
Payments are made without work being done: sc on graft in c'wealth games
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
'Newly-constructed bridge collapsed like a pack of cards. There is rampant corruption in the country. We cannot shut our eyes,' a bench comprising justices GS Singhvi and AK
Ganguly said. The Supreme Court today slammed "rampant corruption" in the Commonwealth Games to be held here and castigated the government for the collapse of the foot overbridge
"like a pack of cards" near Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium. "In this country, payments are made without work being done. Newly-constructed bridge collapsed like a pack of cards.
Rs70,000 crores are involved (in the games). There is rampant corruption in the country. We cannot shut our eyes," a bench comprising justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly said. "Till
October 15, Commonwealth is a public purpose - thereafter, everything will become private purpose," said the bench expressing anguish over the collapse of the pedestrian bridge near
the Nehru Stadium, main venue of the Games, earlier this month, just days after it was completed. The bench made the remarks during the hearing of a matter in which it was alleged that NDMC
constructed a high-rise building near the protected monument Jantar Mantar. Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has alleged the building of NDMC (New Delhi Municipal Corporation) was built
by ignoring law which prohibits such construction within 100 meters of the monument. During the hearing, it was also pointed out that other buildings have also been allowed to come near
the vicinity of Jantar Mantar. "How mindless and lawless are you? No regard for history, no regard for constitution. There is a totally unethical government with no moral values. Money
is the only thing that matters. Why don't you convert Jantar Mantar into a hotel or a mall and India will shine?" said the bench. The bench was hearing the petition filed by the
ASI in 2006.