Medial preoptic circuit induces hunting-like actions to target objects and prey

Medial preoptic circuit induces hunting-like actions to target objects and prey


Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT As animals forage, they must obtain useful targets by orchestrating appropriate actions that range from searching to chasing, biting and carrying. Here, we reveal that neurons


positive for the α subunit of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKIIα) in the medial preoptic area (MPA) that send projections to the ventral periaqueductal gray (vPAG) mediate these


target-directed actions in mice. During photostimulation of the MPA–vPAG circuit, mice vigorously engaged with 3D objects and chased moving objects. When exposed to a cricket, they hunted


down the prey and bit it to kill. By applying a head-mounted object control with timely photostimulation of the MPA–vPAG circuit, we found that MPA–vPAG circuit-induced actions occurred only


when the target was detected within the binocular visual field. Using this device, we successfully guided mice to navigate specified routes. Our study explains how the brain yields a strong


motivation to acquire a target object along the continuum of hunting behavior. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your


institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel


any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink *


Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional


subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS PERIAQUEDUCTAL GRAY NEURONS ENCODE THE SEQUENTIAL MOTOR PROGRAM IN HUNTING BEHAVIOR OF MICE


Article Open access 11 November 2021 A CIRCUIT FROM THE VENTRAL SUBICULUM TO ANTERIOR HYPOTHALAMIC NUCLEUS GABAERGIC NEURONS ESSENTIAL FOR ANXIETY-LIKE BEHAVIORAL AVOIDANCE Article Open


access 03 December 2022 THE TECTONIGRAL PATHWAY REGULATES APPETITIVE LOCOMOTION IN PREDATORY HUNTING IN MICE Article Open access 20 July 2021 DATA AVAILABILITY The data that support the


findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. CHANGE HISTORY * _ 07 MARCH 2018 In the version of this article initially published, a sentence in


the fifth paragraph of the Results read, “Immunohistochemistry revealed that VGLUT2+ MPA neurons rarely expressed CaMKIIα, which is a putative marker for subcortical glutamatergic neurons.”


It should have read, “Immunohistochemistry revealed that CaMKIIα+ MPA neurons rarely expressed VGLUT2, which is a putative marker for subcortical glutamatergic neurons.” The error has been


corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article. In the supplementary information originally posted online, the wrong version of Supplementary Fig. 1 was posted and some of the


supplementary videos were interchanged. In the corrected Supplementary Fig. 1, the top right subpanel was added and the original Supplementary Fig. 1a was divided into 1a and 1b, with


subsequent panels incremented accordingly. The legend was changed from “A. Schematic illustrating electrical lesioning of the rat anterior hypothalamus. Electrical lesion areas (gray) in


five representative brain sections are depicted. Scale bar, 1 mm” to “A. Repetitive electrical stimulations of the anterior hypothalamus using bipolar electrodes (_Left_) caused a lesion at


the hypothalamic area (_middle_, marked by asterisk) successfully in 7 rats (_Right_, overlapped images of brain sections located from the bregma −0.24 mm). Scale bar, 1 mm. B. Electrical


lesion areas (gray) in five representative brain sections from anterior to posterior are depicted.” The errors have been corrected online. _ REFERENCES * Inglis, I. R., Langton, S., Forkman,


B. & Lazarus, J. An information primacy model of exploratory and foraging behaviour. _Anim. Behav._ 62, 543–557 (2001). Article  Google Scholar  * Dunbar, R. I. Animal play behavior.


_Behav. Process._ 8, 98–101 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(83)90049-9. Article  Google Scholar  * Bateson, P. & Young, M. The influence of male kittens on the object play of


their female siblings. _Behav. Neural Biol._ 27, 374–378 (1979). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ferster, C. B. & Skinner, B. F. _Schedules of Reinforcement_ (B. F. Skinner Foundation,


1957). * Skinner, B. F. Operant behavior. _Am. Psychol._ 18, 503 (1963). Article  Google Scholar  * Klein, M. O. et al. Periaqueductal gray μ and κ opioid receptors determine behavioral


selection from maternal to predatory behavior in lactating rats. _Behav. Brain Res._ 274, 62–72 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Mota-Ortiz, S. R. et al. The periaqueductal gray as a


critical site to mediate reward seeking during predatory hunting. _Behav. Brain Res._ 226, 32–40 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Comoli, E., Ribeiro-Barbosa, E. R. & Canteras, N. S.


Predatory hunting and exposure to a live predator induce opposite patterns of Fos immunoreactivity in the PAG. _Behav. Brain Res._ 138, 17–28 (2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Han, W.


et al. Integrated control of predatory hunting by the central nucleus of the amygdala. _Cell_ 168, 311–324.e318 (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Beitz, A. J. The organization of


afferent projections to the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the rat. _Neuroscience_ 7, 133–159 (1982). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Rizvi, T. A., Ennis, M. & Shipley, M. T. Reciprocal


connections between the medial preoptic area and the midbrain periaqueductal gray in rat: a WGA-HRP and PHA-L study. _J. Comp. Neurol._ 315, 1–15 (1992). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *


Malsbury, C. W. Facilitation of male rat copulatory behavior by electrical stimulation of the medial preoptic area. _Physiol. Behav._ 7, 797–805 (1971). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wu,


Z., Autry, A. E., Bergan, J. F., Watabe-Uchida, M. & Dulac, C. G. Galanin neurons in the medial preoptic area govern parental behaviour. _Nature_ 509, 325–330 (2014). Article  CAS 


Google Scholar  * Silva, B. A. et al. Independent hypothalamic circuits for social and predator fear. _Nat. Neurosci._ 16, 1731–1733 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, L., Chen,


I. Z. & Lin, D. Collateral pathways from the ventromedial hypothalamus mediate defensive behaviors. _Neuron_ 85, 1344–1358 (2015). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lin, D. et al.


Functional identification of an aggression locus in the mouse hypothalamus. _Nature_ 470, 221–226 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Falkner, A. L., Grosenick, L., Davidson, T. J.,


Deisseroth, K. & Lin, D. Hypothalamic control of male aggression-seeking behavior. _Nat. Neurosci._ 19, 596–604 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Falkner, A. L., Dollar, P.,


Perona, P., Anderson, D. J. & Lin, D. Decoding ventromedial hypothalamic neural activity during male mouse aggression. _J. Neurosci._ 34, 5971–5984 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar 


* Aponte, Y., Atasoy, D. & Sternson, S. M. AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training. _Nat. Neurosci._ 14, 351–355 (2011). Article  CAS 


Google Scholar  * Anand, B. K. & Brobeck, J. R. Localization of a “feeding center” in the hypothalamus of the rat. _Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med._ 77, 323–324 (1951). Article  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Davidson, J. M. Activation of the male rat’s sexual behavior by intracerebral implantation of androgen. _Endocrinology_ 79, 783–794 (1966). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lee, H.


et al. Scalable control of mounting and attack by Esr1+ neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus. _Nature_ 509, 627–632 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wallace, R. J. Hoarding of


inedible objects by albino rats. _Behav. Biol._ 23, 409–414 (1978). Article  Google Scholar  * Wallace, R. J. Novelty and partibility as determinants of hoarding in the albino rat. _Anim.


Learn. Behav._ 7, 549–554 (1979). Article  Google Scholar  * Morgan, J. I., Cohen, D. R., Hempstead, J. L. & Curran, T. Mapping patterns of c-fos expression in the central nervous system


after seizure. _Science_ 237, 192–197 (1987). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kim, D., Chae, S., Lee, J., Yang, H. & Shin, H. S. Variations in the behaviors to novel objects among five


inbred strains of mice. _Genes. Brain Behav._ 4, 302–306 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhang, F., Wang, L. P., Boyden, E. S. & Deisseroth, K. Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical


control of excitable cells. _Nat. Methods_ 3, 785–792 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Vong, L. et al. Leptin action on GABAergic neurons prevents obesity and reduces inhibitory tone


to POMC neurons. _Neuron_ 71, 142–154 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Fremeau, R. T. Jr. et al. The expression of vesicular glutamate transporters defines two classes of excitatory


synapse. _Neuron_ 31, 247–260 (2001). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Gorski, R. A., Harlan, R. E., Jacobson, C. D., Shryne, J. E. & Southam, A. M. Evidence for the existence of a


sexually dimorphic nucleus in the preoptic area of the rat. _J. Comp. Neurol._ 193, 529–539 (1980). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Raisman, G. & Field, P. M. Sexual dimorphism in the


preoptic area of the rat. _Science_ 173, 731–733 (1971). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Gunaydin, L. A. et al. Natural neural projection dynamics underlying social behavior. _Cell_ 157,


1535–1551 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Heesy, C. P. On the relationship between orbit orientation and binocular visual field overlap in mammals. _Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell.


Evol. Biol._ 281, 1104–1110 (2004). Article  Google Scholar  * Numan, M. Medial preoptic area and maternal behavior in the female rat. _J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol._ 87, 746–759 (1974).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chung, S. et al. Identification of preoptic sleep neurons using retrograde labelling and gene profiling. _Nature_ 545, 477–481 (2017). Article  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Ziegler, D. R., Cullinan, W. E. & Herman, J. P. Distribution of vesicular glutamate transporter mRNA in rat hypothalamus. _J. Comp. Neurol._ 448, 217–229 (2002). Article  CAS


  Google Scholar  * Kiss, J., Kocsis, K., Csáki, A. & Halász, B. Evidence for vesicular glutamate transporter synapses onto gonadotropin-releasing hormone and other neurons in the rat


medial preoptic area. _Eur. J. Neurosci._ 18, 3267–3278 (2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Oka, T., Tsumori, T., Yokota, S. & Yasui, Y. Neuroanatomical and neurochemical


organization of projections from the central amygdaloid nucleus to the nucleus retroambiguus via the periaqueductal gray in the rat. _Neurosci. Res._ 62, 286–298 (2008). Article  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Wilson, A. M. et al. Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs. _Nature_ 498, 185–189 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Paul, L. Predatory attack by rats: its


relationship to feeding and type of prey. _J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol._ 78, 69–76 (1972). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Valone, T. J. & Lima, S. L. Carrying food items to cover for


consumption: the behavior of ten bird species feeding under the risk of predation. _Oecologia_ 71, 286–294 (1987). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Talwar, S. K. et al. Rat navigation guided


by remote control. _Nature_ 417, 37–38 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Maharbiz, M. & Sato, H. Cyborg beetles. _Sci. Am._ 303, 94–99 (2010). * O’Connell, L. A. & Hofmann, H.


A. Evolution of a vertebrate social decision-making network. _Science_ 336, 1154–1157 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Mueller, A. et al. Pathologisches Kaufen und psychische Komorbidität


[Compulsive buying and psychiatric comorbidity]. _Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol._ 59, 291–299 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Grant, J. E. & Kim, S. W. Clinical characteristics


and associated psychopathology of 22 patients with kleptomania. _Compr. Psychiatr_ 43, 378–384, https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2002.34628 (2002).. * Saxena, S. et al. Obsessive-compulsive


hoarding: symptom severity and response to multimodal treatment. _J. Clin. Psychiatry_ 63, 21–27 (2002). Article  Google Scholar  * Gray, P. The decline of play and the rise of


psychopathology in children and adolescents. _Am. J. Play._ 3, 443–463 (2011). Google Scholar  * Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K.B.J. _The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates_ (Elsevier


Academic Press, 2008) * Piché, M., Robert, S., Miceli, D. & Bronchti, G. Environmental enrichment enhances auditory takeover of the occipital cortex in anophthalmic mice. _Eur. J.


Neurosci._ 20, 3463–3472 (2004). Article  Google Scholar  * Mendonça, D. F. et al. The inactive form of glycogen synthase kinase-3β is associated with the development of carcinomas in


galectin-3 wild-type mice, but not in galectin-3-deficient mice. _Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol._ 5, 547–554 (2012). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Cook-Snyder, D. R., Jones, A. &


Reijmers, L. G. A retrograde adeno-associated virus for collecting ribosome-bound mRNA from anatomically defined projection neurons. _Front. Mol. Neurosci._ 8, 56 (2015). Article  Google


Scholar  * Morrison, H. W. & Filosa, J. A. Sex differences in astrocyte and microglia responses immediately following middle cerebral artery occlusion in adult mice. _Neuroscience_ 339,


85–99 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Musser, M. A., Correa, H. & Southard-Smith, E. M. Enteric neuron imbalance and proximal dysmotility in ganglionated intestine of the


Sox10Dom/+ Hirschsprung mouse model. _Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol._ 1, 87–101 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Cui, G. et al. Concurrent activation of striatal direct and indirect


pathways during action initiation. _Nature_ 494, 238–242 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kim, J. et al. Inhibitory basal ganglia inputs induce excitatory motor signals in the


thalamus. _Neuron_ 95, 1181–1196. e1188 (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank K. Deisseroth at Stanford University for generously sharing the


channelrhodopsin vectors and Y-S. Jeong, J-E. Choi and M-K. Han for their assistance with experiments. We also thank to S. Park for assistance with writing. This work was supported by


Samsung Science and Technology Foundation under Project Number SSTF-BA1301-07. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Sae-Geun Park, Yong-Cheol Jeong and


Dae-Gun Kim. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Biological Sciences, KAIST, Daejeon, Korea Sae-Geun Park, Yong-Cheol Jeong, Dae-Gun Kim, Min-Hyung Lee, Anna Shin, Geunhong Park, Jia


Ryoo, Jiso Hong, Seohui Bae & Daesoo Kim * Department of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Korea Dae-Gun Kim, Cheol-Hu Kim & Phill-Seung Lee Authors * Sae-Geun Park View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yong-Cheol Jeong View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Dae-Gun


Kim View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Min-Hyung Lee View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar


* Anna Shin View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Geunhong Park View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google


Scholar * Jia Ryoo View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jiso Hong View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed 


Google Scholar * Seohui Bae View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Cheol-Hu Kim View author publications You can also search for this author


inPubMed Google Scholar * Phill-Seung Lee View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Daesoo Kim View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS D.K. and P.-S.L. designed the study and coordinated the experiments. S.-G.P., Y.-C.J., G.P. and S.B. performed the behavioral experiments


with optogenetics. D.-G.K., C.-H.K., P-S.L. and Y.-C.J. developed the head-mounted device, MIDAS algorithm and navigation platform. Y.-C.J. and A.S. performed the electrophysiological


experiments. M.-H.L., J.R. and J.H. performed the histological experiments and analysis. All authors participated in writing the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to


Phill-Seung Lee or Daesoo Kim. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains


neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. INTEGRATED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1 ELECTRICAL LESIONS OF THE ANTERIOR


HYPOTHALAMUS ABOLISH OBJECT-HOARDING BEHAVIOR IN LONG EVANS RATS. a. Schematic illustrating electrical lesioning of the rat anterior hypothalamus. Electrical lesion areas (gray) in five


representative brain sections are depicted. Scale bar, 1 mm. b. Schematic depiction of the hoarding behavior experimental protocol. c. Latency to hoard in sham and lesion groups. The lesion


group showed a significant object hoarding delay (Sham, _n_ = 8 rats, Lesion, _n_ = 7 rats; Mann Whitney U test, _P_ = 0.021). d. Total play-like object engagement was significantly reduced


in the lesion group (Sham, _n_ = 8 rats, Lesion, _n_ = 7 rats; Unpaired t-test, _P_ = 0.49). Bar graphs indicate mean (bars) ± SEM (error bars) and individual data (circles). See the


detailed statistical values in Supplementary table 1. * _P_ < 0.05 SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF CFOS ACTIVITY IN HYPOTHALAMIC NUCLEI UPON OBJECT EXPOSURE. A.


Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC, stained with DAB) images of cFos expression in the MPA. Scale bars, 200 µm. B. Magnified images (control, _n_ = 8 mice; object; _n_ = 7 mice). Scale


bars, 50 µm. C. Representative images from other hypothalamic regions (control, _n_ = 8 mice; object, _n_ = 7 mice). Scale bars, 100 µm. Abbreviations: LPO, lateral preoptic area; VLPO,


ventrolateral preoptic nucleus; vBNST, ventral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; SHy, septohypothalamic nucleus; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; VMH, ventromedial hypothalamus; Arc, arcuate


nucleus; aca, anterior commissure (anterior part). See Figure 1b for the quantitative data SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 3 VALIDATION OF VIRALLY MEDIATED EXPRESSION OF CHR2 IN VGLUT2::CHR2MPA-VPAG


AND VGAT::CHR2MPA-VPAG MICE. A. _Top_, Schematic depiction of VGLUT2+ MPA-vPAG circuit photostimulation of _VGLUT2_-ires-_Cre_ mice. Bottom, Representative images of virally mediated ChR2


expression in the MPA and its termini in vPAG. 5 mice were used for these images. B. _Top_, Schematic illustration of photostimulation in _VGAT_-ires-_Cre_ mice. _Bottom_, Representative


images of ChR2 expression in MPA and vPAG of _VGAT_-ires-_Cre_ mice. 5 mice were used for these images. Scale bars, 200 µm SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 4 APPROPRIATE EXPRESSION OF CHR2 IN THE MPA


AND THE EFFECTIVE LOCATION OF FIBER OPTIC FIBER IN THE PAG. A. Representative image of virally mediated ChR2 expression in the MPA and surrounding brain regions. B. Representative image of


an individual mouse brain showing non-specific viral expression leading to reduced MPA-specific expression. Note that this mouse showed no response to objects during photostimulation. C.


Quantification of viral expression in the MPA and surrounding brain regions (_n_ = 17 mice; RM ANOVA on Ranks, MPA vs. LPO, _P_ < 0.05; MPA vs. VLPO, _P_ < 0.05; MPA vs. vBNST, _P_


< 0.05; MPA vs. SHy, _P_ < 0.05). D. Schematic depiction of retrograde tracing from vPAG. Bottom, Representative image of the MPA and surrounding brain regions. Note that labeled


neurons project to the vPAG. E. Representative image of retrograde tracing. 3 mice were used for this image. F. Quantification of labeled neurons in the MPA and surrounding brain regions


(_n_ = 3 mice; One Way RM ANOVA, MPA vs. LPO, _P_ = 0.002; MPA vs. VLPO, _P_ = 0.001; MPA vs. vBNST, _P_ = 0.001; MPA vs. SHy, _P_ = 0.002). G. Locations of the fiber optic cannulas in the


vPAG. The red crosses indicate the optic fiber tip locations in mice that responded to an object (_n_ = 6) during photostimulation of the MPA-vPAG circuit; the black crosses indicate tip


locations in mice that showed no response (_n_ = 3). Scale bars, 200 µm. Bar graphs indicate mean (bars) ± SEM (error bars) and individual data (circles). See the detailed statistical values


in Supplementary table 1. * _P_ < 0.05 SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 5 PHOTOSTIMULATION OF SOMATA AND AXON TERMINI OF CAMKIIΑ+ MPA NEURONS. A. Photostimulation of MPA neuron somata increases


object dislocation by CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA mice (_n_ = 6) more than control eYFPMPA mice (_n_ = 7; Mann Whitney U test, Light on state between two groups, _P_ = 0.008; Wilcoxon Signed Rank test,


ON vs. OFF in ChR2, _P_ = 0.031). B. Female CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice (red lines; _n_ = 4) moved presented objects more during photostimulation than control CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG mice


(gray lines; _n_ = 5; Two Way RM ANOVA, ON state between two groups, _P_ < 0.001; OFF vs. ON in ChR2, _P_ < 0.001; ON vs. OFF in ChR2, _P_ < 0.001). C. Bar graphs comparing object


dislocation during photostimulation of CaMKIIα MPA somata in male mice and of the CaMKIIα MPA-vPAG circuit in male and female mice (_n_ = 7 mice for MPA somata, _n_ = 5 for


CaMKIIα::ChR2MAP-vPAG male mice, _n_ = 4 for CaMKIIα::ChR2MAP-vPAG female mice; One Way ANOVA, MPA somata vs. CaMKIIα::ChR2MAP-vPAG male, _P_ < 0.001; CaMKIIα::ChR2MAP-vPAG male vs.


CaMKIIα::ChR2MAP-vPAG female, _P_ = 0.004). Line graphs represent mean (thick lines) ± SEM (error bars) and individual data (brighter lines). Bar graphs indicate mean (bars) ± SEM (error


bars) and individual data (circles). See the detailed statistical values in Supplementary table 1. * _P_ < 0.05 SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 6 ATTENTION SHIFT TO OBJECTS FROM FEMALES IN THE


CAMKIIΑ::CHR2MPA-VPAG MICE. A. Photostimulation elevates the locomotion of CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG (_n_ = 8) mice but not in CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG (_n_ = 5) mice (Unpaired t-test, _P_ =


0.008). B. Representative behavioral raster plots for the inter-male aggression test. Each behavior is color-coded as indicated. 6 mice were used for this image. C. Percentage of social


exploration and attacks versus non-social exploration behaviors (i.e., searching and digging) during encounters with an intruder male. Note that photostimulation reduced attacks toward the


intruder male and increased non-social exploration. Photostimulation did not alter social exploration behavior (_n_ = 6 for CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice, Paired t-test, social exploration, _P_


= 0.308; attack, _P_ = 0.003; non-social exploration, _P_ = 0.007). Colored-boxes represent percentage of each behaviors. d. Duration of attacks by CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG (_n_ = 6) and


CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG (_n_ = 6) mice (Mann Whitney U test, _P_ = 0.026). E. Number of attacks by CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG (_n_ = 6) and CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG (_n_ = 6) mice (Unpaired t-test,


_P_ = 0.037). F. Percentage of time male CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG (_n_ = 10) and CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG (_n_ = 8) mice (Unpaired t-test, _P_ = 0.00000415) spent searching for females during


photostimulation. Note that, like what we observed in the inter-male aggression tests, CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice spent less time searching because they spent more time in non-social


exploration. g. CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG (_n_ = 6) eat less than CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG (_n_ = 8) mice during photostimulation (Unpaired t-test, _P_ = 0.001). Bar graphs show mean (bars) ± SEM


(error bars) and individual data (circles). See the detailed statistical values in Supplementary table 1. * _P_ < 0.05 SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 7. _IN VIVO_ ACTIVITY OF THE CAMKIIΑ+ MPA–VPAG


CIRCUIT MEASURED BY PHOTOMETRY. A. The expression of GCAMP6m that mediated by viral infection of AAV9-CAG-DIO-GCaMP6m and AAV5-CaMKIIα::-Cre in MPA. 6 mice were used for these images. Scale


bars, 200 µm. B. Representative raw trace of fluorescent activity [\(\Delta F/F=(F-{F}_{mean})/{F}_{mean}\)] during object exploration. C. Success rates, which indicate increase of


fluorescent activity during object exploration, are not different across the bouts. (_n_ = 6 mice; One Way RM ANOVA, _P_ = 0.800) Bar indicate average of population and colored-lines


indicate individuals. D. Peak fluorescent activity of individuals runs down across the bout number. (_n_ = 6 mice) Bar graphs indicate mean (bars) ± SEM (error bars) and individual data


(colored-lines). Dot graphs represent mean (dots) ± SEM (error bars), trend line (green line) and individual data (circles). See the detailed statistical values in Supplementary table 1. *


_P_ < 0.05 SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 8. PHOTOINHIBITION OF THE CAMKIIΑ+ MPA–VPAG CIRCUIT ABOLISHES OBJECT EXPLORATION. A. _Left_, CaMKIIα::eNpHR3.0MPA-vPAG mice (_n_ = 8) move presented


objects less than control CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG mice (_n_ = 5, Two Way RM ANOVA, 5 min, _P_ < 0.01; 10 min _P_ = 0.135; 15 min, _P_ = 0.643; 20 min, _P_ = 0.562). Line graph indicates


mean (lines) ± SEM (error bars). _Right_, Curves for individual mice. b. Total food intake. CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG (_n_ = 5) and CaMKIIα::eNpHR3.0MPA-vPAG (_n_ = 6) mice (Unpaired t-test, _P_


= 0.936) eat similar amounts. Bar graphs represent mean (bars) ± SEM (error bars) and individual data (colored-lines). See the detailed statistical values in Supplementary table 1. * _P_


< 0.05, _n_.s. not significant SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 9 THE HARDWARE CONFIGURATION OF THE MIDAS. A. Photographs of the head-mounted device components and Bluetooth module. Scale bar, 1 cm.


B. Schematic for the overall system. The PC navigation program analyzes positional information for each mouse and for the 3D maze using a CMOS camera. It then transmits control commands to


the head-mounted device via Bluetooth. The controller chipset in the head-mounted device controls the target object servomotor and the LED module. C. The average mouse velocity in response


to photostimulation using different LED-ON angles (_n_ = 5 mice; One Way RM ANOVA, 30° vs. 10°, _P_ = 0.023; 30° vs. 40°, _P_ = 0.039; 30° vs. 70°, _P_ = 0.013). D. The average velocity from


the start to the goal as a function of frequency (_n_ = 3 mice; One Way RM ANOVA, 0 Hz vs. 40 Hz, _P_ < 0.001; 10 Hz vs. 40 Hz, _P_ < 0.001; 15 Hz vs. 40 Hz, _P_ < 0.001; 20 Hz vs.


40 Hz, _P_ = 0.008). Line graphs represent mean (thick lines) ± SEM (error bars) and individual data (brighter lines). See the detailed statistical values in Supplementary table 1. * _P_


< 0.05 SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 10 A COMPLEX MAZE FOR EVALUATING THE CONTROL OF MOUSE BEHAVIOR BY MIDAS. A. The maze consists of seven hurdles: ① a zig-zag course; ② a female distractor; ③


blind alleys; ④ rough terrain; ⑤ a mesh ladder; ⑥ food distractors; and ⑦ a bridge. B. Latency to the goal during a 300-s navigation session. Note that the OC+ LC condition showed


significantly less latency than the other conditions (_n_ = 5 mice; One Way RM ANOVA, OC only vs. OC+LC, _P_ < 0.001; LC only vs. OC+LC, _P_ < 0.001). C. Frequency of getting trapped


in the hurdles, quantified as described in the Methods. Note that mice in the OC+LC condition were trapped in the hurdles significantly less often than mice of the other conditions (_n_ = 5


mice; One Way RM ANOVA, OC only vs. OC+LC, _P_ = 0.009; LC only vs. OC+LC, _P_ = 0.008). Bar graphs indicate mean (bars) ± SEM (error bars) and individual data (circles). See the detailed


statistical values in Supplementary table 1. * _P_ < 0.05 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT AND FIGURES Supplementary Figures 1–10 LIFE SCIENCES REPORTING SUMMARY SUPPLEMENTARY


TABLE 1 VIDEOS SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 1: Time-dependent responses of mice toward objects. A light cube was provided to a B6 mouse. Before habituation, the mouse showed awareness of the light


cube. With time, the mouse began to show active engagement, such as touching, biting and, in the late phase, dislocation. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 2: Photostimulation of the CaMKIIα+ MPA–vPAG


circuit induces strong object explorative behaviors. Photostimulation of the MPA–vPAG circuit (CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG) induced a stronger object exploration compared with that observed in


CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA and CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA-vPAG control mice. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 3: Photostimulation of CaMKIIα+ MPA neurons induces object explorative behaviors. Photostimulation of the MPA led


to increased engagement with the presented object in a mouse transfected with ChR2 in the MPA (CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA) but not one transfected with control virus (CaMKIIα::eYFPMPA). Behavioral


changes were evident between the light-OFF and light-ON states. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 4: In vivo calcium recording of the CaMKIIα+ MPA–vPAG circuit during object exploration. _In vivo_ calcium


recording was conducted in the vPAG to record signals from the axon termini of CaMKIIα+ MPA neurons expressing GCaMP6m. Note. The black bar located on the left side of the movie indicates


ΔF/F in real-time. It turns red when the ΔF/F exceeds 3σ of the session. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 5: Photostimulation of male CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice shifts their attention from a female to a


target object. During the light-OFF state, a male CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mouse (C57BL/6J) spent more time searching for a female (BALB/cJ) than for a presented object. In the light-ON state,


the male began to show more active engagement with the object rather than the female. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 6: Exploratory behaviors for various 3D objects in CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice.


Photostimulation of the CaMKIIα+ MPA–vPAG circuit led to object-specific manipulation that depended on the size and shape of the object. Objects examined included a ping-pong ball, cotton


bud, wooden block and rubber cap. Video shows behavior during the light-ON state. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 7: Photostimulation of the CaMKIIα+ MPA–vPAG circuit triggers object-craving behaviors.


Photostimulation of the MPA–vPAG circuit induces object-craving behaviors under various conditions. First, a CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mouse leaps down from a precipice to grasp the object.


Second, a CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mouse jumps to grasp the object in the air, reaching out with its paws and mouth. Even when the object was presented above water, the mouse tried to catch it


by moving around the edge of the water. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 8: Object-chasing behavior of CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice toward a moving object. CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice exposed to an object


moving along the contours of the letters B and G (representing our Behavioral Genetics laboratory) followed the object during the light-ON state. When the light was turned off right before


the mouse reached the letter G, the mouse stopped following the object and moved away from the G track. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 9: Photostimulation of the CaMKIIα+ MPA–vPAG circuit induces


hunting-like actions to prey. CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG mice exposed to a prey (cricket) under photostimulation. They showed series of hunting-like behaviors, such as chasing, biting and


carrying. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 10: Steering of mouse navigation in a complex maze using the MIDAS system. The video shows a schematic overview of the complex maze and a CaMKIIα::ChR2MPA-vPAG


mouse running the maze. _Left_, Top view of the maze (yellow circle, mouse; pink circle, object; black circle, waypoints; blue circle, current waypoint; red line, programmed pathway to the


goal; blue line, current guiding direction; black line, actual track of the mouse). _Top right_, Close-up video of the maze. The names of the hurdles are shown. _Bottom right_, Actual mouse


tracks and object positions, updated in real time (red circle, current object position). Note that the LED is turned on only when the object is positioned in the center of the five circles.


RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Park, SG., Jeong, YC., Kim, DG. _et al._ Medial preoptic circuit induces hunting-like actions to target


objects and prey. _Nat Neurosci_ 21, 364–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0072-x Download citation * Received: 18 April 2017 * Accepted: 09 December 2017 * Published: 29


January 2018 * Issue Date: March 2018 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0072-x SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get


shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative