Crop asynchrony stabilizes food production

Crop asynchrony stabilizes food production


Play all audios:

Loading...

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe arising from D. Renard & D. Tilman _Nature_ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1316-y (2019) Stable agricultural systems are fundamental


for the reliability of agricultural production and food security. Recently, Renard and Tilman1 reported that crop diversity, calculated as the exponential value of the Shannon diversity


index of harvested areas of 176 crops, stabilizes national food production. Here we show that crop asynchrony—that is, asynchronous production trends between different crops2—is an even


better predictor of agricultural production stability than is crop diversity. Our finding suggests that asynchrony is one important property that can explain why a higher crop diversity


supports the stability of national food production, and that it should be considered in strategies to stabilize agricultural production through crop diversification. This is a preview of


subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value


online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more


Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS:


* Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support DATA AVAILABILITY All datasets used and generated during this study are provided in a public


repository: https://github.com/legli/AgriculturalStability. CODE AVAILABILITY The codes used for data preparation and analyses are provided in a public repository:


https://github.com/legli/AgriculturalStability. REFERENCES * Renard, D. & Tilman, D. National food production stabilized by crop diversity. _Nature_ 571, 257–260 (2019). Article  CAS 


Google Scholar  * Mehrabi, Z. & Ramankutty, N. Synchronized failure of global crop production. _Nat. Ecol. Evol_. 3, 780–786 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * Cottrell, R. S. et al.


Food production shocks across land and sea. _Nat. Sustain_. 2, 130–137 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * _The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics_ (FAO,


accessed 22 November 2019); https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/. * Marshall, M. G. _Codebook: Major Episodes of Political Violence (MEPV) and Conflict Regions, 1946–2015_.


http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/MEPVcodebook2016.pdf (2016). * Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Doelman, J. & Stehfest, E. New anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE


3.2. _Earth Syst. Sci. Data_ 9, 927–953 (2017). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Sacks, W. J., Deryng, D. & Foley, J. A. Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. _Glob. Ecol.


Biogeogr_. 19, 607–620 (2010). Google Scholar  * Willmott, C. J. & Matsuura, K. _Terrestrial Air Temperature and Precipitation: Monthly and Annual Time Series (1950–1999)_.


http://climate.geog.udel.edu/~climate/html_pages/README.ghcn_ts2.html (2001). * _Food balance sheets: A handbook_ (FAO, 2001). * R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical


Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019). * Loreau, M. & de Mazancourt, C. Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating


environments. _Am. Nat_. 172, E48–E66 (2008). Article  Google Scholar  * Hallett, L. M. et al. codyn : An R package of community dynamics metrics. _Methods Ecol. Evol_. 7, 1146–1151 (2016).


Article  Google Scholar  * Khoury, C. K. et al. Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 111, 4001–4006 (2014).


Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. _J. Stat. Softw_. 67, 1–48 (2015). Article 


Google Scholar  * Knapp, S. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture. _Nat. Commun_. 9, 3632 (2018). Article  ADS 


Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS L.E. acknowledges funding from the Helmholtz Association (Research School ESCALATE, VH-KO-613). We thank V. Grimm for discussions; M. Wu


for statistical support and D. Renard for discussions and the exchange of code to make our analysis clearer and more consistent. The FAOSTAT database is maintained and regularly updated by


FAO with regular support from its Member States. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany Lukas Egli, Matthias


Schröter & Ralf Seppelt * University of Potsdam, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Potsdam, Germany Lukas Egli * University of Münster, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Münster,


Germany Christoph Scherber * Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany Christoph Scherber * University of Göttingen, Agroecology,


Department of Crop Sciences, Göttingen, Germany Teja Tscharntke * University of Göttingen, Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), Göttingen, Germany Teja Tscharntke *


Institute of Geoscience and Geography, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany Ralf Seppelt Authors * Lukas Egli View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Matthias Schröter View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Christoph Scherber View author publications You


can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Teja Tscharntke View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ralf Seppelt View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS L.E., M.S., T.T. and R.S. designed the study. L.E. and C.S. performed the analysis. All authors wrote


the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Lukas Egli. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE


Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. EXTENDED DATA FIGURES AND TABLES EXTENDED DATA FIG. 1 MAIN


DETERMINANTS OF NATIONAL CALORIC PRODUCTION STABILITY. A–H, Effects of crop diversity (A), crop asynchrony (B), irrigation (C), nitrogen use intensity (D), temperature instability (E),


precipitation instability (F), warfare (G) and time (H) on caloric production stability. Results are shown for the linear regression models including crop diversity (green), crop asynchrony


(blue) and both (orange) (_n_ = 590). Irrigation and nitrogen use intensity were back-transformed from square-root-transformation, predicted values were back-transformed from


log-transformation. Predictions were calculated using the observed range of the focal predictor, while keeping all the other predictors at their mean values. Shaded areas represent 95%


confidence intervals. The figure was created with the statistical software package R 3.6.110. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS. REPORTING SUMMARY RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS


Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Egli, L., Schröter, M., Scherber, C. _et al._ Crop asynchrony stabilizes food production. _Nature_ 588, E7–E12 (2020).


https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2965-6 Download citation * Received: 12 February 2020 * Accepted: 30 September 2020 * Published: 09 December 2020 * Issue Date: 10 December 2020 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2965-6 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not


currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative