Factors underlying superior hypertension control in the us
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
Wang YR _ et al_. (2007) Outpatient hypertension treatment, treatment intensification, and control in Western Europe and the United States. _Arch Intern Med_ 167: 141–147 Guidelines for the
treatment of hypertension are more aggressive in the US than elsewhere. To determine whether differences in guidelines translate into differences in clinical variables, Wang _ et al_.
analyzed data for the year 2004 from CardioMonitor—an ongoing, nationally representative survey of physician visits made by patients with cardiovascular diseases. The data set included
21,053 adults with hypertension who had visited 1,284 primary care physicians and 291 cardiologists in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK or the US. A minimum of 92% of patients received
drug treatment for hypertension in each country. Average pretreatment blood pressure was lower in the US than in the European countries (161/94 mmHg vs 167–173/96–99 mmHg), while concomitant
use of antihypertensive drugs from two or more classes was more common in the US (64% vs 44–59% of patients). The authors defined 'controlled hypertension' as a most-recent blood
pressure reading of less than 140/90 mmHg. Multivariate analyses showed that hypertension was less likely to be controlled in the European countries (odds ratios 0.27–0.50; _P_ <0.001 for
all). The likelihood of a dose escalation or medication change in response to inadequately controlled hypertension was also lower in Europe (odds ratios 0.29–0.65; _P_ <0.001 for all).
The better rates of hypertension control in the US seem, therefore, to be attributable to lower thresholds for initiating treatment, and more-intensive drug regimens. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS
Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Factors underlying superior hypertension control in the US. _Nat Rev Cardiol_ 4, 297 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0871 Download citation * Issue Date: June 2007 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0871 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will
be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt
content-sharing initiative