Correlation of upper air variables

ABSTRACT I DO not see that Prof. Mahalanobis (NATURE, September 1, p. 323) has given any good reason for the statement that the correlation coefficients that I have obtained from the English

balloon ascents are to be taken as the upper limit of what is possible, excepting that Capt. Douglas working on a different system in one specific instance has obtained a lower value. I

freely admit they may be wrong; unless one has a very large sample one always has to reckon with the casual error of a correlation coefficient, but there seems no reason why I should not

equally well accept Dr. Chapman's conclusion that they are too low. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS REGRESSION-BASED GAP-FILLING METHODS SHOW AIR TEMPERATURE REDUCTIONS AND WIND

PATTERN CHANGES DURING THE 2019 TOTAL ECLIPSE IN CHILE Article Open access 11 May 2022 THE GLOBAL HISTORICAL CLIMATE DATABASE HCLIM Article Open access 19 January 2023 TIME-SCALE DEPENDENCE

OF SOLAR WIND-BASED REGRESSION MODELS OF IONOSPHERIC ELECTRODYNAMICS Article Open access 02 October 2020 ARTICLE PDF AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Benson, Wallingford, Berks.

W. H. DINES Authors * W. H. DINES View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

CITE THIS ARTICLE DINES, W. Correlation of Upper Air Variables. _Nature_ 112, 502 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1038/112502a0 Download citation * Issue Date: 06 October 1923 * DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/112502a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently

available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative