
Comparison of children's body fatness between two contrasting income groups: contribution of height difference
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
To compare measures of growth and body fatness (body mass index (BMI) and % body fat) in children from two contrasting income backgrounds and to examine the contribution of height difference
to these measures.
Schools in inner East London (‘low income’) and West London, Hertfordshire and Cambridgeshire (‘high income’), UK.
Height, weight, BMI (weight per height2) and percentage body fat (%BF, by bioelectrical impedance analysis).
Children from the ‘lower income’ background were significantly shorter, heavier and fatter (%BF) with a higher BMI for their age compared with those from a ‘higher income’ background.
Prevalence of overweight/obesity was greater in the ‘lower income’ group children, assessed on the basis of BMI, and this income group difference was magnified when based on %BF
(overfat/obese). Irrespective of the assessment tool used, overweight/overfat/obese children as a group were significantly taller for their age compared with children categorized as normal
weight/normal fat. Despite the overfat/obese children being taller for their age, an ‘income group’ difference in height remained within this category.
These findings confirm the income group influence on obesity prevalence. They also illustrate that BMI underestimates the true number of children having excess body fat, particularly in ‘low
income’ children. Exactly why BMI seems to function differently along income group divisions in unclear, but a shorter height-for-age of the ‘lower income’ group children could be one
explanation. These findings raise important questions about the causes and consequences of obesity in children from ‘lower income’ backgrounds.
This study was supported by funding from the North Central London Research Consortium (NoCLoR) and the Learning Trust. Tanita UK Ltd provided funding for the development of the UK body fat
reference curves for children.
Institute for Health Research & Policy, London Metropolitan University, London, UK
HDMc has previously received funding from Tanita UK Ltd., as indicated in the acknowledgements.
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: