Democrats Can Have Ginormous Spending Gaps Too

Democrats Can Have Ginormous Spending Gaps Too


Play all audios:

Loading...

The big news from Tuesday, rightly, is that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker cruised to victory in his recall election with help from a handful of out-of-state billionaires. Walker raised $30


million; his challenger, Democrat Tom Barrett, raised $3.9 million. Money doesn’t buy elections, but it definitely makes them a lot easier to win—otherwise there’d be no point in giving.


But the recall wasn’t the only election on Tuesday and it wasn’t the only race in which a massive spending gap tipped the scales. As MoJo alum Mike Beckel noted at iWatch News, Democrats


spent big bucks to take down an independent candidate in a California primary. In the 26th district, Democrat Julie Brownley squeaked past independent Linda Parks for the second spot on the


ballot in November:


Records show four outside groups, including two super PACs, have collectively spent more than $1 million on independent expenditures to help Brownley.


The two pro-Brownley super PACs in the race are the “House Majority PAC,” whose primary purpose is to “win back the House majority for Democrats,” and “Women Vote,” a project of EMILY’s


List, which works to elect Democratic women supportive of abortion rights.


By contrast, the only outside group supporting Parks, centrist super-PAC icPurple, spent just $52,000—a roughly 20 to 1 gap. For Democratic donors, it was money well spent. The 26th is a


blue district they’ll need to win in November to have any chance of taking back the House.


Elsewhere in California, Democrats failed to put a candidate on the November ballot in the Democratic-leaning 31st district despite picking up nearly half the vote. That’s because they never


settled on a candidate, splitting their portion of the vote four ways. (In California’s new “jungle primary” system, the top two vote-getters in the primary, regardless of party, appear on


the ballot in November.) Birther dentist Orly Taitz, meanwhile, received 113,000 votes in the US Senate primary, but did not qualify for the November ballot. Maybe next time.


Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.


“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends


to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.


No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes


to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real


difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.


“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends


to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.


No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes


to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real


difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.


Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.


Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


Inexpensive, too! Subscribe today and get a full year of Mother Jones for just $19.95.


Award-winning photojournalism. Stunning video. Fearless conversations.


Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.


We’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth-telling investigations we’re known for don’t happen under corporate ownership. We shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report


the facts other media are afraid to touch.


The essential ingredient that makes this possible? Readers like you. Please stand with Mother Jones and make a donation today. These are dangerous times, and we’ve got a lot of hard,


consequential work to do. But we can’t do it without reader support.


We’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth-telling investigations we’re known for don’t happen under corporate ownership. We shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report


the facts other media are afraid to touch.


The essential ingredient that makes this possible? Readers like you. Please stand with Mother Jones and make a donation today. These are dangerous times, and we’ve got a lot of hard,


consequential work to do. But we can’t do it without reader support.