Gas-phase purification enables accurate, multiplexed proteome quantification with isobaric tagging

Gas-phase purification enables accurate, multiplexed proteome quantification with isobaric tagging


Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT We describe a mass spectrometry method, QuantMode, which improves accuracy of isobaric tag–based quantification by alleviating the pervasive problem of precursor interference,


simultaneous isolation and fragmentation of impurities, through gas-phase purification. QuantMode analysis of a yeast sample 'contaminated' with interfering human peptides showed


substantially improved quantitative accuracy compared to a standard scan, with a small loss of spectral identifications. This technique enables large-scale, multiplexed quantitative


proteomics using isobaric tagging. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your


institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per year only $21.58 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access


to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read


our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ULTRA-FAST LABEL-FREE QUANTIFICATION AND COMPREHENSIVE PROTEOME COVERAGE WITH NARROW-WINDOW DATA-INDEPENDENT


ACQUISITION Article Open access 01 February 2024 QUANTITATIVE SHOTGUN PROTEOME ANALYSIS BY DIRECT INFUSION Article 23 November 2020 INCREASING THE THROUGHPUT OF SENSITIVE PROTEOMICS BY


PLEXDIA Article 14 July 2022 REFERENCES * de Godoy, L.M.F. et al. _Nature_ 455, 1251–1254 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ong, S.E. & Mann, M. _Nat. Chem. Biol._ 1, 252–262


(2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Jiang, H. & English, A.M. _J. Proteome Res._ 1, 345–350 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ong, S.E. et al. _Mol. Cell. Proteomics_ 1,


376–386 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Olsen, J.V. et al. _Sci. Signal._ 3, ra3 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Thompson, A. et al. _Anal. Chem._ 75, 1895–1904 (2003). Article 


CAS  Google Scholar  * Ross, P.L. et al. _Mol. Cell. Proteomics_ 3, 1154–1169 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Choe, L. et al. _Proteomics_ 7, 3651–3660 (2007). Article  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Dayon, L. et al. _Anal. Chem._ 80, 2921–2931 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lu, R. et al. _Nature_ 462, 358–362 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ow, S.Y. et al.


_J. Proteome Res._ 8, 5347–5355 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wenger, C.D., Phanstiel, D.H., Lee, M.V., Bailey, D.J. & Coon, J.J. _Proteomics_ 11, 1064–1074 (2011). Article 


CAS  Google Scholar  * Reid, G.E., Shang, H., Hogan, J.M., Lee, G.U. & McLuckey, S.A. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 124, 7353–7362 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Liang, X. & McLuckey,


S.A. _J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom._ 18, 882–890 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * McAlister, G.C., Phanstiel, D.H., Brumbaugh, J., Westphall, M.S. & Coon, J.J. _Mol. Cell.


Proteomics_ 10, 009456 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Ludwig, T.E. et al. _Nat. Methods_ 3, 637–646 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lee, M.V. et al. _Mol. Syst. Biol._ 7, 514


(2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Martin, S.E., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D.F. & Marto, J.A. _Anal. Chem._ 72, 4266–4274 (2000). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Geer, L.Y. et al. _J.


Proteome Res._ 3, 958–964 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Elias, J.E. & Gygi, S.P. _Nat. Methods_ 4, 207–214 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cherry, J.M. et al. _Nucleic


Acids Res._ 26, 73–79 (1998). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kersey, P.J. et al. _Proteomics_ 4, 1985–1988 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We


thank A.J. Bureta for figure illustrations, A. Williams for proofreading, A. Ledvina and D. Bailey for assistance with instrument firmware code modifications, S. Hubler for theoretical


calculations regarding yeast and human peptides, J. Brumbaugh and J. Thomson for culturing the human cells, and J. Syka, J. Schwartz, V. Zabrouskov, J. Griep-Raming and D. Nolting for


helpful discussions. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grant R01 GM080148 to J.J.C. D.H.P. acknowledges support from an National Institutes of Health Genomic


Sciences Training Program (5T32HG002760). AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Craig D Wenger, M


Violet Lee, Graeme C McAlister, Douglas H Phanstiel & Joshua J Coon * Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA M Violet Lee, Alexander S


Hebert, Michael S Westphall & Joshua J Coon * Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Alexander S Hebert & Joshua J Coon


Authors * Craig D Wenger View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * M Violet Lee View author publications You can also search for this author


inPubMed Google Scholar * Alexander S Hebert View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Graeme C McAlister View author publications You can also


search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Douglas H Phanstiel View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Michael S Westphall View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Joshua J Coon View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS


C.D.W. designed and performed research, and wrote the paper; M.V.L., A.S.H. and G.C.M. designed and performed research; D.H.P. designed research; M.S.W. and J.J.C. designed research and


wrote the paper. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Joshua J Coon. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS Two patent applications, in part related to this manuscript, are pending: US


13/086638 (C.D.W., D.H.P. and J.J.C. are the inventors) and US 61/471461 (J.J.C. and M.S.W. are the inventors). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT AND FIGURES Supplementary Figures


1–9, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Note, Supplementary Protocol (PDF 1940 kb) RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Wenger, C., Lee,


M., Hebert, A. _et al._ Gas-phase purification enables accurate, multiplexed proteome quantification with isobaric tagging. _Nat Methods_ 8, 933–935 (2011).


https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1716 Download citation * Received: 17 March 2011 * Accepted: 19 August 2011 * Published: 02 October 2011 * Issue Date: November 2011 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1716 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently


available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative