Caffeine intake modulates the functioning of the attentional networks depending on consumption habits and acute exercise demands

ABSTRACT Consume of stimulants (as caffeine) is very usual in different contexts where the performers have to take quick and accurate decisions during physical effort. Decision-making

processes are mediated by the attentional networks. An experiment was carried out to examine the effect of caffeine intake on attention (alerting, orienting, and executive control) as a

function of consumption habit under two physical exertion conditions (rest vs. aerobic exercise). Two groups of participants with different caffeine consumption profiles (moderate consumers

vs. low consumers) performed the Attention Network Test–Interactions under four different conditions regarding activity (rest vs. exercise) and intake (caffeine vs. placebo). Results showed

that whereas exercise led to faster reaction times (RT) in all cases, caffeine intake accelerated RT but only at rest and in moderate caffeine consumers. More importantly, caffeine intake

reduced the alertness effect in moderate consumers only at the rest condition. No interactions between Intake and Activity were observed in the other attentional networks, with exercise

reducing orienting independently of caffeine intake, which suggests that physical exercise and caffeine are different modulators of attention but can interact. Caffeine intake had

differential effects on reaction speed at rest and during physical exercise depending on the individual consumption habit. On the basis of these finding it seems that mainly alertness is

modulated differently by internal and external “arousing” conditions. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS BENEFITS OF A LIGHT- INTENSITY BOUT OF EXERCISE ON ATTENTIONAL NETWORKS

FUNCTIONING Article Open access 28 October 2024 NEURAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL FATIGUE ON EFFORT-BASED CHOICE Article Open access 12 August 2020 ACUTE AEROBIC EXERCISE

BENEFITS ALLOCATION OF NEURAL RESOURCES RELATED TO SELECTIVE ATTENTION Article Open access 27 May 2023 INTRODUCTION At different environmental situations (as practicing sports, driving

vehicles, surgery interventions…) people must often perform physical activities and respond quickly to external challenges. Decision-making processes are mediated by the three attentional

networks (alerting, orienting, and executive control) defined by Petersen & Posner1. The executive control network is involved in situations that require planning, decision making, error

detection, execution of novel responses, or overcoming habitual actions2. The orienting network is responsible for allocating attention to a particular object or region of space in a

voluntary-endogenous or reflexive-exogenous way, enhancing its processing while ignoring irrelevant objects/locations3. Finally, the alerting network participates in the general activation

of cortical and thalamic areas, thus preparing the perceptual-motor system for fast reactions through changes in the norepinephrine system. During different situations of daily living like

working and sport tasks, these attentional networks have to work in cooperation to maintain an efficient psychomotor performance during the physical-cognitive dual task challenges inherent

to those activities. The relationship between exercise and two of the main core components of executive control (inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility) has been widely studied by

researchers. Inhibitory control refers to the ability to attend to a relevant stimulus while ignoring the others that are not relevant to the goal or task at hand. Cognitive flexibility

refers to the ability to rapidly switch between different tasks. Previous research reported that the above- mentioned component of executive control were improved (enhancing inhibitory

processes4 and reducing switch cost5) when participants were exercising under an aerobic workload. Yet, and according to the hypofrontality hypothesis6, neuroelectric7 and behavioral8

findings showed impaired conflict resolution during exercise conditions as compared to rest conditions. In addition, other studies failed to show any differential effects of acute aerobic

exercise on participants’ performance9, thus adding more contradictory findings regarding the nature and direction of this relationship. More importantly for the purposes of the present

study, scarce studies have analyzed the effect of concomitant physical effort on the three attentional networks assessed at the same time. Faster RT during the exercise condition were

reported by Chang and colleagues10 using the Attentional Network test (ANT)11, but only on trials with incongruent flankers, thus leading to reduced interference10. Another study, closer to

the present one, using a version of the ANT named Attentional Network Test Interaction (ANT-I)12 showed no effect of exercise on executive control13. Regarding spatial attentional orienting,

in a series of studies Pesce and colleagues found that aerobic exercise enhanced the flexibility in modulating the spatial extent of visual attentional focus at different ages and sport

modalities14,15,16,17,18. Regarding the shifting of spatial attention in the visual space, the ability we will analyze in our study, previous findings have shown that the effect of exercise

on cueing effects in visuospatial attention is modulated by gender19 and sport expertise20. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have explored the effects of acute bouts of

aerobic exercise on the deployment of exogenous visual spatial attention. Previous studies found that an acute bout of aerobic exercise performed during or even immediately before a spatial

orienting task eliminated the typical spatial cueing effect21. Later studies established that spatial orienting in overt attentional capture was influenced by high intensity exercise, and

depended on participants’ fitness level showing more reduced attentional effects in low-fit participants than in high-fit participants22. However, contradictory results were found when

attentional networks were assessed simultaneously, with no effects of exercise on exogenous spatial orienting10,13. On the other hand, the modulation of alertness by acute exercise has been

widely studied but also shows mixed results. There are two types of alertness. Phasic extrinsic alertness is associated with an abrupt increase of nonspecific activation when a warning cue

is presented preceding the target (this is related to the orienting response23). By contrast, tonic alertness or vigilance refers to sustained activation over a period of time24. Regarding

phasic alertness, previous studies reported that participants’ accuracy was lower when the task was performed under an intense physical exertion condition than at rest25. However,

contradictory results emerge again when attentional networks are assessed simultaneously using the ANT task. Neuroelectric findings have showed larger P3 amplitude (a positive-going

component associated to the amount of attentional resources allocated to environmental events), on alerting trials in the exercise condition10. However, another behavioral study has found a

reduction of the size of the phasic alerting effect during aerobic exercise as compared to the rest condition13. Regarding the tonic alertness (sustained attention), there is a broad

consensus that moderate to intense exercising enhance the state of tonic vigilance26, though poorer vigilance performance was observed under heavier exercising conditions27. Previous

research has shown that the effect of acute bout of exercise on attentional networks seems to be moderated by different individual and contextual constraints (e.g., participant physical

fitness, sport modality, exercise intensity, or others as consume of ergogenic or stimulant substances). Therefore these variables need to be considered in the study of the acute

exercise-attention relationship. During challenging environmental conditions, people often decide to consume stimulants to improve performance. Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) has become

one of the most popularly used ergogenic substances to improve both physical and cognitive performance28,29. However, though improvement in general attentional performance induced by

caffeine intake is well accepted, there is scarce and controversial evidence about its effect on each attentional network and their interactions. Regarding the effect of caffeine intake on

executive control, caffeine has been shown to have a positive influence on the ability to switch attention between tasks (task switching) and anticipatory control processes30,31. However

caffeine consumption has failed to modulate other facets of inhibitory function like the ability to control interference from distracting stimuli (using Ericksen Flanker Test) and the

ability to suppress responses selectively (e.g., by using a Stroop task)32. Previous studies exploring the interactions between exercise and caffeine on executive control reported a positive

effect of caffeine intake after exercise33, during aerobic34 and intermittent exercises35. Few studies have been nevertheless conducted on the effect of caffeine on attentional

orienting36,37. Such studies, performed under resting conditions, have only shown marginal effects of caffeine intake on orienting when low caffeine consumers were tested. However,

controversial findings have been reported when interaction between caffeine intake and orienting was studied manipulating exercise conditions. While some studies did not find modulations of

caffeine on object tracking or covert spatial orienting respectively after aerobic acute exercise38,39, others showed positive effects on shifting attention after longer medium to high

intensity aerobic exercises33. Considering alertness, systematic reviews have reported significant enhancements of various doses of caffeine on vigilance40,41. Concerning the interaction

between caffeine and exercise on alertness, sustained vigilance appears to be improved by caffeine intake after33 and during34 an acute exercise bout. However, caffeine specific effects on

phasic alertness during exercise hasn’t been studied yet. Scarce studies have investigated the effects of caffeine on the functioning of the three attentional networks concurrently. To our

knowledge, Brunyé and colleagues are the only ones who have investigated the effects of caffeine intake on the three attentional networks simultaneously by means of the ANT task36,37. They

have reported that caffeine-induced physiological arousal amplifies global spatial processing, vigilance and executive control, but these effects are at least partially driven by the

administered dose and habitual caffeine consumption. These findings are in line with those showing that caffeine increases arousal on every type (low and habitual) of caffeine consumers42.

However, most studies in this topic have involved caffeine–deprived habitual caffeine consumers, which makes it difficult to know whether the observed findings are due to the effects of

caffeine intake or the alleviation of caffeine withdrawal. On this vein, another study investigated acute effects of caffeine in both habitual and non-habitual caffeine consumers observing a

more positive effect of caffeine intake on consumers’ mood state while improving cognitive performance more in the non-consumers43. Thus, previous findings suggest that the effects of

caffeine intake on attentional performance could be explained, not only by a withdrawal reduction model, but also by other mechanisms involving the brain biochemistry and the effect of

caffeine on dopamine-rich areas of the brain. Considering that in many daily life activities caffeine intake is combined with a physical effort, we have to take into account the evidence

from previous literature reviewing the effects of acute exercise on cognition from a neurochemical perspective. A recent review by McMorris44 has shown that long duration, moderate

intensity, and heavy exercise generate excessive concentrations of catecholamines and cortisol inhibiting working memory. Nevertheless, heavy exercise has a positive effect on long-term

memory due to activation of β-adrenoreceptors and increased exercise-induced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels. Since it is widely known that attentional functioning is also

modulated by the exercise- induced physiological response facilitating or inhibiting attentional performance, it would be worth to study the joint effects of physical exercise and caffeine

as both take part in similar mechanism underlying the brain biochemistry. However, and importantly for our research, the exercise- and caffeine-induced changes on the attentional networks

are somewhat equivocal44, as described above, and therefore future research is necessary. Furthermore, understanding the interplay between exercise, caffeine intake and consumption habits on

the functioning of the three attentional networks is crucial for adapting caffeine consumption to optimize its expected benefits. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no study so far

has examined this interaction. In order to fill this gap, the goal of the present study was to explore the individual and interactive effects of caffeine intake and acute physical exercise

on the functioning of the attentional networks in the context of a multi-functional task (ANT-I task12) under four different conditions resulting from the combination of activity (i.e., rest

vs. sustained moderate aerobic exercise) and intake (caffeine vs. placebo). Following the above reviewed literature, behavioral and neurophysiological findings lead to argue that the

efficiency of the central nervous and cognitive function (reaction time and attention) is modulated by exercise-induced44 and caffeine-induced37 neurobiochemical mechanisms regulating

arousal. It is relevant to highlight that caffeine consumption41 and exercise45 modulate the baseline arousal level (lower under rest and placebo conditions), mainly in participants more

habituated to caffeine intake. Based on this evidence we expected to observe an interaction between caffeine intake, consumption habit and exercise condition on cognitive performance. This

interaction was expected for overall RT and alertness, as these variables seems to be affected by opposite manipulations reducing arousal46,47,48. In our case, we expected faster RT (tonic

alertness) and reduced phasic alertness effects in the conditions in which the combination of exercise and caffeine intake would lead to stronger activation. We also wanted to explore

whether caffeine intake and exercise also affect the functioning of the other attentional networks (orienting and executive control). Although some effects have been previously reported in

the above reviewed literature, no clear predictions were anticipated. METHOD PARTICIPANTS Twenty-four male undergraduate sport sciences students (age range: 21–25 years; _M_ = 22 years) were

selected to participate in this study. We used the usual sample size with the ANTI task12,49, without using a priori power analyses. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using

G*power50 which showed that with our sample size (N = 24) and 48 repeated measures, the minimum effect size that could have been detected for α = 0.5, and 1 − β = 0.80, for 2 groups, is f = 

0.11 (minimum detectable effect). Participants were assigned to one of two groups according to their habitual caffeine consumption based on their responses to a self-report food survey.

Following previous recommendations51 we used a between-group design, allocating participants to one of two groups depending on their caffeine consumption habit and dispensing an individual

caffeine dosage depending on participants’ body weight. According to participants’ estimated daily caffeine intake52, they were assigned to either the low or moderate caffeine consumers

group using a cut-off point criterion (Low consumers ≤ 50 mg/day vs. Moderate consumers > 50 mg/day)43. Half of participants were categorized as low caffeine consumers (_M_ = 14 mg/day,

range = 0–28 mg/day) and half were considered moderate caffeine consumers (_M_ = 101 mg/day, range = 57–228 mg/day). All participants were non-smokers who were in good health and were not

taking any medication. They all completed both an ethical clearance form and a statement regarding informed consent. PROCEDURE Present research followed accepted ethical, scientific and

medical standards and was conducted in compliance with recognized international standards, in accordance with the revised version (2013) of the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent was

obtained from all study participants. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Catholic University of Valencia, Spain (UCV/2016-2017/02). Participants visited the

laboratory on five separate days with a minimum interval of 48 hours and a maximum interval of 96 hours, approximately at the same time of the day. They were instructed to abstain from

consuming caffeine or any stimulant substance and to avoid physical exercise for 24 h prior to each session. On the first visit, participants performed a graded submaximal test in order to

determine their Lactate Threshold (LT). The next four visits were experimental sessions in which participants had to complete the attentional tasks corresponding to the Intake (caffeine vs.

placebo) and Activity (rest vs. exercise) conditions, whose order was counterbalanced across participants using a Latin square design. The experimental timeline is depicted in Fig. 1. At the

end of the last experimental session, participants were debriefed on the purposes of the study and received a description of their physical and cardiovascular fitness and attentional

performance. During cycling parameter estimation test and attentional evaluation we have employed the same attentional tasks, and similar resources and procedures previously described by the

authors in a similar research about the effect of acute bouts of exercise on functioning of the attentional networks13. CYCLING PARAMETER ESTIMATION TEST On the first session, participants

were informed about the details of the study and gave written informed consent. After that, participants practiced a reduced version of the ANT-I. Next, participants were fitted with a Polar

RS800 heart rate monitor (Polar Electro Ltd., Kempele, Finland). A magnetically braked cycle ergometer (Cardgirus Medical, G&G Innovación, La Bastida, Alava, Spain) was adjusted to

accommodate them to perform a graded submaximal test according to previous recommendations53. After a 7-min warm-up, the test started at an initial workload of 100 W, with increments of 30 W

every 4 min. The test was terminated when participants acknowledged voluntary exhaustion, could not maintain the minimum cadence of 60 revolutions per minute (rev · min−1) or when their

heart rate (HR) reached 95% of their maximum HR (HRmax) obtained from the age-predicted equation54: HRmax = 208 − 0.7 · Age. Finally, participants pedaled until their HR was under 120 beats

per minute (bpm) before getting off the cycle ergometer. Earlobe capillary blood samples were collected in the last 15 s of each stage and were analyzed by a blood lactate test meter

(Lactate Pro LT-1710, Arkay KDK, Japan). Power output and HR were continuously monitored using a sampling rate of 1 Hz. Determination of the LT was based on the criteria established by

previous studies55. Workload at LT was defined as the power output elicited at the stage before LT. HR at LT was estimated as the statistical mode value of HR at the stage before LT. These

results were used to set the individual exercise workloads in the exercising experimental conditions. MATERIALS AND PROCEDURE USED IN THE EXPERIMENTAL SESSIONS Prior to each experimental

session and upon their arrival in the lab, participants were weighed and given a capsule containing their previously assigned intake substance. We used a double-blind design to manipulate

this variable. Caffeine (4 mg · kg −1 pure anhydrous powder) and placebo (pregelatinized starch powder) were administered in identical color, size, weight, and shape capsules with _ad

libitum_ water. Dosage was selected based on a previous review51 which suggested doses from 3 to 6 mg · kg−1, and considering the recommendations by European Food Safety Authority56. Next,

participants were asked to take a 45-minute break to allow for sufficient plasma concentrations of caffeine after consumption57. Participants completed the ANT-I task at approximately 60 cm

from the computer monitor in a dimly-lit laboratory. A headphone set was used to deliver the acoustic alerting signal. Two computers were used simultaneously in the experimental set-up. One

was used to run E-Prime software58 presenting stimuli and collecting the participants’ responses during the attentional task in all experimental conditions. The other computer was used to

run Cardgirus® software adjusting and collecting power output and HR data during exercise conditions. In the rest condition, participants completed ANT-I while sitting on a chair. Previous

findings have shown that the efficiency of some brain areas and systems involved in cognitive arousal and cognitive resources is related with physiological exercise workload-induced

changes44,45. During the exercise conditions, participants performed the attentional task while cycling on the ergometer at 80% of their workload at LT. This intensity has been used in

previous studies investigating the effect of acute exercise on attentional networks13, in which physiological variables (e.g., HR blood flow and lactate) were maintained in a moderate

aerobic steady-state zone during the whole session. With the aim of keeping physiological response (HR) in a steady-state zone, a 10-min incremental warm-up was used to reach the initial

predetermined exercise workload. Workload could be regulated lightly by the experimenter manually throughout the exercise sessions to maintain each individuals’ HR in the target steady-state

zone. To confirm that participants performed the cognitive task under a steady state metabolic during both rest and exercise sessions, blood was drawn from their earlobes for lactate

analysis at the beginning and immediately after finishing the attentional task. Moreover, HR was monitored during the whole sessions. ATTENTIONAL TASK (ANT-I) The participants’ task was to

respond as quickly and accurately as possible by pressing the left or right key placed on the handlebar. Participants responded to the direction of the target stimulus (a central target

arrow 0.55° long pointing either left or right), which was flanked by two identical to the target irrelevant arrows on each side (0.06° away from each other). On each trial, an acoustic

alerting tone (2000 Hz and 50 ms) and/or spatial orienting visual cue (an asterisk 0.6° long and 50 ms) preceded the target arrow. Participants were strongly encouraged to keep their eyes

fixed on the fixation point (variable duration of 400–1600 ms) throughout the trial. The sequence of events for each trial is shown in Fig. 2. The interference variable was defined according

to the congruency of the direction of the flankers and target arrows: congruent trials (50% of trials), when the target was flanked by arrows pointing in the same direction, and incongruent

trials (the other 50% of trials), when the flanking arrows and the target pointed in opposite directions. The orienting signal was presented in two thirds of the trials above or below the

fixation point. Three orienting conditions were thus established according to the presence of the cue; cued location trials, when the cue was presented at the same location as the target;

uncued location trials, when the cue was presented at the opposite location to the target, or absence of cue, no-cue trials, when the cue was not presented. The alerting signal was presented

before the onset of the target in only half of the trials. The alerting variable was established according to the presence (tone) or absence (no tone) of the alerting sound. The target was

presented until participants responded or for 1800 ms. After the response, or after the maximum time had elapsed, the fixation point was presented for a variable duration (depending on the

RT of the preceding trial and the duration of the initial display for that trial) so that all trials were equally long. Initially, participants completed a practice block of 48 trials,

followed by five experimental blocks of 48 trials each, with resting intervals of about 1 min between them, but maintaining constant cycling parameters in the exercise sessions. Thus,

participants performed the ANT-I for approximately 25 min in each experimental session. The exercise sessions required longer time (about 35 min) because the warm-up stage was necessary to

reach the physiological steady state to perform the 25 min of continuous cycling at the pre-established HR and exercise workload. Both the workload intensities and the duration made it

possible to obtain the required amount of data from the attentional task during exercise, maintaining a physiological steady state while avoiding fatigue in the participants. Results

regarding physiological response to each Activity and Intake condition confirm the high level of stability of the variables used for measuring physiological response to exercise. DESIGN AND

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We conducted a mixed repeated-measures MANOVA on the data of each dependent variable (HR, RT, and accuracy), with caffeine Consumption Habit (low, moderate) as a

between-group factor, and the other independent variables (Intake: caffeine, placebo; Activity: rest, exercise; Alerting: tone, no tone; Orienting: uncued, no cue, cued; and Congruency:

congruent, incongruent) as within- participant factors. Subsequent ANOVAs were performed for mean RT and overall error percentages to analyze the general effects of Consumption Habit,

Intake, and Activity on each attentional function. Post hoc analyses (paired _t_-tests) were conducted to further explore significant interactions. RESULTS PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS Descriptive

statistics of anthropometric and physiological characteristics of the whole sample and separately for low and moderate caffeine consumers are displayed in Table 1. No significant differences

were observed between groups in none of these variables (all _p_s > 0.2). The Mean _(M)_ and Standard Deviation _(SD)_ of HR and lactate values per experimental session are displayed in

Table 2. In order to confirm whether the applied exercise workload and caffeine intake induced different changes in physiological state in each intake group of participants, a mixed 2

(Habit) × 2 (Intake) × 2 (Activity) MANOVA was performed on participants’ average HR values, with Habit as a between-group factor. Results showed a significant main effect of Activity,

_F_(1, 22) = 4158.19, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.99, indicating that HR increased by 56 bpm from the rest to the exercise condition. However, caffeine intake did not modulate HR (_p_ = 0.321).

Similarly, Consumption Habit did not modulate HR response under either Activity (_p_ = 0.238) or Intake (_p_ = 0.841) conditions. ATTENTIONAL NETWORKS FUNCTIONING Incorrect responses

(1.63%), and those with RT faster than 200 ms (considered as anticipations) or slower than 3 SD above the overall mean (1.28%; considered as lapses) were discarded from the analysis of RT.

Mean RTs were computed with the remaining RTs and submitted to the corresponding analyses. Mean RTs and error percentages per experimental condition are displayed in Table 3. A first

analysis was carried out on the Mean RTs and Error percentages to test the general functioning of the ANTI task in this population. The 2 (Alerting) × 3 (Orienting) × 2 (Congruency) repeated

measures ANOVA performed on Mean RTs showed the usual results, i.e., main effects for each variable, _F_(1, 23) = 55.41, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.71, _F_(2, 46) = 165.36, _p_ < 0.001, η2 =

 0.88, and _F_(1, 23) = 628.54, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.96 (for Alerting, Orienting and Congruency respectively), and the usual Alerting × Orienting, _F_(2, 46) = 52.97, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 

0.70 (larger cueing effect with the alerting signal), Alerting × Congruency, _F_(1, 23) = 25.33, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.52 (larger flanker-congruency effect with the alerting signal) and

Orienting × Congruency interactions, _F_(2, 46) = 35.86, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.61 (smaller flanker-congruency effect for cued than uncued trials). The corresponding analysis performed on

the error percentages showed similar results with _F_(1, 23) = 3.98, _p_ < 0.058, η2 = 0.15, _F_(2, 46) = 11.96, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.34, and _F_(1, 23) = 32.57, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 

0.59 for the main effects of Alerting, Orienting and Congruency respectively. Similarly, the usual Alerting × Congruency and Orienting × Congruency interactions were also significant, _F_(1,

23) = 7.10, _p_ < 0.014, η2 = 0.24, and _F_(2, 46) = 13.06, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.36, respectively (the Alerting × Orienting did not reach statistical significance, _F_(2, 46) = 1.92,

_p_ < 0.158, η2 = 0.08). Importantly, when Consumption habit, Intake, and Activity were added to the analysis, these variables modulated the main effect of some of the attentional

variables, but no interaction between attentional variables was modulated. Therefore, in order to have a closer look to the data, 4 different ANOVAs were performed, one for Mean RT (and

overall error percentages) to analyze the general effects of Consumption habit, Intake, and Activity, and one for each attentional network to analyze how they affect attentional performance.

OVERALL EFFECTS OF CONSUMPTION HABIT, INTAKE, AND ACTIVITY A 2 (Consumption habit) × 2 (Intake) × 2 (Activity) mixed ANOVA was performed on Mean RT and percentage of errors, with

Consumption habit as a between-participants factor and the other variables as within participants variables. RT results revealed a significant main effect of Activity, _F_(1, 22) = 91.70,

_p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.81, with 50 ms faster RT in the exercise than the rest condition. Although Intake did not modulate significantly RT, both the Activity × Intake and the three-way

Activity × Intake × Consumption habit interactions were significant, _F_(1, 22) = 4.86, _p_ = 0.038, η2 = 0.18, and _F_(1, 22) = 7.74, _p_ = 0.011, η2 = 0.26, respectively. Partial ANOVAs

showed that the effect of Intake was only observed at rest in moderate caffeine consumers, _F_(1, 11) = 16.68, _p_ = 0.002, η2 = 0.60 (F < 1 in the remaining cases). As can be observed in

Fig. 3, whereas exercise led to faster RT in all cases, caffeine intake led to 37 ms faster RT but only at rest and in moderate caffeine consumers. The corresponding analysis on the error

percentages only revealed a main effect of Activity, _F_(1, 22) = 19.65, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.47, showing that participants made slightly more errors (0.73%) in the exercise than the rest

condition. ALERTNESS A 2 (Consumption habit) × 2 (Intake) × 2 (Activity) × 2 (Alertness; No Tone vs. Tone) mixed MANOVA was performed on Mean RT. Following previous studies12, only data from

the no cue condition was considered for this analysis. A main effect of Alertness was observed, _F_(1, 22) = 109.75, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.83, with 31 ms faster RT for the Tone than the No

Tone condition. More importantly, this alertness effect was modulated by both Intake and Activity, _F_(1, 22) = 4.91, _p_ = 0.037, η2 = 0.18, and _F_(1, 22) = 4.99, _p_ = 0.036, η2 = 0.18,

respectively. The four-way interaction was also significant, _F_(1, 22) = 5.13, _p_ = 0.034, η2 = 0.19, showing a marginal reduction of alertness effect with caffeine intake (compared with

no intake), in low consumers at the exercise condition (see top panel of Fig. 4), _F_(1, 11) = 4.47, _p_ = 0.058, η2 = 0.29, but a significant reduction in moderate consumers at the rest

condition (see bottom panel of Fig. 4), _F_(1, 11) = 5.15, _p_ = 0.044, η2 = 0.32. The corresponding analysis of the error percentages only revealed as significant the Intake × Alertness

interaction, _F_(1, 22) = 5.74, _p_ = 0.026, η2 = 0.21. Whereas after caffeine intake slightly more errors (0.61%) were made in the presence of the tone than when it was absent, less errors

(0.30%) were made when the tone was present in the placebo intake condition. ORIENTING A 2 (Consumption habit) × 2 (Intake) × 2 (Activity) × 2 (Orienting; uncued, no cue, cued) mixed MANOVA

was performed on Mean RT. The expected main effect of Orienting was highly significant, _F_(2, 44) = 153.27, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.87. More interestingly, Orienting was modulated by

Activity, _F_(2, 44) = 13.48, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.38, leading to reduced orienting effects in the exercise condition in both groups, as shown in Fig. 4 (top and bottom panels). Both the

costs (uncued minus no cue), _F_(1, 22) = 6.46, _p_ < 0.019, η2 = 0.23, and the benefits (no cue minus cued), _F_(1, 22) = 10.78, _p_ = 0.003, η2 = 0.33, were reduced in the exercise (30

and 19, respectively) compared to the rest (22 and 11 ms, respectively) condition. The corresponding analysis or error percentages also showed a significant mean effect of orienting, _F_(2,

44) = 12.01, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.35. Additionally, a significant Intake × Orienting interaction was found observing larger orienting effect in the caffeine intake (1.98%) than in the

placebo intake (0.80%) condition, _F_(2, 44) = 3.39, _p_ = 0.043, η2 = 0.13. CONTROL A 2 (Consumption habit) × 2 (Intake) × 2 (Activity) × 2 (Congruency; Congruent vs. Incongruent) mixed

MANOVA was performed on Mean RT. The main effect of congruency was highly significant, _F_(1, 22) = 672.79, _p_ < 0.001, η2 = 0.97, with 70 ms faster RT for the Congruent than the

Incongruent condition. This effect was not modulated by any variable. The analogous analysis of error percentages revealed a significant main effect of congruency, _F_(1, 22) = 31.22, _p_ 

< 0.001, η2 = 0.59. Interestingly, this effect was modulated by Activity, _F_(1, 22) = 8.31, _p_ = 0.009, η2 = 0.27, with larger interference being observed in the exercise (3.10%) than

in the rest (2.16%) condition. Figure 4 depicts the attentional index of the functioning of each attentional network, as a function of Activity, Caffeine intake and consumer habits.

DISCUSSION The present study is the first to measure the effect of caffeine on attention considering its multifunctional nature (alerting, orienting, and executive control) under two

different physical effort conditions and using two groups of participants selected according to their caffeine consumption habit. Attentional functioning was assessed under caffeine and

placebo intake conditions at rest and during moderate aerobic steady-state exercise. Previous studies attempting to explore the interactions between exercise and caffeine and their effects

on cognition have shown controversial results due to methodological issues: different caffeine dosage and participant’s consumption habit and withdrawal40, or moment of cognitive evaluation

(before, during or after completion of physical effort34,59). Importantly, and considering the recommendations by previous authors, here we tried to control the modulation of different

variables that could affect the caffeine effect (individual caffeine dosage and participant’s consumption habits) during exercising. Our results replicated the general facilitating effect of

exercise on speed of response, previously described by similar studies13,21, probably related to a shift in the speed-accuracy trade-off toward response speed44. More importantly for the

aims of the present study, our results have shown rather specific effects of caffeine intake on both reaction speed and the efficiency of the alerting network. Caffeine intake reduced the

effect of alerting signals on response speed in low caffeine consumers when they were exercising. Contrarily, for more habitual caffeine consumers caffeine intake only reduced alertness at

rest. Regarding exercise modulations of RT, our results indicated that the applied exercise workload induced a significant enhancement of physiological state (HR and lactate accumulation) in

both low and moderate caffeine consumers and, more importantly, that exercise shortened response speed in all experimental conditions, while reduced only slightly the response accuracy. In

line with previous accounts, our results replicated the finding about the benefit on response speed during aerobic exercise (below the LT)5,13,21,60,61. These results could be partially

explained by the arousal theory and increases of adrenaline-noradrenaline secretion induced by exercise45. McMorris44 has recently described a more comprehensive framework to explain how

acute exercise affects cognition from a neurochemical perspective. The author reviewed the litarature showing that intrinsic exercise variables (as duration or intensity) modulate the

secretion of different neurochemical factors (catecholamines, cortisol and BDNF). In our study, the slight reduction of response accuracy in the flankers task is in agreement with previous

studies10,44,62, pointing to the stress level induced by moderate aerobic exercise, which mildly modulates in the sympathetic-adrenal and vagal/nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) pathway to

impair accuracy compared to higher intensities. Concerning caffeine intake, and similarly to findings included in a recent meta-analysis63, our results did not show any main effect of

caffeine on HR, lactate accumulation and RT during exercise in any of the controlled experimental conditions. These results are partially incongruent with the resounding evidence of

significantly faster RT under caffeine intake conditions due to increase of adrenaline-noradrenaline secretion64 using a broad variety of methodological approaches. However, most of these

studies underscored the importance of exploring these effects in a range of participant consumption profiles and under different exercising conditions. Importantly, and according to our

expectations, the effect of caffeine intake on performance was moderated by both variables (consum habit and exercise), observing that caffeine shortened RT only in moderate caffeine

consumers at rest. Yet, importantly, moderate consumers were significantly slower under the placebo-rest condition than low consumers. Our results could be explained by the onset of a

withdrawal effect associated with caffeine deprivation in participants more habituated to caffeine consumption (moderate consumers) in conditions where tonic arousal was lower (i.e., the

placebo and rest condition), but they equate to non consumers when external arousing stimuli appear (i.e., exercising, caffeine intake or alerting signals). These finding are in agreement

with the poorer performance observed under caffeine deprivation of habitual coffee consumers65,66. Increases of adrenaline-noradrenaline secretion induced by exercise45,67 and caffeine64

could justify the greater effect of caffeine on RT under the rest condition, when baseline arousal level is lower. According to caffeine and exercise modulations of attentional networks, our

results replicated the typical pattern of results about the general functioning of the ANTI task in this population (main effects and interactions between attentional networks) on mean RTs

and error both at rest12 and during exercise conditions13. More importantly for the purpose of the current study, our results revealed that the effect of caffeine on phasic alertness was

moderated by the consum habit and exercise condition simultaneously. Caffeine intake reduced the effect of alerting signals on RT in low consumers when they were exercising, but contrarily,

caffeine induced a lower alertness effect in moderate consumers at the rest condition. In line with previous accounts using a similar attentional tasks, we observed a reduction of alerting

acoustic signals effect under exercising13,25. This interaction could be expected by taking into account that caffeine interacts with the dopaminergic systems64, and that the alertness

attentional network activates dense dopaminergic innervated areas68. However, and contrarily to Brunyé _et al_. using the ANT, who observed a lower alerting size effect under placebo

compared to both the 200 mg and 400 mg caffeine intake conditions in low consumers37, our data showed a larger alerting effect under placebo than under caffeine intake conditions.

Interestingly, the differences between our results and those obtained by Brunyé and colleagues36,37 could be related to the different measure of the alerting function as assessed with the

Attentional Network Test (ANT) vs. the ANT-I used here. The ANT uses a less arousing visual cue to measure alertness, whereas the ANT-I uses an auditory cue, which seems to be more effective

in producing alertness69. Thus, a more arousing alerting cue in our study produced larger alertness in the reduced tonic activation condition (placebo intake), whereas a less arousing cue

lead to larger alertness only when added by cafeine intake arousal. This idea is supported by previous findings36 suggesting that, given that caffeine upregulates dopaminergic availability,

more habituated caffeine consumers may need higher doses to reach a similar “baseline” state of vigilance than less habitual consumers. Taken altogether, our results seem to suggest that

higher phasic alertness (due to slower responses in no tone conditions) is usually observed under conditions of reduced tonic vigilance, as in rest and placebo conditions in the present

study or morning-type individuals when tested in the evening46. According to the observed interaction between all “arousing” variables (alerting stimulus, activity and caffeine intake), our

results are coherent with the hypothesis whereby the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system is activated in a similar manner by these variables70. Concerning the orienting network, results

revealed that, compared to the rest condition, only exercise modulated this function inducing a decrease in spatial attentional orienting, both in attentional benefits and attentional costs.

Our results are partially consistent with others showing a reduction of the spatial orienting effect21, and revealing a deployment of exogenous spatial attention after a bout of intense

aerobic exercise22. Present results may indicate that exercise-induced physiological changes activate the attentional system, making it more reactive to relevant peripheral stimuli, and

therefore being less affected by irrelevant cues. However, our finding is somewhat in contrast with other study using the ANT-I task during an aerobic exercise in a group of highly skilled

cyclists and did not observe an interaction between exercising and exogenous visual spatial attention13. These controversial results could be explained by previous findings showing that

exercising affect spatial visual orienting differently depending on the participant’s physical fitness level22 and motor expertise71. Further research investigating the exercise-attentional

networks functioning interactions should consider the role of both moderators (physical fitness and/ or motor skills). Regarding the effect of caffeine on the orienting function, we

replicated previous results observed in high consumers by Brunyé and colleagues37 showing that caffeine did not modulate the orienting network function when response speed was considered,

although they found a marginal effect of caffeine on orienting in low consumers when using larger doses than the ones used in the present study. Overall, these results support the idea that

caffeine-induced changes in orienting may depend on the caffeine doses used and individuals’ consumption habit. The absence of a significant interaction between caffeine and visual orienting

has been explained by arguing that the brain areas involved in attentional orienting (superior parietal lobe brain areas)72 have sparse dopaminergic innervation, while dopamine is the

neurotransmitter affected by caffeine. In regard to the executive control network our results are in line with previous findings9,13 showing no evidence of any modulation of executive

control performance by exercise. However, regarding the effect of caffeine on executive functioning, our results challenge those previously described by Brunyé and colleagues demonstrating

that the group of low-caffeine consumers exhibited dose-dependent increases in the executive control function (at doses from 0 to 400 mg)36,37. Yet, the daily caffeine intake of participants

almost doubled the intake of the low consumers in our study. CONCLUSIONS Our results support the assumption that exercise speeds up response ability by modulating exogenous stimulus-driven

attentional functions (i.e., alerting and exogenous spatial orienting). These findings could be explained in terms of exercise-induced increases in physiological arousal and consequently a

better efficiency of peripheral motor processes during exercise conditions. Nevertheless, this hypothesis should be verified by further research, for instance, by exploring the relationship

between electromyographic response and attentional networks functioning during exercise. Importantly, our results show that caffeine and exercise have a similar effect on performance,

speeding up motor responses, but this effect is moderated by the caffeine consume habit. In this regard, habitual caffeine intake induces a reduction of tonic arousal, which turns comparable

to the level in non-consumers when other arousing stimulus appear (exercise, caffeine intake or alerting signals). Given the interaction between these two variables (activity and caffeine),

we can assume that they both increase general activation in a similar way. However, the absence of interactions between Intake and Activity with regard to orienting and executive control

suggests that exercise and caffeine are different modulators of attention. Only in the case of the modulation over the general activation indexed by alertness these two variables seems to

interact. It seems that each attentional network, depending on its behavioral significance, is modulated differently by internal and external “arousing” conditions. Overall, the results of

this study suggest that caffeine intake seems to be necessary in more habituated caffeine consumers to reach an optimal level of general arousal and respond in low “arousing” situations

(i.e., rest conditions). Caffeine deprivation periods in more habitual consumers may impair RT performance due to lower general activation at baseline related to dopamine availability

conditions. The systematic control and administration of acute and habitual personalized caffeine doses is relevant in order to optimize the balance between physiological and cognitive cost

and benefits. These recommendations could be extended to different contexts where caffeine consumption is habitual to cope with the high demands of vigilance and accurate decision making

during prolonged time, as in professional drivers, pilots or air traffic controllers. DATA AVAILABILITY The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available

in the OSFHOME repository, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/VZ6NH, https://osf.io/vz6nh/?view_only=a7ee034bb2cf47ba8f4b3f0bf6a139e9. REFERENCES * Petersen, S. E. & Posner, M. I. The attention system

of the human brain: 20 years after. _Annu. Rev. Neurosci._ 35, 73–89 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Miller, E. K. The prefrontal cortex and cognitive

control. _Nat. Rev. Neurosci._ 1, 59–65 (2000). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Posner, M. I. Orienting of attention. _Q. J. Exp. Psychol._ 32, 3–25 (1980). Article  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Audiffren, M., Tomporowski, P. D. & Zagrodnik, J. Acute aerobic exercise and information processing: modulation of executive control in a Random Number Generation task.

_Acta Psychol. (Amst.)_ 132, 85–95 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Pesce, C. & Audiffren, M. Does acute exercise switch off switch costs? A study with younger and older athletes. _J.

Sport Exerc. Psychol._ 33, 609–626 (2011). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Dietrich, A. Transient hypofrontality as a mechanism for the psychological effects of exercise. _Psychiatry

Res._ 145, 79–83 (2006). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pontifex, M. B. & Hillman, C. H. Neuroelectric and behavioral indices of interference control during acute cycling. _Clin.

Neurophysiol._ 118, 570–580 (2007). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Del Giorno, J. M., Hall, E. E., O’Leary, K. C., Bixby, W. R. & Miller, P. C. Cognitive function during acute

exercise: a test of the transient hypofrontality theory. _J. Sport Exerc. Psychol._ 32, 312–323 (2010). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Davranche, K., Hall, B. & McMorris, T. Effect

of acute exercise on cognitive control required during an Eriksen flanker task. _J. Sport Exerc. Psychol._ 31, 628–639 (2009). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chang, Y.-K., Pesce, C.,

Chiang, Y.-T., Kuo, C.-Y. & Fong, D.-Y. Antecedent acute cycling exercise affects attention control: an ERP study using attention network test. _Front. Hum. Neurosci._ 9, 156 (2015).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Posner, M. I. & Petersen, S. E. The attention system of the human brain. _Annu. Rev. Neurosci._ 13, 25–42 (1990). Article  CAS  PubMed

  Google Scholar  * Callejas, A., Lupianez, J. & Tudela, P. The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions. _Brain Cogn._ 54, 225–227 (2004). Article  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Huertas, F., Zahonero, J., Sanabria, D. & Lupiáñez, J. Functioning of the attentional networks at rest vs. during acute bouts of aerobic exercise. _J. Sport Exerc.

Psychol._ 33, 649–665 (2011). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pesce, C., Capranica, L., Tessitore, A. & Figura, F. Focusing of visual attention under submaximal physical load. _Int.

J. Sport Exerc. Psychol._ 1, 275–292 (2003). Article  Google Scholar  * Pesce, C., Cereatti, L., Casella, R., Baldari, C. & Capranica, L. Preservation of visual attention in older expert

orienteers at rest and under physical effort. _J. Sport Exerc. Psychol._ 29, 78–99 (2007). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pesce, C., Cereatti, L., Forte, R., Crova, C. & Casella, R.

Acute and chronic exercise effects on attentional control in older road cyclists. _Gerontology_ 57, 121–128 (2011). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pesce, C., Tessitore, A., Casella, R.,

Pirritano, M. & Capranica, L. Focusing of visual attention at rest and during physical exercise in soccer players. _J. Sports Sci._ 25, 1259–1270 (2007). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  * Condello, G. _et al_. Steps to health in cognitive aging: Effects of physical activity on spatial attention and executive control in the elderly. _Front. Hum. Neurosci_. 11 (2017). *

Pesce, C., Casella, R. & Caprancia, L. Modulation of visuospatial attention at rest and during physical exercise: Gender differences. _Int. J. Sport Psychol._ 35, 328–341 (2004). Google

Scholar  * Cereatti, L., Casella, R., Manganelli, M. & Pesce, C. Visual attention in adolescents: Facilitating effects of sport expertise and acute physical exercise. _Psychol. Sport

Exerc._ 10, 136–145 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Sanabria, D. _et al_. Effects of acute aerobic exercise on exogenous spatial attention. _Psychol. Sport Exerc._ 12, 570–574 (2011).

Article  Google Scholar  * Llorens, F., Sanabria, D. & Huertas, F. The influence of acute intense exercise on exogenous spatial attention depends on physical fitness level. _Exp.

Psychol._ 62, 20–29 (2015). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Oken, B. S., Salinsky, M. C. & Elsas, S. M. Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and

measurement. _Clin. Neurophysiol._ 117, 1885–1901 (2006). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Posner, M. I. Measuring alertness. _Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci._ 1129, 193–199

(2008). Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mahoney, C. R., Hirsch, E., Hasselquist, L., Lesher, L. L. & Lieberman, H. R. The effects of movement and physical exertion on soldier

vigilance. _Aviat. Space Environ. Med._ 78, B51–B57 (2007). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Smit, A. S., Eling, P. A. T. M., Hopman, M. T. & Coenen, A. M. L. Mental and physical effort affect

vigilance differently. _Int. J. Psychophysiol._ 57, 211–217 (2005). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Eddy, M. D. _et al_. The effects of load carriage and physical fatigue on cognitive

performance. _PloS One_ 10, e0130817 (2015). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Astorino, T. A. & Roberson, D. W. Efficacy of acute caffeine ingestion for short-term

high-intensity exercise performance: a systematic review. _J. Strength Cond. Res._ 24, 257–265 (2010). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * McLellan, T. M., Caldwell, J. A. & Lieberman, H.

R. A review of caffeine’s effects on cognitive, physical and occupational performance. _Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev._ 71, 294–312 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tieges, Z. _et

al_. Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching. _Biol. Psychol._ 73, 101–113 (2006). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tieges, Z., Snel, J., Kok, A., Plat, N. &

Ridderinkhof, R. Effects of caffeine on anticipatory control processes: evidence from a cued task-switch paradigm. _Psychophysiology_ 44, 561–578 (2007). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Tieges, Z., Snel, J., Kok, A. & Richard Ridderinkhof, K. Caffeine does not modulate inhibitory control. _Brain Cogn._ 69, 316–327 (2009). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hogervorst,

E., Riedel, W., Kovacs, E., Brouns, F. & Jolles, J. Caffeine improves cognitive performance after strenuous physical exercise. _Int. J. Sports Med._ 20, 354–361 (1999). Article  CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hogervorst, E. _et al_. Caffeine improves physical and cognitive performance during exhaustive exercise. _Med. Sci. Sports Exerc._ 40, 1841–1851 (2008). Article 

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ali, A. _et al_. Caffeine ingestion enhances perceptual responses during intermittent exercise in female team-game players. _J. Sports Sci._ 34, 330–341

(2016). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., Lieberman, H. R., Giles, G. E. & Taylor, H. A. Acute caffeine consumption enhances the executive control of

visual attention in habitual consumers. _Brain Cogn._ 74, 186–192 (2010). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., Lieberman, H. R. & Taylor, H. A. Caffeine

modulates attention network function. _Brain Cogn._ 72, 181–188 (2010). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Church, D. D. _et al_. The effect of an acute ingestion of Turkish coffee on

reaction time and time trial performance. _J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr._ 12, 37 (2015). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Connell, C. J. W., Thompson, B., Kuhn, G. & Gant,

N. Exercise-induced fatigue and caffeine supplementation affect psychomotor performance but not covert visuo-spatial attention. _PloS One_ 11, e0165318 (2016). Article  PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Einöther, S. J. L. & Giesbrecht, T. Caffeine as an attention enhancer: reviewing existing assumptions. _Psychopharmacology (Berl.)_ 225, 251–274 (2013).

Article  Google Scholar  * Snel, J. & Lorist, M. M. Effects of caffeine on sleep and cognition. _Prog. Brain Res._ 190, 105–117 (2011). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Childs, E.

& De Wit, H. Subjective, behavioral, and physiological effects of acute caffeine in light, nondependent caffeine users. _Psychopharmacology (Berl.)_ 185, 514–523 (2006). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Haskell, C. F., Kennedy, D. O., Wesnes, K. A. & Scholey, A. B. Cognitive and mood improvements of caffeine in habitual consumers and habitual non-consumers of caffeine.

_Psychopharmacology (Berl.)_ 179, 813–825 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * McMorris, T. _Exercise-cognition interaction: Neuroscience perspectives_. (Elsevier Academic Press, 2016).

* Chmura, J., Krysztofiak, H., Ziemba, A. W., Nazar, K. & Kaciuba-Usciko, H. Psychomotor performance during prolonged exercise above and below the blood lactate threshold. _Eur. J. Appl.

Physiol._ 77, 77–80 (1998). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Matchock, R. L. & Mordkoff, J. T. Chronotype and time-of-day influences on the alerting, orienting, and executive components

of attention. _Exp. Brain Res._ 192, 189–198 (2009). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Miró, E. _et al_. Attentional deficits in fibromyalgia and its relationships with pain, emotional

distress and sleep dysfunction complaints. _Psychol. Health_ 26, 765–780 (2011). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Roca, J. _et al_. The effects of sleep deprivation on the attentional

functions and vigilance. _Acta Psychol. (Amst.)_ 140, 164–176 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Callejas, A., Lupiàñez, J., Funes, M. J. & Tudela, P. Modulations among the alerting,

orienting and executive control networks. _Exp. Brain Res._ 167, 27–37 (2005). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible

statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. _Behav. Res. Methods_ 39, 175–191 (2007). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Paluska, S. A. Caffeine

and exercise. _Curr. Sports Med. Rep._ 2, 213–219 (2003). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * James, J. E. _Caffeine and health_. (Academic Press London, 1991). * Craig, N. _et al_. Protocols

for the physiological assessment of high performance track, road and mountain cyclists. In _Physiological tests for elite athletes_ (Human Kinetics, 2000). * Tanaka, H., Monahan, K. &

Seals, D. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. _J. Am. Coll. Cardiol._ 37, 153–156 (2001). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * López Chicharro, J. & López Mojares, L. M.

_Fisiología clínica del ejercicio_. (Ed. Médica Panamericana, 2008). * EFSA. Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine. _EFSA J._ 13, 4102 (2015). Google Scholar  * Arnaud, M. J. The

pharmacology of caffeine. _Prog. Drug Res._ 31, 273–313 (1987). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Schneider, W., Eschman, A. & Zucolotto, A. _E-Prime user’s guide_. (Psychology Software

Tools Inc., 2002). * Crowe, M. J., Leicht, A. S. & Spinks, W. L. Physiological and cognitive responses to caffeine during repeated, high-intensity exercise. _Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc.

Metab._ 16, 528–544 (2006). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Davranche, K. & Audiffren, M. Facilitating effects of exercise on information processing. _J. Sports Sci._ 22, 419–428

(2004). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fernandes, A., Medeiros, A. R., Del Rosso, S., Stults-Kolehmainen, M. & Boullosa, D. A. The influence of exercise and physical fitness status

on attention: a systematic review. _Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol_. 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2018.1455889 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * McMorris, T. & Hale, B. J.

Differential effects of differing intensities of acute exercise on speed and accuracy of cognition: a meta-analytical investigation. _Brain Cogn._ 80, 338–351 (2012). Article  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Glaister, M. & Gissane, C. Caffeine and physiological responses to submaximal exercise: A meta-analysis. _Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform._ 13, 402–411 (2018). Article 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ferré, S. An update on the mechanisms of the psychostimulant effects of caffeine. _J. Neurochem._ 105, 1067–1079 (2008). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lane, J.

D. & Phillips-Bute, B. G. Caffeine deprivation affects vigilance performance and mood. _Physiol. Behav._ 65, 171–175 (1998). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Juliano, L. M. &

Griffiths, R. R. A critical review of caffeine withdrawal: empirical validation of symptoms and signs, incidence, severity, and associated features. _Psychopharmacology (Berl.)_ 176, 1–29

(2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chmura, J., Nazar, K. & Kaciuba-Uscilko, H. Choice reaction time during graded exercise in relation to blood lactate and plasma catecholamine

thresholds. _Int. J. Sports Med._ 15, 172–176 (1994). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lumme, V., Aalto, S., Ilonen, T., Någren, K. & Hietala, J. Dopamine D2/D3 receptor binding

in the anterior cingulate cortex and executive functioning. _Psychiatry Res._ 156, 69–74 (2007). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ishigami, Y. & Klein, R. M. Repeated measurement

of the components of attention using two versions of the Attention Network Test (ANT): Stability, isolability, robustness, and reliability. _J. Neurosci. Methods_ 190, 117–128 (2010).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Aston-Jones, G. & Cohen, J. D. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. _Annu. Rev.

Neurosci._ 28, 403–450 (2005). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Abernethy, B. Visual search in sport and ergonomics: Its relationship to selective attention and performer expertise.

_Hum. Perform._ 1, 205 (1988). Article  Google Scholar  * Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., Flombaum, J. I. & Posner, M. I. The activation of attentional networks. _Neuroimage_

26, 471–479 (2005). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Prof. Bruce Milliken for his stimulating discussions and proofreading of a first version of

the manuscript during a research stay of F.H. at McMaster University. This research was supported by Universidad Católica de Valencia “San Vicente Mártir” grant (2019-158-003) to F.H. and

by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (PSI2017-84926-P) to J.L. & F.H. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to

publish, or preparation of the manuscript. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia “San Vicente

Mártir”, Valencia, Spain Florentino Huertas, Esther Blasco & Consuelo Moratal * Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of

Granada, Granada, Spain Juan Lupiañez Authors * Florentino Huertas View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Esther Blasco View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Consuelo Moratal View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Juan

Lupiañez View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS Conceived and designed the experiments: F.H., E.B. and J.L. Performed the

experiments: F.H, E.B. and C.M. Performed the initial processing of the data: F.H., E.B. and C.M. Analysed the data: F.H., E.B. and J.L. Wrote the manuscript: F.H. and J.L. All authors

contributed to the scientific discussion and reviewed the manuscript. Coordinated the research: F.H and J.L. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Florentino Huertas. ETHICS DECLARATIONS

COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published

maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,

adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons

license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a

credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted

use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT

THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Huertas, F., Blasco, E., Moratal, C. _et al._ Caffeine intake modulates the functioning of the attentional networks depending on consumption habits and acute

exercise demands. _Sci Rep_ 9, 10043 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46524-x Download citation * Received: 03 August 2018 * Accepted: 28 June 2019 * Published: 11 July 2019 * DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46524-x SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not

currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative