of _IGFL2_; Second, there are fewer studies on _IGFL2_ and lack of corresponding results to support it. CONCLUSION Upregulation of _IGFL2_ expression was


associated with poor patient prognosis and correlated with the level of immune cell infiltration in several cancers. Also, IGFL2 was significantly associated with the expression of immune


checkpoint markers, and reduced methylation of IGFL2 was observed in many types of cancers.In conclusion, this study is the first to analyze the multifaceted relationship between _IGFL2_ and


pan-cancer, and the results of the analysis suggest that _IGFL2_ may be a new research direction for tumor therapy. DATA AVAILABILITY Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this


study. This data can be found here: The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). ABBREVIATIONS * ACC: Adrenocortical carcinoma * BLCA: Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma * BRCA:


Breast invasive carcinoma * CESC: Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma * CHOL: Cholangiocarcinoma * COAD: Colon adenocarcinoma * DLBC: Lymphoid Neoplasm Diffuse


Large B-cell Lymphoma * ESCA: Esophageal carcinoma * GBM: Glioblastoma multiforme * HNSC: Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma * KICH: Kidney Chromophobe * KIRC: Kidney renal clear cell


carcinoma * KIRP: Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma * LAML: Acute Myeloid Leukemia * LGG: Brain Lower Grade Glioma * LIHC: Liver hepatocellular carcinoma * LUAD: Lung adenocarcinoma *


LUSC: Lung squamous cell carcinoma * MESO: Mesothelioma * OV: Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma * PAAD: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma * PCPG: Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma * PRAD: Prostate


adenocarcinoma * READ: Rectum adenocarcinoma * SARC: Sarcoma * STAD: Stomach adenocarcinoma * SKCM: Skin Cutaneous Melanoma * TGCT: Testicular Germ Cell Tumors * THCA: Thyroid carcinoma *


THYM: Thymoma * UCEC: Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma * UCS: Uterine Carcinosarcoma * UVM: Uveal Melanoma * TME: The tumor microenvironment * TMB: Tumor mutational burden * MSI:


Microsatellite instability * GSEA: Gene set enrichment analysis * HR: Hazard ratio * CI: Confidence interval * OS: Overall survival * DFS: Disease-free survival * DSS: Disease special


survival * PFS: Progression-free survival * TIIC: Tumor infiltrating immune cell * CAMs: Cell adhesion molecules REFERENCES * Sung, H. _et al._ Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN


estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. _CA Cancer J. Clin._ 71(3), 209–249 (2021). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhang, Y. & Zhang, Z. The


history and advances in cancer immunotherapy: understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications. _Cell Mol. Immunol._ 17(8), 807–821


(2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Emtage, P. _et al._ IGFL: A secreted family with conserved cysteine residues and similarities to the IGF superfamily.


_Genomics_ 88(4), 513–520 (2006). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yu, H. & Rohan, T. Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression. _J.


Natl. Cancer Inst._ 92(18), 1472–1489 (2000). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Weroha SJ, Haluska P. The insulin-like growth factor system in cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am.


2012;41(2):335–50, vi. * Sundar, R. _et al._ Spatial profiling of gastric cancer patient-matched primary and locoregional metastases reveals principles of tumour dissemination. _Gut_ 70(10),


1823–1832 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gao, T., Liu, X., He, B., Pan, Y. & Wang, S. IGF2 loss of imprinting enhances colorectal cancer stem cells pluripotency by


promoting tumor autophagy. _Aging (Albany NY)_ 12(21), 21236–21252 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Nur, S. I. _et al._ IGFBP-4: A promising biomarker for lung cancer. _J.


Med. Biochem._ 40(3), 237–244 (2021). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. _et al._ The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. _Nat.


Genet._ 45(10), 1113–1120 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Colaprico, A. _et al._ TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 44(8),


e71 (2016). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Consortium GT. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. _Nat Genet._ 45(6), 580–585 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Li, T. _et al._


TIMER: A web server for comprehensive analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. _Cancer Res._ 77(21), e108–e110 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Tang, Z.


_et al._ GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 45(W1), W98–W102 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 


Google Scholar  * Chen, B., Khodadoust, M. S., Liu, C. L., Newman, A. M. & Alizadeh, A. A. Profiling tumor infiltrating immune cells with CIBERSORT. _Methods Mol. Biol._ 1711, 243–259


(2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Yoshihara, K. _et al._ Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. _Nat. Commun._ 4,


2612 (2013). Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chan, T. A. _et al._ Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: Utility for the oncology clinic. _Ann. Oncol._


30(1), 44–56 (2019). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Andre, T. _et al._ Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability-high advanced colorectal cancer. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 383(23),


2207–2218 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chandrashekar, D. S. _et al._ UALCAN: An update to the integrated cancer data analysis platform. _Neoplasia_ 25, 18–27 (2022).


Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gao, J. _et al._ Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. _Sci Signal._ 6(269), pl1


(2013). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Subramanian, A. _et al._ Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression


profiles. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA_ 102(43), 15545–15550 (2005). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M. &


Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 44, D457–D462 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG:


Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 28, 27–30 (2000). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hoffmann, N. E. _et al._ External validation of IMP3


expression as an independent prognostic marker for metastatic progression and death for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. _Cancer_ 112(7), 1471–1479 (2008). Article  PubMed 


Google Scholar  * Pitt, J. M. _et al._ Targeting the tumor microenvironment: Removing obstruction to anticancer immune responses and immunotherapy. _Ann. Oncol._ 27(8), 1482–1492 (2016).


Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chen, Z. _et al._ Single-cell RNA sequencing highlights the role of inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts in bladder urothelial carcinoma. _Nat.


Commun._ 11(1), 5077 (2020). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Dunn, G. P., Old, L. J. & Schreiber, R. D. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and


immunoediting. _Immunity_ 21(2), 137–148 (2004). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ugel, S., Cane, S., De Sanctis, F. & Bronte, V. Monocytes in the tumor microenvironment. _Annu.


Rev. Pathol._ 16, 93–122 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Solomon, B., Young, R. J. & Rischin, D. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Genomics and emerging biomarkers


for immunomodulatory cancer treatments. _Semin. Cancer Biol._ 52(Pt 2), 228–240 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Vilar, E. & Gruber, S. B. Microsatellite instability in


colorectal cancer-the stable evidence. _Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol._ 7(3), 153–162 (2010). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Chang, L., Chang, M., Chang, H. M. & Chang,


F. Microsatellite Instability: A Predictive Biomarker for Cancer Immunotherapy. _Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol._ 26(2), e15–e21 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mehdi,


A. & Rabbani, S. A. Role of methylation in pro- and anti-cancer immunity. _Cancers (Basel)_ 13(3), 545 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lakshminarasimhan, R. & Liang,


G. The role of DNA methylation in cancer. _Adv. Exp. Med. Biol._ 945, 151–172 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhao, R., Wang, S., Tan, L., Li, H., Liu, J.


& Zhang S. IGFL2-AS1 facilitates tongue squamous cell carcinoma progression via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. _Oral Dis_. (2021). * Moradi-Marjaneh, R. _et al._ Toll like receptor


signaling pathway as a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. _J. Cell Physiol._ 233(8), 5613–5622 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Li, T. T., Ogino, S. &


Qian, Z. R. Toll-like receptor signaling in colorectal cancer: carcinogenesis to cancer therapy. _World J. Gastroenterol._ 20(47), 17699–17708 (2014). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google


Scholar  * D’Arcy, C. & Kiel, C. Cell adhesion molecules in normal skin and melanoma. _Biomolecules_ 11(8), 213 (2021). Google Scholar  * Gutierrez-Hoya, A. & Soto-Cruz, I. Role of


the JAK/STAT pathway in cervical cancer: Its relationship with HPV E6/E7 oncoproteins. _Cells_ 9(10), 2297 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Yang, X., Tang, Z.,


Zhang, P. & Zhang, L. Research advances of JAK/STAT signaling pathway in lung cancer]. _Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi_ 22(1), 45–51 (2019). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Huang, W. _et al._ IGF2BP3


facilitates cell proliferation and tumorigenesis via modulation of JAK/STAT signalling pathway in human bladder cancer. _J. Cell Mol. Med._ 24(23), 13949–13960 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed


  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gao, T., Zou, M., Shen, T. & Duan, S. Dysfunction of miR-802 in tumors. _J. Clin. Lab. Anal._ 35(11), e23989 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Ma, Y. _et al._ LncRNA IGFL2-AS1 functions as a ceRNA in regulating ARPP19 through competitive binding to miR-802 in gastric cancer. _Mol. Carcinog._ 59(3),


311–322 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, H. _et al._ KLF5-induced lncRNA IGFL2-AS1 promotes basal-like breast cancer cell growth and survival by upregulating the


expression of IGFL1. _Cancer Lett._ 515, 49–62 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Cen, X. _et al._ LncRNA IGFL2-AS1 promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of colon


cancer cells and is associated with patient prognosis. _Cancer Manag. Res._ 13, 5957–5968 (2021). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zou, B. _et al._ A novel 12-marker panel


of cancer-associated fibroblasts involved in progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. _Cancer Manag. Res._ 10, 5303–5311 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ren,


C., Tang, X. & Lan, H. Comprehensive analysis based on DNA methylation and RNA-seq reveals hypermethylation of the up-regulated WT1 gene with potential mechanisms in PAM50 subtypes of


breast cancer. _PeerJ_ 9, e11377 (2021). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wang, G. _et al._ Novel prognosis and therapeutic response model of immune-related lncRNA pairs in


clear cell renal cell carcinoma. _Vaccines (Basel)_ 10(7), 1161 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chi, M. _et al._ TEAD4 functions as a prognostic biomarker and triggers EMT


via PI3K/AKT pathway in bladder cancer. _J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res._ 41(1), 175 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the


Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Health Science and Technology Program for their support. FUNDING The sources of funding are as follows: Health Science and Technology Plan Project of Inner


Mongolia Autonomous Region (No. 202201228). AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * School of Public Health, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China Yuqi Wang, Lingyan Zhao, 


Yuan Xia, Nan Zhang, Hailing Li, Dongyang Liu, Yubo Su & Yumin Gao * Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China Hongwei Yuan *


Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China Genquan Yue * Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases, Inner Mongolia


Medical University, Hohhot, China Lingyan Zhao, Yuan Xia, Nan Zhang, Hailing Li & Yumin Gao * Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia


Medical University, Hohhot, China Haisheng Wang Authors * Yuqi Wang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hongwei Yuan View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Genquan Yue View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Lingyan Zhao


View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yuan Xia View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Nan


Zhang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hailing Li View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *


Dongyang Liu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yubo Su View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google


Scholar * Haisheng Wang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yumin Gao View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed


 Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS Y.Q.W., Y.M.G. and H.W.Y. conceived and designed the study. Y.Q.W., D.Y.L. and Y.B.S. performed the analysis. L.Y.Z., H.L.L., Y.X. and N.Z. elaborated all the


figures. Y.Q.W. and YMG wrote the main manuscript. Y.M.G., H.S.W. and G.Q.Y. revised the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence


to Haisheng Wang or Yumin Gao. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains


neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This


article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as


you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party


material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the


article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the


copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Wang, Y., Yuan, H., Yue, G.


_et al._ Pan-cancer analysis reveals IGFL2 as a potential target for cancer prognosis and immunotherapy. _Sci Rep_ 13, 6034 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27602-7 Download


citation * Received: 04 October 2022 * Accepted: 04 January 2023 * Published: 13 April 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27602-7 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the


following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer


Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative