Advances in motility testing—current and novel approaches

Advances in motility testing—current and novel approaches


Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT Disorders of gastrointestinal motility are frequently seen in clinical practice. Apart from motility disorders, factors leading to lowered visceroperception thresholds are


recognized as commonly involved in the pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal disorders. The wide array of gastrointestinal motility and viscerosensitivity tests available is in


contrast with the relatively limited number of tests used universally in clinical practice. The main reason for this discrepancy is that the outcome of a test only becomes truly important


when it carries clinical consequences. The main goal of this Review is to assess the place of the presently available gastrointestinal motility and sensitivity tests in the clinical


armamentarium of the gastroenterologist. KEY POINTS * High-resolution manometry makes the assessment of oesophageal function easier and provides more information than conventional manometry


* Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring provides an opportunity to assess gastro-oesophageal reflux over prolonged periods of time in a patient-friendly fashion * Intraluminal impedance


monitoring of the oesophagus not only enables detection of nonacid reflux, but can also distinguish different belching types * Wireless motility capsule technology has made it possible to


study gastric emptying, small bowel transit and colonic transit in one noninvasive assessment * Several newly developed investigational tools (such as impedance planimetry and colonic


high-resolution manometry) are promising, but their diagnostic value is not yet clear Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via


your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this


article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in


* Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ASSOCIATIONS AMONG NEUROPHYSIOLOGY MEASURES IN IRRITABLE BOWEL


SYNDROME (IBS) AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR IBS SYMPTOMS Article Open access 17 June 2020 WEARABLE, EPIDERMAL DEVICES FOR ASSESSMENT OF SWALLOWING FUNCTION Article Open access 20 December 2023


UNDERSTANDING THE PHYSIOLOGY OF HUMAN DEFAECATION AND DISORDERS OF CONTINENCE AND EVACUATION Article 09 August 2021 REFERENCES * Spechler, S. J. & Castell, D. O. Classification of


oesophageal motility abnormalities. _Gut_ 49, 145–151 (2001). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Bredenoord, A. J. _ et al_. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal


motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 24 (Suppl. 1), 57–65 (2012). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Bogte, A.,


Bredenoord, A. J., Oors, J., Siersema, P. D. & Smout, A. J. Relationship between esophageal contraction patterns and clearance of swallowed liquid and solid boluses in healthy controls


and patients with dysphagia. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 24, e364–e372 (2012). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bredenoord, A. J. & Hebbard, G. S. Technical aspects of clinical


high-resolution manometry studies. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 24 (Suppl. 1), 5–10 (2012). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tutuian, R. & Castell, D. O. Rumination documented by using combined


multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry. _Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol._ 2, 340–343 (2004). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Dent, J. A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure


measurement. _Gastroenterology_ 71, 263–267 (1976). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Clouse, R. E., Staiano, A. & Alrakawi, A. Topographic analysis of esophageal double-peaked waves.


_Gastroenterology_ 118, 469–476 (2000). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ghosh, S. K., Pandolfino, J. E., Zhang, Q., Jarosz, A. & Kahrilas, P. J. Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter


relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry. _Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol._ 291, G525–G531 (2006). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Bredenoord, A. J., Weusten, B. L., Timmer, R. & Smout, A. J. Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux.


_Gastroenterology_ 130, 334–340 (2006). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pandolfino, J. E. _ et al_. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.


_Gastroenterology_ 135, 1526–1533 (2008). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fox, M. _ et al_. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically


important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 16, 533–542 (2004). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pandolfino, J. E., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A.


J. & Kahrilas, P. J. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 21,


796–806 (2009). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Levine, M. S., Rubesin, S. E. & Laufer, I. Barium esophagography: a study for all seasons. _Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol._


6, 11–25 (2008). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pouderoux, P., Shi, G., Tatum, R. P. & Kahrilas, P. J. Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry.


_Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 94, 1457–1463 (1999). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Galmiche, J. P. _ et al_. Functional esophageal disorders. _Gastroenterology_ 130, 1459–1465 (2006). PubMed 


Google Scholar  * El-Takli, I., O'Brien, P. & Paterson, W. G. Clinical diagnosis of achalasia: how reliable is the barium x-ray? _Can. J. Gastroenterol._ 20, 335–337 (2006). CAS 


PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Rohof, W. O., Lei, A. & Boeckxstaens, G. E. Esophageal stasis on a timed barium esophagogram predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with


long-standing achalasia. _Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 108, 49–55 (2013). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Clouse, R. E., Prakash, C. & Haroian, L. R. Symptom association tests are improved by


the extended ambulatory pH recording time with the Bravo capsule [abstract]. _Gastroenterology_ 124, A537 (2003). Google Scholar  * Pandolfino, J. E. _ et al_. Comparison of the Bravo


wireless and Digitrapper catheter-based pH monitoring systems for measuring esophageal acid exposure. _Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 100, 1466–1476 (2005). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hakanson, B.


S., Berggren, P., Granqvist, S., Ljungqvist, O. & Thorell, A. Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. _Scand. J. Gastroenterol._


44, 276–283 (2009). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Prakash, C. & Clouse, R. E. Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease.


_Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol._ 3, 329–334 (2005). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sweis, R., Fox, M., Anggiansah, A. & Wong, T. Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in


patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 23, 419–426 (2011). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wiener, G. J., Richter, J. E.,


Copper, J. B., Wu, W. C. & Castell, D. O. The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. _Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 83, 358–361 (1988).


CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Weusten, B. L., Roelofs, J. M., Akkermans, L. M., Berge-Henegouwen, G. P. & Smout, A. J. The symptom-association probability: an improved method for


symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. _Gastroenterology_ 107, 1741–1745 (1994). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Silny, J. Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for


measurement of gastrointestinal motility. _J. Gastrointest. Mot._ 3, 151–162 (1991). Google Scholar  * Sifrim, D. _ et al_. Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal


reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings. _Gastroenterology_ 120, 1588–1598 (2001). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bredenoord, A. J., Weusten, B. L., Curvers, W. L.,


Timmer, R. & Smout, A. J. Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation. _Gut_ 55, 313–318 (2005). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hemmink, G. J. _ et al_. Esophageal pH-impedance


monitoring in patients with therapy-resistant reflux symptoms: 'on' or 'off' proton pump inhibitor? _Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 103, 2446–2453 (2008). PubMed  Google Scholar


  * Bredenoord, A. J., Weusten, B. L., Sifrim, D., Timmer, R. & Smout, A. J. Aerophagia, gastric, and supragastric belching: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring.


_Gut_ 53, 1561–1565 (2004). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hemmink, G. J. _ et al_. Speech therapy in patients with excessive supragastric belching—a pilot study.


_Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 22, 24–28 (2009). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gregersen, H. & Andersen, M. B. Impedance measuring system for quantification of cross-sectional area in the


gastrointestinal tract. _Med. Biol. Eng. Comput._ 29, 108–110 (1991). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * McMahon, B. P. _ et al_. Distensibility testing of the esophagus. _Ann. NY Acad. Sci._


1232, 331–40 (2011). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kwiatek, M. A., Pandolfino, J. E., Hirano, I. & Kahrilas, P. J. Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic


functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). _Gastrointest. Endosc._ 72, 272–278 (2010). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * de Ruigh, A. _ et al_. EGJ distensibility as a measure of


treatment outcome in achalasia [abstract]. _Gastroenterology_ 142 (Suppl. 1), S95–S96 (2012). Google Scholar  * Kwiatek, M. A. _ et al_. Mechanical properties of the esophagus in


eosinophilic esophagitis. _Gastroenterology_ 140, 82–90 (2011). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Nasr, I., Attaluri, A., Hashmi, S., Gregersen, H. & Rao, S. S. Investigation of esophageal


sensation and biomechanical properties in functional chest pain. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 22, 520–526 (2010). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Perretta, S., Dallemagne, B.,


McMahon, B., D'Agostino, J. & Marescaux, J. Video. Improving functional esophageal surgery with a “smart” bougie: Endoflip. _Surg. Endosc._ 25, 3109 (2011). PubMed  Google Scholar


  * Pehlivanov, N., Liu, J., Kassab, G. S., Puckett, J. L. & Mittal, R. K. Relationship between esophageal muscle thickness and intraluminal pressure: an ultrasonographic study. _Am. J.


Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol._ 280, G1093–G1098 (2001). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mittal, R. K. Measuring esophageal distention by high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound probe.


_Am. J. Med._ 115 (Suppl. 3A), 130S–136S (2003). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Iascone, C., Di, G. E., Maffi, C. & Ruperto, M. Use of radioisotopic esophageal transit in the assessment of


patients with symptoms of reflux and non-specific esophageal motor disorders. _Dis. Esophagus_ 17, 218–222 (2004). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fass, J. _ et al_. Measuring esophageal


motility with a new intraluminal impedance device. First clinical results in reflux patients. _Scand. J. Gastroenterol._ 29, 693–702 (1994). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tutuian, R. &


Castell, D. O. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. _Clin. Gastroenterol.


Hepatol._ 2, 230–236 (2004). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tutuian, R. & Castell, D. O. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function


abnormalities: study in 350 patients. _Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 99, 1011–1019 (2004). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tucker, E., Knowles, K., Wright, J. & Fox, M. R. Rumination variations:


aetiology and classification of abnormal behavioural responses to digestive symptoms based on high-resolution manometry studies. _Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther._ 37, 263–274 (2013). CAS  PubMed 


Google Scholar  * Bredenoord, A. J. & Smout, A. J. Physiologic and pathologic belching. _Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol._ 5, 772–775 (2007). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Collins, P. J.,


Horowitz, M., Cook, D. J., Harding, P. E. & Shearman, D. J. Gastric emptying in normal subjects—a reproducible technique using a single scintillation camera and computer system. _Gut_


24, 1117–1125 (1983). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Olausson, E. A. _ et al_. Measurement of gastric emptying by radiopaque markers in patients with diabetes: correlation


with scintigraphy and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 25, e224–e232 (2013). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mariani, G. _ et al_. Radionuclide gastroesophageal


motor studies. _J. Nucl. Med._ 45, 1004–1028 (2004). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kelly, K. A. Gastric emptying of liquids and solids: roles of proximal and distal stomach. _Am. J. Physiol._


239, G71–G76 (1980). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bharucha, A. E., Camilleri, M., Veil, E., Burton, D. & Zinsmeister, A. R. Comprehensive assessment of gastric emptying with a stable


isotope breath test. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 25, e60–e69 (2013). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chew, C. G., Bartholomeusz, F. D., Bellon, M. & Chatterton, B. E. Simultaneous


13C/14C dual isotope breath test measurement of gastric emptying of solid and liquid in normal subjects and patients: comparison with scintigraphy. _Nucl. Med. Rev. Cent. East. Eur._ 6,


29–33 (2003). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ghoos, Y. F. _ et al_. Measurement of gastric emptying rate of solids by means of a carbon-labeled octanoic acid breath test. _Gastroenterology_ 104,


1640–1647 (1993). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Saad, R. J. & Hasler, W. L. A technical review and clinical assessment of the wireless motility capsule. _Gastroenterol. Hepatol._ 7,


795–804 (2011). Google Scholar  * Kuo, B. _ et al_. Comparison of gastric emptying of a nondigestible capsule to a radio-labelled meal in healthy and gastroparetic subjects. _Aliment.


Pharmacol. Ther._ 27, 186–196 (2008). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sarosiek, I. _ et al_. The assessment of regional gut transit times in healthy controls and patients with gastroparesis


using wireless motility technology. _Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther._ 31, 313–322 (2010). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Minderhoud, I. M., Mundt, M. W., Roelofs, J. M. & Samsom, M. Gastric


emptying of a solid meal starts during meal ingestion: combined study using 13C-octanoic acid breath test and Doppler ultrasonography. Absence of a lag phase in 13C-octanoic acid breath


test. _Digestion_ 70, 55–60 (2004). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mundt, M. W., Hausken, T., Smout, A. J. & Samsom, M. Relationships between gastric accommodation and gastrointestinal


sensations in healthy volunteers. A study using the barostat technique and two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography. _Dig. Dis. Sci._ 50, 1654–1660 (2005). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Stevens, J. E. _ et al_. Measurement of gastric emptying of a high-nutrient liquid by 3D ultrasonography in diabetic gastroparesis. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 23, 220–224 (2011). CAS 


PubMed  Google Scholar  * Azpiroz, F. & Malagelada, J. R. Gastric tone measured by an electronic barostat in health and postsurgical gastroparesis. _Gastroenterology_ 92, 934–943 (1987).


CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ang, D. Measurement of gastric accommodation: a reappraisal of conventional and emerging modalities. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 23, 287–291 (2011). CAS 


PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kuiken, S. D. _ et al_. Development of a test to measure gastric accommodation in humans. _Am. J. Physiol._ 277, G1217–G1221 (1999). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Bouras, E. P. _ et al_. SPECT imaging of the stomach: comparison with barostat, and effects of sex, age, body mass index, and fundoplication. _Gut_ 51, 781–786 (2002). CAS  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Feinle, C., Kunz, P., Boesiger, P., Fried, M. & Schwizer, W. Scintigraphic validation of a magnetic resonance imaging method to study gastric emptying of a


solid meal in humans. _Gut_ 44, 106–111 (1999). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Sha, W., Pasricha, P. J. & Chen, J. D. Correlations among electrogastrogram, gastric


dysmotility, and duodenal dysmotility in patients with functional dyspepsia. _J. Clin. Gastroenterol._ 43, 716–722 (2009). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Smout A. J, van der Schee, E. J. &


Grashuis, J. L. What is measured in electrogastrography? _Dig. Dis. Sci._ 25, 179–187 (1980). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Parkman, H. P. & Jones, M. P. Tests of gastric neuromuscular


function. _Gastroenterology_ 136, 1526–1543 (2009). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Camilleri, M. Study of human gastroduodenojejunal motility. Applied physiology in clinical practice. _Dig. Dis.


Sci._ 38, 785–794 (1993). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Stanghellini, V. _ et al_. Clinical use of manometry for the diagnosis of intestinal motor abnormalities. _Dig. Liver Dis._ 32,


532–541 (2000). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lindberg, G. _ et al_. Full-thickness biopsy findings in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and enteric dysmotility. _Gut_ 58, 1084–1090


(2009). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hinton, J. M., Lennard-Jones, J. E. & Young, A. C. A new method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers. _Gut_ 10, 842–847 (1969).


CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Metcalf, A. M. _ et al_. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. _Gastroenterology_ 92, 40–47 (1987). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar


  * Rao, S. S. _ et al_. Evaluation of gastrointestinal transit in clinical practice: position paper of the American and European Neurogastroenterology and Motility Societies.


_Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 23, 8–23 (2011). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tran, K., Brun, R. & Kuo, B. Evaluation of regional and whole gut motility using the wireless motility


capsule: relevance in clinical practice. _Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol._ 5, 249–260 (2012). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Brun, R. _ et al_. Comparative analysis of phase III


migrating motor complexes in stomach and small bowel using wireless motility capsule and antroduodenal manometry. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 24, 332–e165 (2012). CAS  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Vilarino, F. _ et al_. Intestinal motility assessment with video capsule endoscopy: automatic annotation of phasic intestinal contractions. _IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging_ 29, 246–259


(2010). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Miller, M. A. _ et al_. Comparison of scintigraphy and lactulose breath hydrogen test for assessment of orocecal transit: lactulose accelerates small bowel


transit. _Dig. Dis. Sci._ 42, 10–18 (1997). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yu, D., Cheeseman, F. & Vanner, S. Combined oro-caecal scintigraphy and lactulose hydrogen breath testing


demonstrate that breath testing detects oro-caecal transit, not small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with IBS. _Gut_ 60, 334–340 (2011). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Argenyi, E.


E., Soffer, E. E., Madsen, M. T., Berbaum, K. S. & Walkner, W. O. Scintigraphic evaluation of small bowel transit in healthy subjects: inter- and intrasubject variability. _Am. J.


Gastroenterol._ 90, 938–942 (1995). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bharucha, A. E., Wald, A., Enck, P. & Rao, S. Functional anorectal disorders. _Gastroenterology_ 130, 1510–1518 (2006).


PubMed  Google Scholar  * Rao, S. S. _ et al_. Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. _Neurogastroenterol. Motil._ 14, 553–559 (2002). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Minguez, M. _ et


al_. Predictive value of the balloon expulsion test for excluding the diagnosis of pelvic floor dyssynergia in constipation. _Gastroenterology_ 126, 57–62 (2004). PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Ratuapli, S. K., Bharucha, A. E., Noelting, J., Harvey, D. M. & Zinsmeister, A. R. Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution


anorectal manometry. _Gastroenterology_ http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.049. * Noelting, J. _ et al_. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women:


effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. _Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 107, 1530–1536 (2012). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wald, A., Caruana, B. J., Freimanis, M. G.,


Bauman, D. H. & Hinds, J. P. Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty. _Dig. Dis. Sci._ 35,


481–487 (1990). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Shorvon, P. J., McHugh, S., Diamant, N. E., Somers, S. & Stevenson, G. W. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.


_Gut_ 30, 1737–1749 (1989). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Fletcher, J. G. _ et al_. Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in


defecatory disorders. _Am. J. Gastroenterol._ 98, 399–411 (2003). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bharucha, A. E. & Fletcher, J. G. Recent advances in assessing anorectal structure and


functions. _Gastroenterology_ 133, 1069–1074 (2007). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gurland, B. & Hull, T. Transrectal ultrasound, manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal latency studies in


the evaluation of sphincter injuries. _Clin. Colon Rectal Surg._ 21, 157–166 (2008). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Behar, J. _ et al_. Functional gallbladder and sphincter of


oddi disorders. _Gastroenterology_ 130, 1498–1509 (2006). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Imler, T. D. _ et al_. Low yield of significant findings on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography


in patients with pancreatobiliary pain and no objective findings. _Dig. Dis. Sci._ 57, 3252–3257 (2012). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Cotton, P. B., Garrow, D. A., Gallagher, J. &


Romagnuolo, J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. _Gastrointest. Endosc._ 70, 80–88 (2009). PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Craig, A. G. _ et al_. Scintigraphy versus manometry in patients with suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. _Gut_ 52, 352–357 (2003). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 


* Delgado-Aros, S., Cremonini, F., Bredenoord, A. J. & Camilleri, M. Does gall-bladder ejection fraction on cholecystokinin cholescintigraphy predict outcome after cholecystectomy in


suspected functional biliary pain? _Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther._ 18, 167–174 (2003). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Barish, M. A., Yucel, E. K. & Ferrucci, J. T. Magnetic resonance


cholangiopancreatography. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 341, 258–264 (1999). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of


Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1100 DE, the Netherlands Albert J. Bredenoord & André J. P. M. Smout Authors * Albert J. Bredenoord


View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * André J. P. M. Smout View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google


Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS The authors contributed equally to all aspects of this article. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to André J. P. M. Smout. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS A.


J. Bredenoord has received research funding from Shire–Movetis NV and Endostim and received payment from MMS International for development of educational presentations. A. J. P. M. Smout has


received sponsorship from Shire–Movetis NV, MMS international and Given Imaging for an educational meeting on motility testing. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS


ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Bredenoord, A., Smout, A. Advances in motility testing—current and novel approaches. _Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol_ 10, 463–472 (2013).


https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.80 Download citation * Published: 07 May 2013 * Issue Date: August 2013 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.80 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you


share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the


Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative